The Runaway Jury

John Grisham

70 pages 2-hour read

John Grisham

The Runaway Jury

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1996

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Nicholas Easter/Jeff Kerr

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of illness, death, addiction, substance use, and pregnancy termination.


Nicholas, or Jeff, is one of the main characters of The Runaway Jury. He is a 27-year-old man originally from Austin, Texas. He attended Rice University for his undergraduate degree before completing a year of law school at Kansas University, where he met Marlee/Claire Clement/Gabrielle Brant and fell in love. Disgusted by the largess of corporate law, Nicholas dropped out and began following Marlee around the country, pursuing various tobacco litigation trials. Since the novel is more plot driven than character driven, Nicholas’s character development is limited. Instead, the focus of his character arc is the discovery of who he is and what he plans to do with the influence he cultivates over his fellow jurors. Nicholas first appears in the narrative through the surveillance of the jury consulting firm that Fitch hires. The consultants photograph Nicholas at his job at Computer Hut, and when they review the photos, they note, 


The face in the photo was lean and tanned and smiling slightly with lips closed. […] He appeared neat, in shape, and the man who took the photo actually spoke with Nicholas as he pretended to shop for an obsolete gadget; said he was articulate, helpful, knowledgeable, a nice young man (1). 


Nicholas presents himself as an ideal juror, attempting to appear attractive, physically neat, and put together so that the jury consultants whom he knows are watching him perceive him as reliable and trustworthy. However, Nicholas’s past is still a mystery, making the consultants doubt his intentions, even though they cannot identify specifically what about his cultivated persona reads as false.


Once selected, Nicholas makes sure to act in a way that builds trust with the other jurors. When he reveals that he attended law school, the effect is instantaneous: “Easter’s stature among his peers rose immediately. He’d already proved himself to be friendly and helpful, courteous and bright. Now, though, he was silently elevated because he knew the law” (66). While posturing himself as the leader of the jury in resolving the lunch issue (that he and Marlee caused), Nicholas further pursues influence over his fellow jurors by establishing himself as knowledgeable about the procedures of the courtroom. This knowledge causes the others to heed his advice, both explicit (i.e., when he tells Millie and Hoppy that the FBI sting is a scam) and implicit (i.e., when he tells Stella that he isn’t going to tell Harkin that he was followed, causing her to keep her Miami experiences to herself).


Nicholas also builds trust by building camaraderie with his fellow jurors, as the narrator notes, “He was one of them, undoubtedly their leader regardless of what Herman thought, and he had told them more than once that they—not the Judge, not the lawyers, not the parties—but they the jurors were the most important people in this trial” (177). In a legal process that requires sequestration and the constant removal of their agency, Nicholas gains influence simply by reminding the jurors that they have the power to decide the trial’s outcome. Nicholas’s efforts allow him to become the de facto leader of the jury, even before Herman’s removal and the vacancy in the foreman seat. As leader, Nicholas is able to guide the jury to his desired verdict and hit the tobacco industry where it hurts on behalf of Marlee and her parents.

Marlee/Claire Clement/Gabrielle Brant

Marlee is another of the main characters of The Runaway Jury. She has adopted a number of aliases in her life. She was born Gabrielle Brant in Columbia, Missouri, to parents Evelyn and Peter Brant. Both her parents died of lung cancer from years of smoking. Heartbroken and angry, Gabrielle formulated a plan to take down the tobacco industry while studying in graduate school. She moved to Kansas, where she adopted the alias Claire Clement and met and fell in love with Jeff Kerr. When they both moved to Biloxi, Mississippi, to infiltrate the Pynex trial, Jeff became Nicholas Easter and Claire became Marlee.


Marlee begins calling Rankin Fitch to build the false trust that her plan requires. As Marlee’s plots grow more devious, like having Nicholas bounce various jurors that she deems disruptive, Fitch’s approbation of Marlee grows, as he believes that she is similar to him: “‘Sounds like Marlee,’ Fitch said, as if he were admiring a daughter” (401). Fitch believes that Marlee is a money-oriented operative focused only on the financial gains available from trial manipulation. He becomes so trusting of Marlee due to her cultivation of trust with him that when the trial takes a turn, Fitch thinks, “Marlee could salvage this disaster. Only Marlee” (416). As Nicholas makes efforts to infiltrate the jury’s trust, Marlee works diligently to make Fitch reliant on her, using her charisma to make him believe that she’s on his side and that she is the sole person who can deliver a verdict in favor of the defense.


When she double-crosses him, she finally reveals the emotional motivation for her actions. She tells Fitch, 


They both got hooked on cigarettes when they were in college, and I watched them fight the habit until they died. They hated themselves for smoking, but could never give it up. They died horrible deaths, Fitch. I watched them suffer and shrivel and gasp for breath until they couldn’t breathe anymore (486). 


Marlee keeps herself emotionally distant throughout the narrative, giving no hint toward her motivations for her carefully laid plans until she succeeds. With the stress of the plan behind her, Marlee can show her emotional side to Fitch, illustrating both the complexity of her character and the complexity of her relationship with Fitch.

