46 pages 1-hour read

The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1824

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Predestination

The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner satirizes an element of Scottish Calvinist belief that was prevalent in the 17th century. According to this much-debated doctrine, certain members of the designated church were predestined to enter heaven. Since they were members of the chosen church, they would be chosen by God for salvation. Since they were chosen by God, their actions were inherently moral, as they were pre-approved by an almighty divine being. The preacher Robert Wringhim is an advocate for this belief. Rabina and her son Robert are members of his congregation, believing that this makes them “justified” people. Robert is raised in this environment, though he struggles with the logical parameters of the doctrine. Robert knows that he has sinful thoughts, yet he has been raised to believe that he is inherently blessed by God. His sins are not like the sins of others, distinguishing him from those outside Wringhim’s church and lending him an arrogance and a sense of entitlement that is resented by many other people in the society. Outside of political and spiritual differences, men like Laird Colwan dislike Wringhim and his concept of predestination on a personal level.


Robert considers himself a justified person. When he meets Gil-Martin, he is exposed to the absurdities and the logical consequences of such a belief. Gil-Martin is well-versed in theology, which impresses Robert. Gil-Martin naturally reminds him of his adoptive father, to the point where Robert finds Gil-Martin’s theologizing to be comforting at a time when he is experiencing doubts about his religion. Gil-Martin does more than just comfort Robert. He massages Robert’s sense of self-importance, probing him with suggestions and reassurances. Gil-Martin agrees with Wringhim, or he claims to do so. He tells Robert that predestination is not only real, but that it puts Robert in an extremely fortunate position. Robert should become God’s agent on Earth, Gil-Martin suggests, killing sinners to expediate their journey to either heaven or hell. Since Robert is a justified man, predestined for heaven, any such murders are inherently endorsed by God. Robert has been raised in the church of Robert Wringhim and, as a consequence, he cannot see any issue with his line of reasoning. Rather than exposing him to the absurdity of his beliefs, Gil-Martin metastasizes a corrosive and destructive theology that ends with Robert’s complete corruption. Robert kills his brother and commits many sins, becoming utterly intoxicated on his own misguided interpretation of his predestined status.


Robert’s fate introduces an alternative, non-Calvinist form of predestination to the novel. While satirizing Robert’s belief that he is naturally destined for heaven, the novel suggests that he is destined, instead, for hell. Robert is such an easy target for Gil-Martin because he is already obsessed with resentment. Predestination and theology, in this sense, provide a convenient excuse for something Robert has long desired to do. The intensity of Robert’s hate for his father and brother, combined with the circumstances of his birth, mean that he is almost predestined to be corrupted. His mind is plagued by petty grievances, to the extent that religion could barely contain his desire for revenge. Furthermore, predestination as a theme extends as a warning against bestowing blind faith in anything, whether a religion or a dangerous person like Gil-Martin.

Doubles and Doppelgängers

The novel is built on a foundation of doubles and doppelgängers. The two narrators—the editor and Robert Wringhim—provide competing and contrasting versions of events. Between these two versions, a sense of unreliability and uncanniness emerges. Nothing is fixed or reliable, to the extent that every version of something has a mirror or an alternative. The audience is left to piece together their own reality from any truth that emerges between the two versions of the same story. Likewise, Robert’s life becomes an exercise in unreliable duality. After his introduction to Gil-Martin, he begins to black out. He experiences extended periods of unconsciousness in which (he believes) he could not possibly have done anything. At the same time, people assure him that he has been very active and committed many immoral acts. Robert feels himself doubled, with his other self committing crimes and carrying out acts that Robert believes he would never commit. Robert’s narrative casts these incidents aside; he does not entertain the possibility that he committed such acts, yet everyone else is convinced he has done so. Reality is pieced together from the space between the two competing Roberts. Truth and reality emerge from the tension between doubles, both in narrative and character terms. The audience is given the option of believing the editor or Robert, while the people in the story are given the choice of believing whichever of Robert’s self happens to be active at any given moment.


Gil-Martin has the ability to adopt the appearance of anyone else. By changing his appearance, he is able to understand the thoughts and emotions of another person. He changes into George, for example, and is able to tell Robert where George is going. When he changes into Robert, he is able to understand Robert’s feelings. Gil-Martin uses his talents as a doppelgänger to wreak havoc. By turning into George, he orchestrates Robert’s attacks. By turning into Robert, he learns how to manipulate Robert. Gil-Martin evidently uses his powers for evil purposes, but his capacity to understand the thoughts and feelings of other people makes him one of the few characters in the novel who is capable of empathy. Colwan, George, Rabina, Robert, and Wringhim are all too swept up in their beliefs to risk empathizing with anyone. Gil-Martin is only character who shows a genuine desire to understand those around him. Empathy is weaponized through the process of doubling, in which a seemingly benevolent act is turned malicious.


In the city of Edinburgh, the competing factions create violent dichotomies. Jacobite faces off against Episcopalian, leading to fighting in the streets. Each person in the city takes a side, squaring off against their neighbors and peers based on minor differences in political opinion or religious belief. The duality of society is taken to an extreme, with the creation of a fundamentalist binary that cannot be tolerated by anyone involved. As Robert almost loses his mind amid accusations that his other self is out committing terrible sins, Scottish society is driven to the brink of insanity by the prospect of the emerging duality. The binary beliefs of Scottish society cause violence and chaos. Courts of law are undermined while every man sins against his neighbor, all the while assuring himself that he is good and just. Each side thinks themselves the hero, as Robert does, while fighting against people who are—for the most part—as similar as Robert and George. The society collapses into an obsession of doubled ideology, near-mirror images that create chaos through their minor differences. These tiny differences create a sense of uncanniness, a maddening obsession that suggests that the society, like Robert, is heading for a tragic end.

Uncertain Reality

The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner is structured in such a way that there are two narrators. The editor is the narrator of the opening and closing sections of the novel. These sections take the form of a historical investigation, in which the editor treats the story of Robert Wringhim Colwan as somewhere between folklore, history, and legend. Since the editor is investigating the story almost a hundred years later, these sections of the novel are inherently cast in doubt. The story is not reliable and—as the narrator admits—the events of the story cannot possibly be true. Even a hundred years later, the cultural mood in Scotland is very different. The religious fanaticism and conflict that defined the 17th century have dissipated in the time that has passed since the editor began the investigation. The editor presents the opening and closing of the novel as a detached, objective, skeptical analysis of a local legend. The role of the narrator, according to the editor, is to present the audience with all the available information and then allow the audience to come to their own conclusion. As evidenced by the final lines of the novel, the editor remains unsure of what actually happened in the past but feels obliged to provide all the possible information to the audience. According to the editor, the role of the narrator is to facilitate the audience’s own judgment.


The middle sections of the novel are narrated by Robert himself. His audience is not necessarily the readers of his religious pamphlet. His audience is God, which is why he chooses a title that reflects this. These are the private (not intended for wider consumption) memoirs and confessions of a justified sinner. Therefore, it can be understood that Robert’s account is as factual as possible; he is not attempting to manipulate readers to convince them of his innocence. Robert is confessing the sins that were implanted in him by his belief that he was a justified person. Robert does not want the audience to reach their own conclusions; he wants the audience to absolve (or, at the very least, understand) his mistakes. For Robert, the role of the narrator is inextricably linked to the nature of the text. However, this subjective version of events, which should be edifying, is still full of holes and uncertainties because so much of the story is driven by Gil-Martin, whose motives and actions can only be guessed at.


Furthermore, Robert’s narration is such that he maintains his own delusions. In spite of the evidence presented by the editor, Robert clings to certain beliefs. In the case of George’s murder, for example, he allows himself to believe Gil-Martin’s version of events, in which he defeated his brother in an honorable duel. The editor contradicts this, presenting an eyewitness testimony that suggests that Robert stabbed his brother in the back. The contradictions between Robert’s personal search for absolution and the editor’s skeptical investigation of historical events is suggestive of the novel’s use of an unreliable narrator. Robert cannot be trusted, in life or in death, as he was never able to truly abandon his beliefs. The validity of the whole novel is at last called in question by author James Hogg casting himself as an unwilling and unreliable character in the final part of the book.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence