74 pages 2-hour read

The Magus

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1965

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section includes discussion of physical abuse and sexual content.

The Quest for an Authentic Self Amid Illusions

While the novel invites multiple interpretations, one of its central readings is that of an allegory for the search of the true self. Using the trope of the hero’s quest, the narrative shows how Nick battles socially imposed and ego-driven notions about his identity to arrive at a place of emotional honesty. Through Nick’s experiences, the novel examines the quest for an authentic self amid illusions.


Many of Nick’s original notions are presented as illusions, whether in the form of misguided ideas, actual smoke-and-mirrors theatrics, or personas. One such persona is Nick’s portrayal of himself as a sophisticated, distinguished man. When he and Alison meet one of his former college mates, Nick feels this persona is diminished by Alison’s open, Australian manner. Consequently, he makes fun of Alison to the friend, underplaying the seriousness of his feelings for her. Nick’s behavior in this sequence shows his self is still being formed in response to artificial constructs like appearance and status.


Another important aspect of Nick’s false self is his illusion that a true male makes new sexual conquests, which drives him to pursue Julie at the expense of Alison. Nick also harbors the notion that his “real” hypermasculine self is being thwarted by the androgynous values of contemporary society. Thus, he looks for a situation “where a woman was a woman and [he] was obliged to be fully a man” (244). In this context, Julie’s seeming submissiveness has for Nick “all the fascination of an old house after a cramped, anonymous modern flat” (244).


As the preceding quote indicates, Nick is uncomfortable with the ordinariness of modern life, and suffers from the illusion that to be happy he must transport himself into a mythic or literary reality. This is why he frequently thinks of himself as a “Robinson Crusoe” (62) or a “Ulysses” (153) in euphoric moments. The lesson Nick must learn here is that his authentic self lies in his own reality, rather than that of others. To this extent, Conchis’s plays can be seen as a temptation for Nick to lose himself in someone else’s story. Similarly, alter egos like De Deukans and Henrik offer personas that Nick can adopt to navigate existence, while belief systems like Christian devotion or existentialism present scripts that Nick can enact in his own life. Since each of these “masks” ultimately proves dissatisfying or dangerous, the lesson for Nick is that he must create his own myth, his own belief system, his own magical land.


For Nick, that magical land is the ordinary world inhabited by his unmasked self. Nick’s offer of love to Alison in the final chapter reflects his new-found clear-eyed appraisal of himself. Not only does he tell her that he does not have much to offer her, but he is also open about the fact that “If Lily walked down that path behind us and beckoned to me … I don’t know […] she isn’t one girl, but a type of encounter” (678). By referring to Lily as “a type of encounter,” Nick admits to Alison that he may not be able to offer Alison sexual fidelity. It is Alison’s choice now to accept or reject Nick with all his flaws. As Nick’s offer shows, the narrative does not indicate that the true self is necessarily “moral” or perfect; rather, it is self-aware and honest.

Narrative Instability as Metaphor for Reality

In The Magus, John Fowles disrupts the understanding of the narrative’s “truth” or meaning to reflect the arbitrary and inscrutable nature of reality. Nick’s pursuit of the meaning behind Conchis’s godgame is analogous for human beings trying to make sense of a bizarre world, thereby presenting narrative instability as metaphor for reality.


Just like humans invent various belief systems to locate a meaning in existence, Nick spends hours and days thinking about Conchis’s motives. As the lies and twists pile up, it is difficult to determine if Julie is really Julie Holmes, if Conchis’s real name is even Maurice Conchis, or if the people playing psychologists in the trial scene are actual medical professionals. It is also impossible to tell if figures like Henrik Nygaard and De Deukans actually existed. Nick’s meeting with Lily de Seitas late in the novel shows the continuing pattern of narrative instability: Lily lies about Conchis being her music teacher “Mr. Rat” (610), giving rise to a whole new narrative.


The big joke of the novel is that as destabilizing as these narrative disruptions may be, they are nothing compared to the shocks offered by real life. To emphasize the arbitrariness of life, the text refers to both individual and larger traumas, whether it be the death of Nick’s parents, or the swiftness with which war kills Conchis’s young fellow-soldiers. The scene in which the men in all black—a clear allusion to the uniforms of the Italian fascist Blackshirts and Nazi German SS—grab Nick violently is reminiscent of the sudden house raids in Europe in the years leading to World War II. Further, even the seemingly unbelievable excesses of eccentric millionaires in the novel, such as De Deukans’s grotesque sex doll, are more credible than the extremes to which people go in real life.


Another purpose narrative instability serves is to encourage an ongoing conversation between reader and text, and by extension human beings and reality. Since the text and reality are always shifting in meaning, readers must approach them again and again, open to new modes of enquiry. For instance, the ending of The Magus is left deliberately open, inviting the reader to ask if Nick has really changed. One reading may suggest Nick is frozen in time and his nature, another may suggest there is hope ahead for Nick, while yet another may suggest the novel parodies the very concept of love and hope. All these interpretations are valid, much like the interpretations of the world offered by literature, art, mythology, and religion.

The True Meaning and Price of Freedom

Nick escapes to Phraxos in search of freedom and adventure, hoping that he can find the satisfaction and excitement that he seeks there. As he becomes more and more engrossed in Cochis’s “play,” however, Nick must confront the true meaning and price of freedom.


Conchis begins his life story to Nick with an early and seemingly odd example of the freedom to choose: the freedom to desert the battlefield. In a traditional narrative, Conchis’s choice to abandon war would be regarded as cowardice, a failure of nerve, or the abdication of duty. However, Conchis is convinced that his choice is pure because it is rooted in “an intense new conviction” (119) of the futility of war. He goes so far as to say that it would be better for England to become a Prussian colony than lose more young people to war. Later in the novel, Conchis will say something even more controversial about the nature of freedom. Freedom or free will is worth having even in its worst manifestations, even when it means the free will of the Germans to kill or torture. While Conchis’s views are not gospel truth—nothing in the text is—they do illustrate the novel’s message about the importance of choice and free will.


An important aspect of freedom is that it encompasses the freedom to refuse, to say no, much as Conchis denied the dominant narrative that war was a glorious enterprise. Even when Nick is manipulated into the godgame, he always retains the choice to decline Conchis’s invitation. The invitation motif is significant, as it shows that time and again, Nick could have opted not to return to Bourani. Similarly, Nick could have opted not to go to Phraxos and remain in London with Alison. As these examples show, the freedom to refuse gives human beings a modicum of control in an arbitrary and often cruel existence. The freedom of choice is also positioned as a quality which is at once priceless and costly: In Conchis’s case, the freedom to desert the army cost him Lily’s love; in Henrik’s case, the freedom to love God cost him a “normal” life; while for the Greek kapetan, the freedom for his cause cost him his vey life.


The Greek kapetan is the symbol of the meaning and cost of freedom in the novel, the living eleutheria, or liberty itself. So central is the story of the kapetan to the message of the godgame that Conchis emphasizes to Nick “for once it is a true story” (424). The kapetan’s exercise of eleutheria shows Conchis that while there is no God, this is so because “there is a God that we can never know” (446). The complex statement implies that while human notions of God are incomplete, human freedom is proof of an unknowable divine spirit.


Nick’s moment for exercising eleutheria—a freedom of choice driven by one’s true nature and beliefs—arrives in the form of the whip he can use on Julie/Lily. At first, Nick thinks that he has the freedom of choice to whip the woman who emotionally tormented him, before realizing that the greater freedom is the freedom to refuse. Nick lowers the whip, choosing the liberty that comes from forgiveness.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence