62 pages 2-hour read

The Story of the Human Body

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2013

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 1, Chapters 2-4Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1: “Apes and Humans”

Part 1, Chapter 2 Summary: “Understanding Apes”

Lieberman describes chimps hunting, killing, and eating a monkey—a sight which may remind humans of their own violence and physical inferiority. Humans’ physical inferiority compared to apes started when humans became bipedal. Researchers have yet to find the “missing link,” or last common ancestor (LCA), between humans and apes, but they infer that the LCA lived in African rain forests, which are not conducive to fossilization. A simple graphic shows that gorillas and humans diverged around 9 million years ago and that humans and chimps diverged 7 to 8 million years ago. Hypothetically, the LCA would have been similar in appearance to chimps and gorillas.


Since the 1990s, four early hominin species have been discovered: Sahelanthropus tchadensis from 7.2 million years ago, Orrorin tugenesis from 6 million years ago, Ardipithecus kadabba from 5.8 million years ago, and Ardipithecus ramidus from 4.4 million years ago. The best representative of the latter species is Ardi, a partial female skeleton. Few fossilized remnants have been found, but they provide insight into hominin evolution after the LCA. The fossils suggest early hominins were bipedal and ape-like. Lieberman suggests Ardi is an intermediate biped. Signs of bipedalism in Ardi include changes to the shape and orientation of the pelvis, enlarged hip joints, S-shaped spines, and arched feet. Ardi retains many ape-like traits—muscular toes, curved ankles, short legs—which suggests they were adept climbers.


Fossilized evidence suggests early hominin diets subtly differed from those of other apes. They had larger molars, shorter snouts and canines, and stronger jaw muscles, suggesting they ate tougher, lower-quality foods than other apes, who relied on fruit. Bipedalism may have improved early hominins’ foraging abilities during a period of global cooling occurring 5 to 10 million years ago. Swathes of rain forest transformed into woodlands, which decreased the supply of nutrient-rich fruits. Bipedalism may be a result of food competition—those who could stand on two feet could reach and carry more food, and bipedalism may have helped conserve energy. While other hypothetical benefits of bipedalism have been proposed, Lieberman argues that climate change was the likely catalyst.


Lieberman agrees with Charles Darwin’s assertions that bipedalism allowed for the subsequently evolved large brains and accompanying cognitive skills in humans but argues that these were not the initial benefits of bipedalism. Discussions often ignore the consequences of bipedalism, like pregnancy challenges, loss of speed and agility, and decreased climbing abilities. However, the benefits outweighed the consequences.

Part 1, Chapter 3 Summary: “Much Depends on Dinner”

Hominin eating habits underwent significant change during the evolution of australopiths. Fossil evidence shows that australopiths lived in Africa from 4 to 1 million years ago, and several species have been identified. They are divided into two groups: gracile and robust. Gracile australopiths include Au. afarensis, Au. africanus, Au. sediba, Au. anamensis, and Au. garhi, and robust include Au. boisei, Au. robustus, and Au. aethiopicus. Lucy, a 3.2-million-year-old Au. afarensis found in Ethiopia, is the best-known representative.


Australopiths looked like bipedal chimps; they had small brains, long snouts, thick brow ridges, short legs, long and powerful arms, and they reproduced similar to modern apes, taking 12 years to mature and reproducing every 5 years. Australopiths likely relied on tougher foods, like tubers, stems, and seeds, explaining their larger teeth, jaws, faces, and chewing muscles. They had wide hips, arched feet, and short big toes, suggesting their gaits were more similar to humans’ gaits; however, some species, like Au. sediba, retained traits beneficial for climbing.


The climate changed during the australopiths’ reign, and Africa became cooler and drier with more woodland and savanna habitats, limiting the amount of available fruit and increasing australopiths’ reliance on fallback foods, or less desirable foods. Australopiths learned to dig for underground foods, or underground storage organs (USOs), like tubers. Eating USOs, which are nutrient- and energy-dense, may have allowed australopiths to expand their populations. This is extrapolated though australopiths’ physical features like their flat molars and the bony ridges in their skulls which are thought to accommodate powerful jaw muscles.


Australopiths lived in woodlands and grasslands, and they traveled long distances in their daily foraging. While some experts think australopiths walked similarly to chimpanzees, Lieberman argues that australopiths show signs of human-like pendular walking—a pattern of walking that conserves energy by creating pendular forces while walking. Such evidence includes short, in-line big toes, a partial foot arch, large, flat heel bones, straighter legs, large hip and knee joints, stable ankles, and adaptations suggesting they could stabilize their upper bodies while walking. These traits, along with fossilized footprints in Laetoli, Tanzania, suggest australopiths were relatively efficient walkers. Australopiths may have had the ability to sweat, which would have helped them travel during the heat of the day when predators were less active.


Although distant ancestors, australopiths offer insight into modern human biology as humans would not exist without these early ancestors, and modern humans possess several traits in common with australopiths.

Part 1, Chapter 4 Summary: “The First Hunter-Gatherers”

While modern humans should be concerned about human-caused climate change, hominins have survived multiple bouts of natural climate change. Climate change spurs evolution by making food more challenging to obtain. Hominins became more human-like 2 million years ago at the start of the Ice Age. African hominins were subject to drastic environmental and geological changes, which encouraged adaptations for traveling longer distances, eating tougher foods, hunting and gathering, and tool-making.


