75 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of racism, graphic violence, illness, and death.
On the surface, The Terror is about starvation, mutiny, and a beast stalking the British sailors of the doomed Franklin Expedition. However, at its core, Simmons’s novel is a dramatization of the arrogance and violence of colonialism itself. Empire, Simmons suggests, isn’t only the backdrop for horror, but is the horror. The expedition is undone not just by bad luck, poor planning, or supernatural forces, but by colonial hubris.
From the beginning, the British treat the Inuit as marginal, primitive, or irrelevant. Their language is dismissed as gibberish, their survival techniques ignored, and their cosmology derided as superstition. Even Lady Silence is rendered voiceless figuratively as well as literally, since she’s treated as an object of curiosity or fear rather than as a person. The horror here is double. On one level, the erasure of the Inuit is presented as a typical colonial pattern, denying Indigenous peoples as bearers of knowledge or power. On another level, Simmons inverts this hierarchy: The very “superstitions” dismissed by the British turn out to be true. The Tuunbaq only attacks after the British shoot and kill Silence’s father. It literalizes colonial horror by embodying what the empire refuses to recognize: That the land isn’t empty but spiritually alive, and that its laws cannot be violated without consequence.
The survival strategies ignored by the expedition are also the only ones that work, as Inuit knowledge becomes the difference between life and death. Silence is the only figure truly attuned to the Tuunbaq and the spiritual ecology of the Arctic. By refusing to learn from her, most of the British are doomed. As Crozier later thinks, regarding King William Island, “the angilak qikiqtaq, or ‘biggest island,’ that James Ross had named King William Land so long ago, ignoring the fact that the natives who had told him about it had kept calling it qikiqtaq, qikiqtaq, qikiqtak” (915). Both Ross and the later Franklin Expedition deny Indigenous knowledge and lose precious time and resources in doing so. Colonialism isn’t just cruelty to others; it’s self-destruction through willful ignorance.
Another crucial strand of horror is the degeneration of European order into moral savagery. At the start, the men cling to naval hierarchy and discipline, but as the expedition falters, these structures collapse. Hunger and cold erode loyalty. Morale dissolves into mutiny, murder, and eventually cannibalism. Hickey’s rise shows how the colonial order isn’t only fragile but also ripe for inversion. Cannibalism is the ultimate horror here because of what it signifies about empire. Colonialism often defined itself in opposition to the supposedly “savage” Other; Simmons flips this script by showing the British as the ones who resort to consuming one another. The horror is in the recognition that their supposed superiority hides the brutal realities of imperialist exploitation.
Simmons suggests that colonialism is unsustainable because it denies relationship, balance, and humility. Empire sees the world as a resource and territory, not as a living system. The horror of The Terror lies in watching that worldview unravel. When stripped of supply lines, status, and ceremony, the imperial body devours itself.
Both in history and in The Terror, the Franklin Expedition is a product of imperial ambition, with the 19th-century British Empire seeking to extend its dominion not only over lands and peoples, but over uncharted spaces. The men of Erebus and Terror believe that the Arctic can be mapped, measured, and subdued through technology, discipline, and national resolve. The novel uses the expedition’s hubris and ultimate failure to explore the clash between human ambition and nature.
Simmons portrays Franklin as the personification of this imperial ambition. He’s eager for the glory of being remembered as the man who finally discovered the Passage. His faith in canned provisions, reinforced hulls, and naval hierarchy reflects the Victorian belief that science and industry have equipped man to overcome any obstacle. However, from the beginning of the novel, the narrative foreshadows the futility of these ambitions. The ships’ advanced features of steam engines, reinforced iron hulls, and modern canned food are portrayed not as advantages, but as liabilities. The Goldner canned goods are poorly soldered and poisoned with lead, causing widespread illness and death among the crew. The coal-powered engines break down, necessitating considerable maintenance for minimal benefits. The iron hulls creak and warp under the pressure of the ice. Each supposed triumph of industry collapses in the face of Arctic conditions. Nature erodes human constructs, exposing ambition as fragile when it relies on the illusion of control. The very confidence that propelled the expedition through its reliance on industrial innovation and mastery over the environment becomes its undoing.
The Arctic, meanwhile, is vast, hostile, and beyond human control. The ice shifts, cracks, and crushes hulls with a power that dwarfs the machinery of empire. Storms and freezing temperatures create a constant atmosphere of danger. Nature in the novel is inhospitable and destructive, reminding the reader that the European explorers are interlopers here. The Arctic does not negotiate. It simply exists, demanding adaptation or death. Simmons makes clear that ambition alone, however noble or rationalized, has no weight against the crushing realities of the environment.
The Franklin Expedition, in Simmons’s retelling, becomes both tragedy and warning. Human ambition may build ships, map coasts, and dream of mastery, but the ice is a reminder of fragility and the importance of recognizing nature’s power. In the end, the clash between ambition and nature reveals not humanity’s victory but its vulnerability, and the necessity of humility when facing a world far larger than ourselves.
Though the frozen wastes of the Northwest Passage are inherently lonely, isolation in The Terror isn’t just geographical, but emotional, social, and spiritual. Severance from familiar structures of civilization, command, faith, and companionship can erode mental stability, which Simmons depicts through the deteriorating mental state of the men of the expedition. By focusing on several different perspectives, he shows how isolation affects individuals in different but psychologically destabilizing ways.
The most apparent form of isolation in The Terror is the physical entrapment of the ships in Arctic ice. For years, Erebus and Terror have been cut off from the outside world, and the Arctic is described in terms of crushing silence, endless whiteness, and a void-like landscape that denies human orientation. The Tuunbaq’s unpredictability magnifies the claustrophobia of the men’s situation: They cannot leave, cannot fight it effectively, and cannot communicate with it.
As supplies dwindle, the cohesion of the crew begins to collapse. At first, the sailors cling to routines of religious services and shared meals that mimic normalcy in an attempt to stave off the psychological effects of being cut off. However, as the months pass, starvation and fear corrode these bonds. Hickey thrives in this environment of disintegration, manipulating grievances and exploiting despair. He isolates men from one another by sowing suspicion, encouraging cannibalism, and elevating himself. Mutiny becomes the ultimate symptom of social isolation. For Hickey’s followers, isolation from traditional authority transforms into a cult-like dependence on his new order, but it, too, is a form of psychological damage. Cut off from moral boundaries, they abandon their humanity. Unlike Crozier, who struggles with alienation but seeks meaning, Hickey embraces nihilism. His isolation is self-chosen; he thrives in chaos because it validates his belief that everything is meaningless.
Silence provides an important contrast. For much of the novel, she cannot communicate with the men due to language barriers and her tongue being previously removed as part of her spiritual role. To the sailors, she’s unknowable, and they project their fears onto her, though none truly understand her. In this, she represents the men’s cultural isolation. The Franklin Expedition fails in part because it cannot adapt to Inuit knowledge, remaining cut off from the land and the people who know how to survive there. The eventual connection she forms with Crozier, on the other hand, shows how the innate human need to seek connection can break through, even in extreme isolation.
Ultimately, the novel demonstrates that isolation reveals the fragile boundaries of the human mind. It strips away the illusions of imperialism, leaving only the raw questions of survival, meaning, and connection. The Arctic becomes a metaphorical mirror: Those who confront isolation with openness may find new identities, while those who succumb are destroyed.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.