The Meaning of Marriage: Facing the Complexities of Commitment with the Wisdom of God

Why do the Kellers critique the ideal of self-fulfillment in romantic relationships? Why do they propose a counter-vision rooted in service and self-emptying love?

Analyze how the Kellers use contrast as a structuring device to unpack differing views of gender roles, intimacy, and fulfillment in marriage.

Discuss the significance of the “pseudo-spouse” phenomenon. What are the benefits of the Kellers’ prescriptive prioritization model of marriage? What are its limitations?

Examine the book’s treatment of singleness. Is the Kellers’ theological reasoning affirming singleness as a valid and meaningful Christian calling persuasive? Why or why not?

How does The Meaning of Marriage address gender stereotypes and complementarian roles within marriage? How do the authors’ interpretations align or conflict with contemporary feminist critiques?

Analyze how the concept of “comprehensive attraction” redefines romantic compatibility. What does this term reveal about the Kellers’ view on emotional, spiritual, and intellectual intimacy?

How do the Kellers reframe sex as a covenant-renewing act rather than a purely physical experience? Consider the personal anecdotes, metaphors, and biblical references used to make this case.

How does the authors’ concept of “emotional wealth” contrast with cultural notions of self-sufficiency and emotional independence? What are the benefits and downsides of this concept?