49 pages • 1-hour read
Bertolt BrechtA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
If there is a common factor that brings together the characters in The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui, it is self-interest. Each character shows themselves to be, at heart, a cynic. There are few figures who are not greedy, self-interested, or cynical, a situation that Ui seizes upon to take power. Since he is the most cynical and self-interested of all, he is best- equipped to take advantage of the shared failings of society. The play thus examines the dangers of greed and self-interest, exposing how such moral failings can enable the rise of fascism.
The setting of 1930s Chicago mirrors the economic strife of Germany in the 1920s. Like Germany, Chicago is suffering from an economic downturn. The sudden need for money has a caustic effect on the morality of the characters, making them more likely to act in a purely self-interested manner. The men of the Cauliflower Trust, for example, are not willing to endure lost profits. Rather than invest in the city and its infrastructure, they plot to take a bank loan (secured in the name of renovating the docks) and use it to make up for their diminished earnings. Their disregard for the public good shows how these men are motivated by greed rather than selflessness. Self-interest paves the way for Ui’s rise to prominence.
The corrupt loan becomes a point of contention in the city. Since the Trust embroiled a respectable figure like Old Dogsborough in their scheme, they have threatened the legitimacy of all public institutions. This cynical attitude toward society is an opportunity for Ui to turn everyone against these same systems of governance. He frames supporting him as a matter of self-interest, as his many lieutenants frequently ask the vegetable dealers who can be trusted to protect them and their businesses. Each vegetable dealer believes that they are acting in their self-interest by allying with a known criminal like Ui; since even the government is corrupt, they reason, there is no one left to trust and at least Ui seems more honest about his criminality. Greed and self-interest thus create a power vacuum in society for Ui to prey upon.
Ui, however, is a noted liar, as shown by his and his lieutenants’ conduct in court. So many people believe that they can manipulate or control Ui, a belief that is fueled by their mistaken confidence and their relentless greed. Dogsborough, the Trust, and even the vegetable dealers believe that they are different. Ui proves them wrong: In a self-interested, greedy world, he alone is able to weaponize this negative emotion to maximal effect.
Whereas most other characters believe that money is the ultimate goal, Ui drives toward power. As such, his greed manifests differently. This subtle nuance between a greed for money and a greed for power allows Ui to take advantage of the people who underestimate him. His rise is resistible, but not by greedy men.
The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui is a satirical allegory for the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany before World War II. The play reimagines Hitler’s rise in the context of Chicago in the 1930s, turning the violence of fascism into the violence of the mobsters and gangsters of the prohibition era. As the characters face Arturo Ui’s rise to power, they confront a dilemma: to resist or to comply. In examining how the characters either challenge or facilitate Ui’s rise, Brecht examines the nature of complicity and resistance.
The title of The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui makes clear Brecht’s intentions. Fascism can and should be resisted, so the title itself is a call to action for his audience. The play shows how people are given many opportunities to halt Ui’s rise to power or to show some form of resistance. Due to greed and self-interest, however, they often fail to do so. The Trust mistakenly believe that Ui can be controlled, so they collude with him instead of taking a stand against him and his violent mayhem. Dogsborough’s acceptance of Ui’s help undermines not only his own reputation, but also seriously damages the reputation of political institutions and the rule of law in general. The vegetable dealers, meanwhile, imagine that they are powerless to stop him, even though they outnumber him. As a result, all agree to help Ui, making his ascent to power not only possible, but far easier than it otherwise would have been.
Those who collude with Ui are implicitly condemned by the play, having failed to offer any meaningful form of resistance. At the same time, there are those who want to resist Ui but who are killed in the process. Ignatius, for example, is wary of what Ui represents. He understands that he can make money from Ui, but he believes that Ui will inevitably turn on him. Even after he makes a deal with Ui, he is proved right. He is murdered, and his distrust of Ui is vindicated. Similarly, people who might threaten Ui’s interests, such as Bowl, are also murdered. In depicting the violence of fascist leaders, Brecht acknowledges the dangers of resistance. Nevertheless, the play makes it clear that enabling violence ultimately means that the violence will simply escalate. Resistance may be dangerous, but it also the only hope of ending the violence for good.
Of all the characters, O’Casey emerges as one of the few people capable of offering any meaningful resistance to Ui. He survives the play, even if the institution which he represents does not. O’Casey may not be successful, but his portrayal in the play suggests that even this failure is a commendable effort, in contrast to the fatalism and pessimism of the other characters. O’Casey embodies Brecht’s suggestion—the suggestion that he imparts to the audience—that they should do something, anything, to prevent the rise of men like Arturo Ui. Failure can be tolerated, the play suggests, but fascism and passivity cannot.
The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui portrays fascism as inherently violent. The same tactics of brutal gang violence deployed by Ui and his men against the workers of Chicago and against anyone who resists them are directly parallel to the violent tactics used by Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party. However, the play also suggests that violence and criminality go hand-in-hand with betrayal, presenting duplicity and paranoia as the hallmarks of a fascist inner circle.
It is not by coincidence that Ui’s lieutenants are, to a man, deeply suspicious and quick to betray one another. They are not only actively engaging in a conspiracy together by blackmailing Dogsborough, but are also engaging in conspiracies against one another. At various points, Roma, Giri, and Givola all suggest to Ui that their fellow lieutenants cannot be trusted. They conspire against one another openly, bickering and arguing in such a way that they hurl unfounded accusations against one another in front of Ui as they vie for power. They operate in a zero-sum world: The logical consequence of their violence and fascism is that they will inevitably turn on one another.
As such, the play presents betrayal as endemic to fascism. This betrayal exists before the play begins: Ui fuels his rise by publicly playing up personal and political grievances to draw people to his side, telling them that they have been betrayed by politicians and institutions. Adolf Hitler did the same, popularizing the myth that the German army had been undermined by political elites and allies in World War I. The ideology itself is thus founded on grievance and a sense of betrayal, so it is inevitable that the characters should turn on each other since they are all prone to the same mode of thinking that drew them to fascism in the first place. They are simply redirecting their power and violence against internal rather than external targets.
Ui is not immune to this obsession with betrayal, showing himself to be as violent and as paranoid as everyone else. He even betrays his most loyal lieutenant in the erroneous belief that doing so will keep him safe. Of all the lieutenants, Roma would never move against Ui, yet Ui betrays him because he cannot envision a world in which someone is sincere in their loyalty. Since Ui has built his entire worldview on grievance and betrayal, he cannot help but turn against his most loyal soldiers.
The Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui presents fascism as a death drive. The ideology is corrosive, violent, and paranoid, condemning its adherents to inevitably turn on one another. However, this inevitability is separate from Brecht’s call to action. Fascism may be a death drive, he suggests, but this doomed ideology spreads violence and brutality in such a way that many others will be affected. As such, resistance even more essential, with Brecht urging the audience to intervene to prevent the rise of fascism before the inevitable betrayal leads to violence and death.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.