The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui

Bertolt Brecht

49 pages 1-hour read

Bertolt Brecht

The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1941

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Scenes 4-7Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Scene 4 Summary

Content Warning: This section contains a reference to death by suicide.


Dogsborough explains to his son why he regrets buying their large house in the country. He assures himself that neither accepting the dockyard shares nor helping to secure the loan for the Trust were crimes, but buying the house first was “an error […] or could be perceived that way” (22). He fears that they have been caught in a trap by the Trust; a public inquiry is being held into the dockland deal and the money is already gone without any of the construction work having begun. Dogsborough, just like the other members of the Trust, spent the loan money on other things. Dogsborough hopes that no one knows that he was involved in the dockyard deal.


A servant announces that Butcher is calling on the telephone. Dogsborough sends his son to deal with the call, wondering what Butcher could want. When his son returns with news that city hall has voted to investigate the dockyard scheme, Dogsborough feels faint. Butcher wants to come over, Young Dogsborough says. 


Dogsborough does not want to see Butcher, but the servant interrupts to announce that Ui is here to see Dogsborough, supposedly sent by Clark. Dogsborough tells the servant to throw Ui out, but Ui and Roma march into the room. They refuse to listen to Dogsborough’s insistence that they leave. Roma jokes that they are not violent; they are just prepared to offer “a little friendly encouragement” (24).


Ui addresses Dogsborough. He insists that his reputation as a criminal is unfair. Envious people have smeared him, he claims, while he is actually a successful businessman who rose from poverty as a self-made man. All he wants is for Dogsborough to “put in a good word” (25) for Ui and counteract these malicious rumors as he prepares a deal to protect the vegetable trade from all threats, “with force if necessary” (25). There may not have been any threats, but he can envision the vandalism and destruction that may soon threaten humble businessowners. These business owners may be willing to pay a small sum as protection against such violence. The Cauliflower Trust needs Ui and his protection, and he offers his 30 loyal men as “muscle” (26) for the Trust. Ui urges Dogsborough to accept his help. 


When Dogsborough threatens to call the police, Ui becomes angry. He threatens to expose Dogsborough for his involvement in the waterfront scandal. Ui insists that he alone can save Dogsborough from recrimination. Ui breaks down in tears, begging Dogsborough to help him, otherwise he will “destroy” (27) Dogsborough. With Dogsborough continuing to refuse him, Ui departs with Roma.


Dogsborough assures himself that the investigation will not find him guilty. Goodwill and Gaffes, representatives of the City Council, enter. They want to talk about the “fishy” (28) loan. They are reluctant to accuse Dogsborough, a man with a long and storied reputation. However, O’Casey will lead an investigation that—they hope—could clear Dogsborough’s name. They encourage Dogsborough to send an impartial representative with a “spotless reputation” (29) to explain the situation to the City Council. Dogsborough agrees to send them someone.

Scene 5 Summary

The characters gather at City Hall. The members of the Trust assure themselves that Sheet will arrive soon and that Dogsborough will help to ensure that he is not convicted. They wait for the mysterious man who will supposedly clarify everything on Dogsborough’s behalf; he will arrive with Sheet. 


Gaffes brings news that Sheet has been found murdered in his hotel room. Clarke believes that the murder has “torpedoed this investigation” (31), yet O’Casey continues to ask questions. The members of the Trust warn O’Casey to stop his slanderous accusations, but they are interrupted by the arrival of Dogsborough’s mysterious defender: Arturo Ui, flanked by Roma and his bodyguards. His arrival shocks the councilors and the reporters.


O’Casey calls for order. Dogsborough remains silent, leading O’Casey to presume that Ui has his “full confidence” (32). Ui is angry and contentious. He insists that the money was indeed embezzled, but that Sheet was the guilty person, rather than Dogsborough or the Trust. Ui gives alibis for himself and Roma, then asserts that “Sheet’s suicide is but the inevitable result / of his monstrous crime” (34). O’Casey insists that Sheet was murdered and he still wants to know who really owns the dockyard. He accuses Dogsborough of working with the Trust. 


Amid the uproar, Ui demands silence. He defends Dogsborough against O’Casey’s accusations, so O’Casey summons his first witness: Bowl. The trial is interrupted by machine gun fire from outside. Bowl is shot dead outside the court. Amid the confusion, Ui approaches Dogsborough with a congratulatory handshake. He claims that he can always “clear up these situations” (36).

Scene 6 Summary

Bodyguards drag a down-at-heel actor into Ui’s suite at the Mammoth Hotel. Ui wants the actor to teach him better pronunciation and presentation, since he plans to “go into politics” (37). The drunk actor—named Mahoney—agrees to help Ui. First, Ui wants to walk with authority. Next Mahoney advises Ui how to stand. Ui wants to impress “the little guy” (38), puffing himself up just like Clarke does. He does not care whether professors or intellectuals feel that his demeanor is affected, so long as he convinces regular people. 


Dogsborough may appear worse for wear these days, Ui says, but he still has a use. Givola suggests that they replace Dogsborough with Giri in the future, but subtly mentions that Giri laughs at Ui behind his back. Ui insists that he is willing to “overlook the foibles of [his] employees” (40). Mahoney encourages Ui to recite a soliloquy from William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar.

Scene 7 Summary

In the Cauliflower Trust office, Ui gathers his lieutenants together in front of a group of small-vegetable dealers. On the platform beside him is Old Dogsborough, seemingly sick. Clark lurks in the background. 


Ui yells about murder, extortion, and gunfire in the streets in the wake of Bowl’s murder on the steps of City Hall. The City Council, Ui says, does nothing. They “would rather spend their time cooking up shady deals and slandering innocent people” (41) than take action. Ui announces that “chaos rules” (42) and claims that, in this violent world, no man would ever willingly lay down the weapon he uses to protect himself, his family, and his property. The current system is broken, and he must strike first lest his enemies strike. He preaches the need for unity, sacrifice, and protection, the latter of which is not free. He offers protection to the vegetable dealers, in exchange for a fee.


Clark is dragged forward to vouch for the propriety of Ui’s offer. Clark recognizes the way in which “certain outside elements” (43) have made the vegetable trade much more expensive and much less profitable. Ui and his men, Clark says, offer a solution. Clark sympathizes with the individual working man, but does not want the workers to band together to strike. A striking worker is a “subversive personage” (44) and must be dealt with accordingly.


Ui credits the presence of Dogsborough to show that his entire operation is above board and respectable. Giri invites questions from the audience, but the people are too intimidated to say anything to him. When Givola asks whether the dealers would rather pay protection or suffer from “murder, tyranny, theft and extortion” (45), the dealers point out that they have not experienced much trouble. 


Hastily, at Ui’s instruction, Givola drags in a heavily made-up Dockdaisy, who leads a little girl by the hand. Dockdaisy is introduced as Mrs. Bowl. Dockdaisy thanks Ui for all his help after her supposed husband’s death. Giri is wearing Bowl’s hat; he has a habit of wearing the hats of his victims in public. He walks through the crowd, leading a group of men who carry heavy gasoline cannisters out the door as Ui deplores the “shameless wave of crime” (46). 


As a bodyguard sings a schmaltzy song in memory of Bowl, fire engines rush in the street outside. On the waterfront, Mr. Hook’s vegetable store is on fire. Cans of gasoline were found nearby, indicating arson. Roma is incensed when someone accuses Ui’s men of setting the fire. The bodyguards intimidate the dealers into denying that they saw anything. Ui points to the fire as proof that he was right and that the dealers should support him.

Scenes 4-7 Analysis

The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui is a play about The Nature of Complicity and Resistance when people are faced with the rise of fascism. The rise of Arturo Ui, as the title of the play makes clear, is eminently resistible. The tragedy of the play is that so few people actually attempt to resist, as they all believe that they—unlike everyone else—is intelligent or cunning enough to control Ui. While characters such as those in the Trust or Dogsborough show the tragic underestimation that allows Ui to take power, O’Casey emerges as one of the few people brave enough to stand up to Ui. 


The first investigation is a farcical affair, in which Ui and his henchmen barely attempt to conceal their violence and intimidation. As the Trust side with Ui and the case is thrown out, O’Casey is humiliated and powerless. The spectacle of the trial has a function: It undermines the legitimacy of the state, deliberately revealing the powerlessness of its institutions. O’Casey is a victim of this powerlessness, but the play celebrates him for taking a stand: Of all the characters in the play, he alone acts in the public good rather than his own self-interest. The play suggests that O’Casey only fails because he stands alone—if others were to stand alongside O’Casey and persecute those who deliberately break the law, then figures like Ui may not be able to take power.


The scene in which Ui takes lessons from Mahoney the actor provides insight into the insecurity and performative nature of his character. From the first scenes of the play, Ui is a violent and determined individual. He is happy to use violence to take power, projecting himself as a strong authoritarian. However, he feels insecure enough that he needs to adapt his public persona to be more charismatic and appealing. That he should turn to an actor to accomplish this illustrates the ironic interplay between the character and the play itself. 


Like the play, the public persona of Ui is a work of fiction. He wears the persona of Ui like a mask and tweaks it with the actor’s help to make it more effective and appealing. There is a cynicism to his performance, as he does not care about the truth regarding himself or his society; all he cares about is taking power, so his public persona is a reflection of what he believes the public wants to see. 


The public persona of Arturo Ui is a reflection of his view of the public and his eagerness to manipulate them through The Dangers of Greed and Self-Interest. He believes that the public want a strongman to lead them through difficult times. Since he has such a low opinion of the public, a few lessons from a down-at-heel actor are enough to turn him into the exact persona that he believes will seduce them. He does not actually care for the public’s problems or well-being. Instead, he is patronizing and insulting to them. That his cynicism should be rewarded so rapidly is a damning indictment of the society itself.


As with the hastily crafted public persona of Ui himself, many of the other characters care little about truth and honesty. They only care about the appearance of truth and honesty. Throughout the play, many characters tell many lies and behave in a corrupt, underhanded manner. They deny involvement in violence, even though the audience has witnessed these acts of violence. When these lies go unpunished or unnoticed, the audience realizes that truth in this society does not matter. 


Instead, the public performance of honesty—often by the most dishonest characters in the play—is all that matters. Ui, Giri, Roma, and Givola all publicly speak about the need for truth and accountability. They present themselves as honest men while acting as criminals. The play suggests that the rise of men like Ui is made possible when people stop caring about the actual truth and only care about embracing whatever is convenient or what they want to hear.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 49 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs