The List of Suspicious Things

Jennie Godfrey

63 pages 2-hour read

Jennie Godfrey

The List of Suspicious Things

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of sexual violence, rape, graphic violence, racism, suicidal ideation, anti-immigrant bias, and sexism.

The Yorkshire Ripper

Beyond his role as a real-life serial killer, the Yorkshire Ripper symbolizes the multiple threats that destabilize the life of Miv and her community. His shadow permeates the town’s atmosphere, shaping the characters’ emotional and moral worlds and influencing their behavior.


First and foremost, the Ripper symbolizes the predatory nature of gendered violence. His crimes are explicitly directed at women, and the public discourse surrounding them reinforces entrenched misogyny. The distinction drawn in newspapers between “respectable” women and sex workers exposes a hierarchy of victimhood, suggesting that some women are more worthy of sympathy than others. This framing communicates to girls like Miv that women’s safety is conditional and subject to moral policing. The Ripper thus embodies not only individual brutality but a broader cultural system that blames women for their vulnerability. Miv’s growing awareness of this reality underscores The Impact of Violence on Innocence and Coming of Age. The Ripper becomes a symbol of the unseen, omnipresent threat attached to womanhood itself.


The Ripper also represents the forces threatening Yorkshire during a period of economic and social decline. The serial killer’s association with the region becomes another factor that tarnishes its reputation, in addition to mill closures and rising unemployment. In a town already characterized by insecurity, fear intensifies suspicion and fractures communal trust. Outsiders are scapegoated, racism gains traction, and difference becomes synonymous with danger.


On a personal level, the Ripper threatens the tenuous security of Miv’s life when the murders prompt Austin to consider relocating his family. Miv’s horror at the prospect reflects the limited sources of stability in her life. Lacking comfort or predictability at home, she finds constancy only in the familiarity of her hometown and her friendship with Sharon. Furthermore, Miv’s realization that life can change overnight, formed when her mother overdosed and fell silent, is reinforced by the killer’s randomness. The fact that he appears ordinary and evades capture for years intensifies Miv’s hypervigilance.

The List

The list is the novel’s central motif, encapsulating Godfrey’s exploration of fear, otherness, control, and moral growth. At its inception, it represents Miv’s desire to impose order on chaos. In a town overshadowed by the Yorkshire Ripper and in a home destabilized by her mother’s silence, Miv experiences the world as unpredictable and unsafe. Against this backdrop, the list converts the protagonist’s anxiety into manageable entries. As Miv later reflects, “Hunting a killer [is] simpler to deal with” (321) than confronting the confusing and painful changes within her own household. By identifying suspects, she convinces herself that the source of fear can be located and neutralized.


The criteria Miv uses to populate the list contribute to the novel’s critique of Otherness as a Container for Fear. Her focus on those who do not conform to social “norms” due to their race, behavior, or appearance mirrors the town’s broader impulse to project danger onto visible difference. However, as Miv spends time with these individuals, their humanity complicates her assumptions. Omar’s kindness, Helen’s vulnerability, and Jim’s good humor in the face of persecution destabilize the logic of her suspicions. The more she knows them, the harder it becomes to reduce them to categories. The list’s failure to identify the Ripper exposes its own inadequacy. At the same time, it inadvertently teaches Miv the value of community.


The motif also reflects the shifting dynamics of Miv’s friendship with Sharon. Initially, the list is a shared project, binding them together in purpose and secrecy. As Miv anxiously senses Sharon’s growing independence, her rhetorical question, “Who would we be together if we didn’t have the list” (259), highlights her perception of the investigation as a way of preserving their intimacy. However, their differing perspectives on the nature and purpose of the list reveal divergent developmental paths. For Sharon, identifying suspects is an act of fighting back against injustice and protecting the vulnerable. While the list becomes Miv’s obsession, Sharon increasingly questions the ethics of their surveillance. By the final chapters of Part Two, Miv is pursuing the list alone, signaling an emotional distance between the friends.

Healy Mill

The symbol of Healy Mill links Yorkshire’s industrial past to its troubled present, embodying economic decline, buried violence, and the consequences of neglect. Historically, the mill represents Yorkshire’s lost industrial identity. The town is described as “littered with abandoned mill buildings—a relic of a once thriving industry” (91), and these structures stand as monuments to the region’s economic collapse following deindustrialization. Their presence signals unemployment, hardship, and a broader erosion of communal pride and stability. For older generations like Aunty Jean’s, the mills once structured daily life and collective purpose. The mill’s decay mirrors the wider sense that something foundational has been lost in the region.


Healy Mill also carries ominous cultural associations. Recalling Aunty Jean’s saying when trouble looms, “There’ll be trouble at t’mill” (118), Miv reflects, “Maybe that was why the mills were associated with bad things in my mind?” (118). The phrase equates the mill with impending crisis and danger long before the novel’s climax. This association is reinforced by Healy Mill’s violent history. The story of John Harris, a child laborer accidentally strangled by machinery during a game, links the mill with a legacy of exploitation. John’s death is a reminder of the human cost of Yorkshire’s former economic prosperity, suggesting that violence is embedded in the building’s foundations.


As the narrative progresses, Healy Mill becomes the locus for contemporary conflict. The National Front leaflets Miv discovers there connects the abandoned building to political extremism and racial hatred. This shift from industry to harmful ideologies underscores Otherness as a Container for Collective Fear. The novel suggests that economic decline has enabled destructive forces to take root. Sharon’s death within this space illustrates the harm caused by the combined forces of economic resentment, racism, misogyny, and unchecked violence.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock the meaning behind every key symbol & motif

See how recurring imagery, objects, and ideas shape the narrative.

  • Explore how the author builds meaning through symbolism
  • Understand what symbols & motifs represent in the text
  • Connect recurring ideas to themes, characters, and events