Rankin Fitch

Fitch is one of the antagonists of The Runaway Jury. He is a private consultant working for The Fund, a pool of money derived from the Big Four tobacco corporations that seeks to fight against any litigation against the aforementioned corporations. The Fund is untraceable, and Fitch undertakes countless immoral and illegal actions on behalf of the tobacco companies. He believes himself to be anonymous, like The Fund: “[Fitch] was an unknown, a nameless shadow who introduced himself to no one and lived under an assumed name. […] No one knew his name—except of course his employees, his clients, and a few of the lawyers he hired” (72). Fitch manages to succeed in his ventures because of this perceived anonymity, so when Marlee sends him a note addressed to him by name, he is shaken. Fitch loses his grasp on his usual plots, as the trial begins taking turns that he does not expect, especially as Marlee’s contact ramps up. For example, when the jury recites the Pledge of Allegiance like Marlee predicts, Fitch is thrown, thinking, “The fact that Marlee knew it was coming was bewildering. The fact that she was playing games with it was exhilarating” (135). Fitch juxtaposes his surprise at Marlee’s knowledge with his thrill at the idea of turning the trial into a “game.” Fitch’s gamesmanship is a key aspect of his character. He takes his job seriously, but he also enjoys the cat-and-mouse elements of his interactions with Marlee.


Fitch also has a heightened sense of himself and his role in the tobacco industry. He views himself as a general fighting a war against the hordes of litigators, as the narrator depicts: “‘Know thine enemy,’ [Fitch] said aloud to his walls. The first rule of warfare” (295). Fitch genuinely sees his goal of eliminating tobacco litigation as a righteous war that he must win. However, Fitch has respect for his supposed “enemies,” thinking that “he’d love to chat with Marlee and Nicholas over a long dinner and get all his questions answered. His admiration for them gr[ows] by the moment” (380). The use of the term “admiration” further illustrates his regard and respect for Marlee and Nicholas as adversaries, adding complexity to his role as the antagonist. He works against Marlee and Nicholas, but he finds their ability to thwart him and his schemes admirable and interesting.

The Jury

The jury as a group plays an important role throughout the narrative, functioning almost as a Greek chorus at times, though they are never unanimous and often fractious. Individual jury members show varying levels of susceptibility to influence, illustrating the pressures that juries face and the impact of well-funded efforts to manipulate them.


Gladys Card is an elderly, married white woman whose main motivations are attending her church service while in sequestration. She votes against the plaintiff, as she sees smoking as a personal choice and does not believe that the tobacco companies should be held responsible for the harm their products do. She is a non-smoker.


Rikki Coleman is a younger, married white woman with two small children. Fitch unearths proof of the abortion she had in college, which he intends to use to blackmail her, but that information does not come to light. She votes for the plaintiff, as she has disdain for cigarette companies and their advertising practices. She is a non-smoker.


Loreen Duke is a 35-year-old Black woman and mother of two teenage daughters. She works as a secretary at an Air Force base. She votes for the plaintiff, as one of her daughters started smoking after purchasing cigarettes from a vending machine in the mall, which Loreen thinks is a form of advertising to children. She is a non-smoker.


Millie Dupree is a 50-year-old, married white woman with several teenage children. She’s married to Hoppy, whom Fitch targets in a fake FBI sting. Millie trusts Nicholas because of his kind behavior and his background in law, so she confides in him about the sting. She also sides with Nicholas, voting for the plaintiff. She is a non-smoker.


Jerry Fernandez is a 38-year-old white man who works as a car salesman. He has heavy gambling debts and a disintegrating marriage. Jerry has a romantic and physical relationship with Sylvia/Poodle during the jury’s sequestration. He and Nicholas become fast friends, and Nicholas is able to persuade him to vote for the plaintiff. He is a smoker.


Herman Grimes is a 59-year-old white man who works as a computer programmer. He is blind, and he threatens to sue the court when Judge Harkin attempts to dismiss him from jury service for his blindness. He serves as the jury foreman and is a stickler for the rules until Nicholas poisons Herman, sickening him enough to have him removed from the jury before deliberation. He is a non-smoker.


Frank Herrera is an older white man and retired colonel. He is vocally anti-plaintiff, as he quit smoking himself when he was younger and believes that others should be able to do the same. Nicholas bounces him off the jury by planting written materials about the trial in his motel room during sequestration.


Stella Hulic is an older, married white woman whose bad table manners irritate the entire jury. She is removed from the jury after suffering an emotional breakdown after being followed by jury consultants (who are secretly hired by Marlee). She is a non-smoker.


Shine Royce is an older, unemployed white man and an alternate juror who replaces Herman. He votes for the plaintiff. He is a non-smoker.


Phillip Savelle is a 48-year-old white man and an alternate juror who replaces Stella. He is an unconventional individual who keeps to himself. He votes for the plaintiff. He is a non-smoker.


Lonnie Shaver is a Black man who manages a local grocery store. His grocery store is bought by one of the Big Four tobacco companies, and the company offers him a better job and more money in exchange for voting for the defense. He votes for the defense and is a non-smoker.


Sylvia Taylor-Tatum/Poodle is an older white woman who Nicholas thinks resembles a poodle dog. She has a romantic relationship with Jerry throughout the trial and votes with him for the plaintiff. She is a smoker.


Henry Vu is a former South Vietnamese fighter pilot who moved to the United States with his family and is the alternate juror called to replace Frank. He has no strong opinions on the trial but follows Nicholas’s lead, voting for the plaintiff. He is a non-smoker.


Angel Weese is a young Black woman who works as a beer distributor. Her boyfriend, Derrick, is bribed by the plaintiff to secure her vote, but she decides to vote for the plaintiff herself before he can convince her. She is a smoker.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock analysis of every major character

Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.

  • Explore in-depth profiles for every important character
  • Trace character arcs, turning points, and relationships
  • Connect characters to key themes and plot points