Homo erectus, discovered in 1890 in Indonesia and later found in China, Tanzania, Morocco, and Algeria, provides insight into the emergence of hunter-gatherer lifestyles. The species evolved 1.9 million years ago in Africa, then dispersed into other areas. It was variable in height and weight and similar in appearance to Homo sapiens. Other species in the Homo genus include H. habilis, H. rudolfensis, and H. neanderthalensis.


Two critical stages of evolution occurred in early Homo: H. habilis evolved larger brains and smaller snouts, and H. erectus evolved human-like legs, feet, arms, and teeth and larger brains than H. habilis. H. erectus had human-like behaviors, including hunter-gatherer social systems, defined by four behaviors: “gathering plant foods, hunting for meat, intensive cooperation, and food processing” (72).


By studying living hunter-gatherers, researchers infer that earlier species, particularly mothers, could not obtain enough calories through gathering. Hominins became omnivorous 2.6 million years ago, marking the sex-division of labor, as mothers could not hunt while caring for young offspring. Dividing labor requires food-sharing behaviors; modern hunter-gatherers practice marriage, and men hunt while women gather. Food sharing behaviors occur between extended family and community members, and such societies are egalitarian. Early hominins processed foods to make them easier to eat. The oldest food-processing tools were knife-like stones called Oldowan tools. Food processing reduced the time and energy spent eating and increased the amounts of calories and nutrition extracted during digestion. Food sharing and processing is unique to hominins.


Experts assume early Homo traveled about as much as modern hunter-gatherers—five to nine miles a day. This need to travel prompted adaptations like longer legs, arched feet, strong leg bones and joints, less surface area exposed to the sun while walking, the ability to sweat, and projecting noses that regulate the humidity and temperature of inhaled air. Researchers speculate that early Homo relied on endurance to persistent hunt, or to chase prey over long distances. This is inferred through fossilized traits—nuchal ligament, gyroscopic inner ear canals, short toes, narrow waists, and wide shoulders. Experts also infer early Homo had little or no fur and could sweat, but this cannot be confirmed through fossil records.


Hand adaptations, including increased flexibility and movement, allowed early Homo to make and use tools for obtaining and processing food. Processing foods may have led to the development of smaller molars and “snoutless” faces. Hunting and gathering led to gut adaptations. The human gut uses about as much energy as the brain and is sometimes called the “second brain.” Compared to other mammals, humans have small guts, which may be because hominins adopted more nutrient-dense diets, increasing the efficiency of digestion and allowing energy to be diverted to the brain.


Lieberman asserts that his speculations are reliable because they are based on fossil evidence and living humans. He cites examples of people—Alexander Selkirk and Marguerite de La Rocque—becoming stranded on desert islands, which emphasizes humans’ evolved survival capabilities.

Part 1, Chapters 2-4 Analysis

The discussions on early hominins and The Evolution of the Human Body and Health help answer the central question in Part 1, which is examining what humans are adapted for. The information is technical, and Lieberman covers millions of years, several species, and their adaptations relatively quickly. To avoid confusion and to ensure the reader gleans the most important information from the text, Lieberman employs several rhetorical and literary devices, including those that make the reading smoother and more accessible. He is also careful to identify speculative information and research limitations, ensuring the reader understands the somewhat limited credibility of Lieberman’s claims.


To mitigate the technical jargon, Lieberman uses acronyms, nicknames, and abbreviations. The most significant acronym in this section is LCA, referring to the last common ancestor between humans and chimpanzees. The LCA is commonly called the missing link, however, this term is considered misleading and more informal by some; therefore, Lieberman opts for the academic title. Similarly, Lieberman uses nicknames, including Ardi for the most famous Ardipithecus specimen and Lucy for the most famous Australopithecus specimen. Abbreviations appear in the scientific names for the various species, with Australopithecus abbreviated as Au. and Homo abbreviated as H. These acronyms, nicknames, and abbreviations all serve to make the reading experience smoother. Without them, some areas of the text could be perceived as excessively wordy and overwhelming.


Literary devices, including references and similes, also enhance the text’s accessibility for lay readers. By using a pop-culture reference to the rapper Eminem in the section title, “Will the First Hominin Please Stand Up?” (33), Lieberman demonstrates that he is familiar with modern popular culture. This helps him avoid sounding too academic in tone, which is important given the technical subject matter. Similes, or comparisons, help readers make connections through mental images. He compares Au. boisei faces to soup plates, and he describes chimpanzees’ diets in relation to foods commonly eaten by modern humans—“Chimps, for example, will eat leaves (think grape leaves), plant stems (think uncooked asparagus), and herbs (think fresh bay leaves)” (54). These literary devices serve to make the information clearer to those who may not be familiar with the subjects under discussion.


Another linguistic choice Lieberman makes is to explicitly state when one of his claims is speculative or inferred. Other hominin species, especially those from farther back in the timeline, can only be studied through their fossilized remains, meaning evolutionary scientists are working with limited information. In his discussion on the four oldest known hominin species, Lieberman acknowledges the evidence “is electrifying but admittedly scant” (37); however, he balances this by arguing that the speculations are considered reliable and credible because they are based on evidence. Some assertions about hominin behavior are made from fossilized evidence, such as the inference that australopiths ate tougher foods, which is based on the size and shape of their teeth. Other claims arise through comparisons with living hunter-gatherers, such as in the inference that archaic Homo diets were likely one-third animal-based and that they divided labor once they transitioned to hunter-gatherer lifestyles. By drawing attention to the limited evidence and heavy use of speculation, Lieberman demonstrates academic integrity, making himself appear more trustworthy.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 62 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs