57 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of ableism, illness and death, child death, and graphic violence.
The teens tells Gamache and Jean-Guy that they have found a body in the woods. Gamache rushes to the scene, where the body of Debbie Schneider is lying in the snow, not far from the party. She has been struck violently in the head and was killed just before midnight. The coroner later confirms that the murder weapon was likely a log. This likely means that the log was subsequently burned in the bonfire. Gamache goes inside and explains that everyone at the party will need to be questioned: He believes one of them must have killed Debbie while attempting to kill Abigail. Because of Abigail’s controversial beliefs, there are many people with a motive to kill her.
Accompanied by Colette, Jean-Guy and Gamache tell Abigail that Debbie is dead. Abigail and Colette retrace the events of the night: Before midnight, after the confrontation with Vincent Gilbert, Colette and Debbie wanted to leave and got their coats, but Abigail lingered to speak with Annie and Jean-Guy. Colette and Debbie went outside to wait. Eventually, Colette decided to go back inside and left Debbie waiting outside alone just before midnight.
At midnight, Abigail looked for Debbie but couldn’t find her anywhere. Both Abigail and Colette describe looking for Debbie, but neither confirms having seen the other in the places they claimed to be. Abigail also notes that she didn’t see Vincent Gilbert during the countdown—the window of time in which Debbie was killed.
Colette and Abigail are sent back to Colette’s home with a police escort; Gamache interviews most of the other partygoers and sends them home when they confirm that they saw nothing suspicious. They interview the teenagers, who explain that they hid alcohol in the woods and were drinking throughout the evening. One boy explains that he went to a spot near where the body was found to urinate twice: once about 10 minutes before midnight, and then again at about quarter past midnight. Since he found the body the second time, there is a narrow window of time in which Debbie was killed.
When they interview Haniya, she denies any involvement in the murder, explaining that “I would have little trouble killing Professor Robinson, but I wouldn’t make such a shit show of it” (349). She also points out that another perceived attempted attack on Abigail (assuming everyone believes that Debbie was killed by mistake) might make Abigail more sympathetic and powerful.
Gamache and Jean-Guy question Vincent Gilbert, who is vague about his whereabouts throughout the evening. After questioning Gilbert about how he first became familiar with Abigail’s research, Vincent admits that Colette sent it to him months earlier. Vincent also admits that he and Colette know each other because they both serve on the board of La Porte, an organization that supports individuals living with Down syndrome. Vincent is committed to advocating for individuals with disabilities but denies having anything to do with Debbie’s death. Gamache is left uncertain as to whether Vincent, Colette, or both are involved in the murder. Gamache also considers whether Abigail might have murdered her beloved friend: The use of a nearby log as a murder weapon implies that the attack was spontaneous and not premeditated.
Agent Lacoste arrives in Three Pines the following day to assist with the murder investigation. She and Jean-Guy are confident that Debbie’s murder is unrelated to the attack during the lecture, especially since Tardif’s brother (suspected as the most likely accomplice) was arrested prior to the party. Meanwhile, Gamache questions his godfather, Stephen Horowitz, who has been staying with the Gamache family and attended the party. Stephen is a wealthy, elderly man who deeply loves Gamache’s granddaughter and has deep respect for the sanctity of human life because of his experiences as a Holocaust survivor. Stephen admits that he would have been happy to see Abigail dead but denies having any involvement.
Agent Lacoste questions Alphonse Tardif (the brother of Edouard), who readily admits that he hid the gun and firecrackers in the auditorium prior to Abigail’s lecture; Alphonse insists that he and his brother only wanted to scare her, and Edouard purposefully missed when he fired the shots. It is later revealed that their elderly mother has a severe disability; according to Abigail’s proposal, their mother would likely be killed. This explains their motive for the attack.
Lacoste later relays her surprise to Gamache that Alphonse was so quick to confess. Then, Lacoste, Gamache, and Jean-Guy discuss various theories: The killer could have intentionally targeted Debbie or could have been trying to kill Colette. Meanwhile, Reine-Marie, a retired archivist, has been hired by a local woman named Susan Horton to go through boxes of papers and documents left behind by her late mother, Enid. Reine-Marie notes that monkeys have been doodled over all the documents; when she questions Susan, Susan has no knowledge of why her mother was obsessed with drawing monkeys. Before Reine-Marie leaves the house where Enid lived and died, she notices a small scratch on the wall in Enid’s bedroom.
Gamache continues to question Colette and Abigail; Abigail claims she planned the trip and attended the party to thank Ruth Zardo, a local poet whose poetry she utilized in her merchandise. However, Gamache has confirmed with Ruth that she refused the request to allow her poetry to be used. He points out that Debbie may have lied to Abigail about this and other aspects of her business. He also questions Abigail about the nickname that Debbie used for her: Abby Maria. Abigail admits that she had a younger sister, Maria, who had a severe disability and died as a child. The nickname comes from her mother’s habit of referring to the two girls collectively. Gamache asks why both Colette and Abigail concealed the existence of this sister, but they claim it’s simply a painful memory they have put behind them.
At the Horton house, James Horton (Enid’s son) is startled by Reine-Marie inspecting Enid’s bedroom and tells her to leave. Reine-Marie, however, has noticed that Enid scratched a monkey into the wall near her bed as she was dying and wonders why this was so important to her. She has one more box of Enid’s documents at her home. Meanwhile, Jean-Guy watches a new video from the lecture: He realizes that Vincent Gilbert was in attendance.
Lacoste rushes to confront Tardif, asking if Vincent Gilbert was his accomplice. Tardif claims he has never seen Gilbert before. Having received this update from Jean-Guy, Gamache asks Abigail about her confrontation with Gilbert at the party and whether she was already aware of his presence at the lecture. He notices that Colette seems very startled by this information. Colette later admits that she and Gilbert know each other through their work with the organization La Porte, which supports individuals with cognitive disabilities.
Jean-Guy, Gamache, and Lacoste discuss whether Vincent Gilbert could have been working alongside Tardif. Jean-Guy also updates the team that Debbie’s father (who lives in British Columbia) was devastated to learn about his daughter’s death. Gamache asks Jean-Guy to ask Debbie’s father about Maria (Abigail’s deceased sister). Jean-Guy, accompanied by Reine-Marie and Myrna (a resident of the village) decide to go to Montreal to research Vincent Gilbert’s career.
Gamache meets with Vincent Gilbert and asks why Gilbert concealed the fact that he was present at the lecture. Gilbert admits that he knew it would appear suspicious that he was at the scenes of the attack and the murder. He claims he wanted to experience the impact of Abigail Robinson’s argument in person. Gamache shows Gilbert a video recording that reveals that Gilbert was standing extremely close to Tardif when Tardif shot at Abigail: Gilbert saw the gun and could have intervened but allowed Tardif to shoot at Abigail.
Gilbert tries to justify his decision to Gamache, but they are interrupted when Lacoste rushes over. Lacoste has realized Simon Tardif (the son of Edouard Tardif) is employed as a server at the inn where the New Year’s Eve party was held. This means Simon is a significant suspect in the murder. Gamache questions Simon, who admits that he was the one who hid the gun and firecrackers in the lecture hall. However, Simon insists that he never wanted Abigail to get hurt, and he didn’t know she was at the party. When they question Alphonse Tardif, he admits that he was not involved in the attack at the lecture and lied to protect his nephew. Meanwhile, Jean-Guy, Myrna, and Reine-Marie have uncovered evidence that when Vincent Gilbert was a medical student decades earlier, he had a part-time job working for a medical researcher named Ewen Cameron.
In this section, the plot subverts mystery genre expectations since the murder (the central conflict driving the plot) is delayed and then serves as a plot twist. Readers are led to believe that the corpse found in the woods belongs to Abigail: She has already experienced one attack, and there are many people with a motive to kill her. It is only when Gamache and Jean-Guy see the face of the body that they realize Debbie, not Abigail, has been killed. This confusion sets the stage for a central assumption that will add complexity and suspense to the unfolding of the mystery: The killer was targeting Abigail and only killed Debbie by accident. This assumption, while ultimately false, develops the theme of Bias and Emotion Impacting Decisions. Because Gamache and Jean-Guy detest Abigail and her theories, they can readily believe that she was the target of the murder.
This early misdirection also highlights how emotion can cloud investigative objectivity even in seasoned detectives. Penny plays with genre conventions here, allowing her characters to walk directly into the trap of confirmation bias. Gamache and Jean-Guy are so disturbed by Abigail’s ideology that their emotional repulsion leads them to see the facts in a way that aligns with their expectations. This deepens the thematic tension between personal conviction and procedural clarity.
The confusion between Abigail and Debbie as the intended murder victim also reflects the motif of doubling and overlapping identities. Abigail and Debbie have known each other since childhood: Their lives are deeply intertwined, and they seem to know each other’s deepest secrets and emotions. The intimacy between the two women is reflected in the seemingly playful nickname “Abby Maria,” but this section begins to develop a more sinister tone around this aspect of their shared history. The nickname references Abigail’s childhood, in which she was treated as an extension of her deceased sister, Maria. The introduction of these dark and sinister aspects of Abigail’s past heightens the theme of Bias and Emotion Impacting Decisions. Gamache immediately assumes that Abigail’s attitude toward the elderly, the chronically ill, and those who have disabilities has been shaped by her lived experience of having a sister with a disability, although she flatly denies this, claiming that “it’s statistics. Cold hard facts. It has nothing to do with Maria” (235). Abigail’s refusal to acknowledge any emotional component to her theories is paradoxically more damning than an admission of how her past has shaped her.
This moment functions as a key turning point in the narrative. Penny forces readers to consider whether Abigail’s claim to reason and objectivity is in fact a cover for suppressed guilt or buried trauma. The irony is rich: The more Abigail insists on her detachment, the more Gamache suspect that her theories are emotionally motivated. This paradox not only enriches her character but also reinforces how often destructive ideologies are rooted in personal pain.
In classic murder mystery fashion, Penny establishes a cast of suspects, leaving both Gamache and the reader in suspense as to the true identity of the killer. Because the murder took place at a party, there were many people present, and any of them could have taken advantage of the chaotic and festive atmosphere to slip away and kill Debbie. This context reflects the novel’s overall ambiguous positioning of crowds and gatherings: Whenever people come together in groups, there is the potential for joy and connection but also for danger. Gamache’s investigation is complex because multiple individuals have sufficient motive to want Abigail dead, and few hide this attitude. Haniya and Vincent Gilbert both openly admit to wishing Abigail dead, which strengthens the possibility that one of them could be the killer. Paradoxically, the more an individual is committed to humanitarian aims and personal integrity, the more probable it is that they might have committed the crime. The nature of Abigail endorsing widespread euthanasia and a potential large-scale loss of life establishes the theme of Individual Rights in Conflict with the Collective Good, and even Gamache is forced to question whether an attack on her life could be considered morally justifiable.
This moral ambiguity is the emotional undercurrent of the novel. By placing Gamache in a position where his professional duty—to protect life—clashes with his personal horror at the ideology he’s defending, Penny asks whether upholding values like free speech and bodily autonomy still matters when those values are used to rationalize harm. The complexity of the plot mirrors the ethical complexity of the fact that someone killing Abigail to save lives would be a murderer to some and a hero to others.
Penny is known for her use of complex, multi-plot storylines, and the subplot of Reine-Marie’s investigation into Enid Horton provides an example of this technique. At first, Reine-Marie’s curiosity about the strange drawings of the monkeys seems to have nothing to do with Abigail Robinson, but it eventually leads her to crucial information about Vincent Gilbert’s questionable past and an increased probability that Gilbert could be the killer. The Enid Horton subplot also illustrates how seemingly tangential threads—like the monkey drawings—can reveal larger truths about power, trauma, and resistance. Reine-Marie’s attention to overlooked details mirrors the novel’s deeper ethic: that history’s darkest moments are often hidden in plain sight. Penny quietly suggests that moral rot doesn’t begin in violent acts but in the slow erosion of empathy, buried in records, institutions, and silences. The storyline about Ewen Cameron and his terrible experiments also connect thematically: Like Abigail, Cameron was a celebrated researcher who seemed to devote his life to logic and science but actually endorsed morally heinous practices. This information develops the theme of Bias and Emotion Impacting Decisions because Gilbert may have made a decision to stop Abigail from guilt-ridden motivations.
Together, these chapters deepen the narrative’s emotional and moral tension by asking not just who committed the murder, but why so many people feel that the world might be better off without Abigail Robinson in it. As Gamache tries to remain grounded in his principles, he confronts the uncomfortable truth that his own biases shape how he sees the facts. The themes of Bias and Emotion Impacting Decisions and Individual Rights in Conflict with the Collective Good collide in these chapters, forcing every character to reflect on what justice really means when ideology, trauma, and love are all in play.



Unlock all 57 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.