54 pages 1-hour read

The Shards: A Novel

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: The section contains depictions of antigay bias, sexual violence, sexual harassment, graphic violence, graphic sexual content, cursing, death, and emotional abuse.

The Malleability of Truth in Storytelling

Narrator and protagonist Bret Ellis has much in common with author Bret Easton Ellis, and the book blends elements of memoir and autofiction—a genre that uses the author’s real life as a foundation for fiction. Bret grows up in the same elite Los Angeles world as the author, in the same time period, and his obsessive references to popular music and movies not only ground the novel in its historical period, but also echo the pop cultural obsessions that have marked Bret Easton Ellis’s entire literary and media career. The book never draws a clear line between reality and fiction, or between Bret the character and Ellis the author, ultimately suggesting that memory is always at least partly fictional: To construct the story of a life, to try to make meaning out of the chaos of experience, inevitably means altering some details and inventing others as emotional truth conflicts with a factual truth that is never fully accessible.


This distinction between emotional and factual truth manifests in Robert and Bret’s conflict. From the beginning, Bret’s suspicions of Robert have more to do with emotion and intuition than fact. A string of home invasions and other crimes leads Bret to feel that that an ambiguous darkness is invading his “paradisaical” world, and for reasons he does not immediately understand, he associates this darkness with the newcomer Robert. As Bret comes to believe that Robert is the Trawler, and Robert thinks Bret is stalking him, they have different truths. Both versions generate speculation. Robert’s past indicates that he’s capable of hurting people. Bret concedes his “tendency to embellish” and add “additional details,” admitting explicitly that he is not a reliable narrator (187). Bret often changes his story or perceptions. At the Galleria, he doesn’t view Robert’s interactions with girls as stalkerish, but when he wants to create a negative portrait of Robert for Susan, he makes Robert a stalker. Both these assessments are highly subjective—the first shaped by Bret’s perception of Robert’s charisma, the second by his ulterior motives. Robert claims he wasn’t at The Shining, yet his aunt says he was, though she justifies his lie through Katherine. Neither Robert nor Bret inspire trust; as they regularly manipulate events to serve and protect themselves, a clear truth stays beyond reach.


Once Robert dies, Bret has sole control of the narrative and creates a reality that turns him into a hero. With or without Robert, Bret’s story remains fragile, and Bret loses the power to craft a convincing account once Abigail publicizes Robert’s history and the Trawler kills a fifth teen girl. By the end, Bret is as much of an outcast as Matt. Bret feels “invisible” and exists separately from the other students. His ostracization hints at the disconnect between Bret’s self-image and the way others perceive him, and it furthers the claim that he conceals critical truths to evade responsibility for his actions.

Alienation and Suspicion within Relationships

All the key relationships between characters are defined by alienation and disconnection. The teens’ parents are often absent, either physically or emotionally, and even when they are present, their presence is often harmful: Bret’s parents are physically absent, Matt’s parents are clueless about his habits, Debbie’s mother is emotionally abusive, and her father sexually abuses her friends. Thus, the parents offer little to no support. Bret and the other teens don’t fully support one another either. While they’re physically together—they attend the same school and socialize at the same places—their words and actions indicate unfamiliarity. On the first day of school, Bret says, “The narrative was in play, we were already enacting our roles” (271). Instead of being themselves, they’re forcing themselves into “roles.” As they don’t know who they are, they’re vulnerable and insecure, so they’re inherently guarded and suspicious.


Bret’s weekend with Ryan illustrates the alienation and suspicion that characterize life among his peers. Though Ryan and Bret have an intensely sexual weekend, they remain wary and uncommunicative. Bret says, “[T]here was not a lot of conversation” (403). On Monday morning, Ryan abruptly leaves without any farewell. He instantly detaches himself, as if the weekend has no meaning to him. They scrupulously, if wordlessly, police the border between sexual and emotional intimacy. This fear arises at least in part from the anti-gay bias that permeates their world. Though Bret claims to be unconcerned with social norms around sexuality, neither he nor Ryan is willing to risk their relationship being perceived as romantic. In part for this reason, Bret doesn’t tell Debbie or Susan about his weekend with Ryan, which makes them suspicious of him. With Debbie, Bret actively lies. As he can’t tell the full truth to his girlfriend or his oldest friend, he’s not deeply connected to either of them.


The weekend in Palm Springs also brings out the estrangement and paranoia that run through Bret’s friend group. As Thom doesn’t trust Susan, he has Bret spy on her. Bret promises not to tell Susan about Thom’s request, but when Susan sees Bret in Palm Springs, Bret tells her, betraying Thom. Susan then tells Debbie about seeing Bret, but Bret doesn’t know that Susan told Debbie. Back at school, Robert admits he was in Palm Springs, but he omits the crucial part about being with Susan, who jokes with Bret about his weekend. The shaky chain of knowing and not knowing highlights the daily subterfuge of Bret and his friends. Their half-truths and outright lies accelerate their atomization and make the friend group unsustainable.


With Matt, Bret fosters detachment. He admits to Susan that he and Matt “hooked up” but denies emotional investment. Bret says, “I really didn’t know him […] It was an experiment (512).” By taking Matt’s underwear as a memento, Bret undercuts his stoic claim. Bret takes Matt’s underwear because he misses Matt and wants a reminder of him. Since Bret abridges his feelings, he becomes suspect, with Robert wondering if Matt and Bret had a “falling out,” which implies that Bret was involved in his murder.

The Complex Relationship between Sexuality and Identity

In Bret’s hedonistic teen milieu, sexuality defies straightforward categories. Bret’s sexual identity mimics that of author Ellis throughout much of his public life. In an interview with the blogger Robert F. Coleman, for example, Ellis described his sexuality as “indeterminate” and stated that “any other interviewer out there will get a different answer and it just depends on the mood I’m in” (Coleman, Robert F. “Bret Easton Ellis Interview.” 11 Sept. 2010, Internet Archive). Since 2012, however, Ellis has publicly identified as gay. Like the younger Ellis, protagonist Bret resists labels for his sexuality. While he has intense sexual feelings for men, he doesn’t see himself as gay. When Terry tries to find out if Bret is gay, Bret replies, “I certainly wouldn’t kick Richard Gere out of bed” (349), choosing to name his specific desires rather than labeling his sexuality. Bret wonders what Terry has seen in him that led him to believe he might be open to sex with a man: “I’d never defined myself as gay but how did Terry know I could lean toward that?” (95). Bret doesn’t confine his sexual feelings to a word, and the word “lean” gives him mobility as he can “lean” or not “lean” in any number of directions.


Like Bret, Ryan doesn’t label himself gay. About their sex, Bret says, “The sex wasn’t based on anything except an overwhelming need” (406). What attracts Ryan and Bret is a strong, abstract “need,” not a sexual identity. In the context of their hyper-elite social milieu, this resistance to labels suggests a reluctance on the part of both boys to risk their privileged status. Bret insists on his freedom to have sex with whomever he wants, but he doesn’t want to be labeled as gay or bisexual because such a label would box him in, infringing on his total freedom. At a moment—the early 1980s—when LGBTQ+ people faced intense prejudice and stigma, this avoidance of labels suggests his unwillingness to align himself with a marginalized group.


The book suggests that sex is rarely about the people having sex. Bret and Debbie have sex, but Bret doesn’t have sexual feelings for Debbie, and to become aroused, he thinks of men. Debbie’s parents both engage in sexually inappropriate behavior with Bret and other teens, treating them as sexual objects rather than whole people with complex feelings. After having sex with Matt, Bret claims Matt “would’ve had sex with anybody” due to his remoteness (132). Unattached to the world, Matt’s sexual feelings aren’t for Bret or any specific person. Matt’s sexuality is diffuse and inclusive, like that of most other characters in the book.


The lack of sex between Robert and Bret propels their conflict. Bret admits that he has become “addicted to following Robert Mallory after school” (594). Unable to have sex with Robert, Bret expresses his desire by “following” Robert, which serves as a placeholder. Bret doesn’t care if Robert is the serial killer, he simply wants proximity. As with other sexual relationships in the book, his interest in Robert is purely superficial. He becomes addicted to the nebulous feeling—a mix of attraction and fear—that he gets in Robert’s presence. He is no more interested understanding Robert than he is in understanding Ryan or Debbie, and the monstrous version of Robert that he constructs in his mind has more to do with his own imagination than with the reality of this other person. As with most sexual relationships in the book, attraction and the pursuit of pleasure are presented as separate from identity. Sex is just sex, in Bret’s view, and has no bearing on his image of himself or of his partners.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence