56 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Harris recounts her maiden speech on the Senate floor in February 2017, where she emphasized her immigrant background and expressed concern about executive actions affecting immigrant communities. She then delves into the challenges faced by immigrant communities under the Trump administration. She discusses the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, highlighting its importance through the story of Yuriana Aguilar, a DACA recipient and biomedical researcher. Harris argues for the economic and social benefits of DACA, noting that if recipients were deported, the US economy could lose up to $460 billion over a decade.
Harris shifts focus to the crisis in the Northern Triangle countries of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras. She provides historical context, describing the civil wars and ongoing violence that have plagued these nations. Harris explains how extreme poverty, gang violence, and corruption have led to a surge in asylum seekers fleeing to the United States and recounts her efforts as California Attorney General to secure legal representation for unaccompanied minors seeking asylum.
A significant portion of the chapter is dedicated to the Trump administration’s family separation policy at the US-Mexico border. Harris details her questioning of Department of Homeland Security officials, including Kirstjen Nielsen, about this policy in Senate hearings. She emphasizes the trauma inflicted on children and families by the policy, citing medical professionals who warn of long-term psychological damage. Harris recounts how Nielsen repeatedly denied the existence of a formal separation policy, claiming instead that the administration was simply prosecuting those who crossed the border illegally. The chapter highlights the inconsistencies in the administration’s statements, noting that families were separated even when presenting themselves at legal ports of entry for asylum. Harris also describes the administration’s initial attempts to justify the policy as a deterrent to illegal immigration, referencing Attorney General Jeff Sessions’s invocation of scripture to defend the practice.
Harris describes her visit to the Otay Mesa Detention Center, where she met with mothers who had been separated from their children. She shares their stories, including that of Olga, who hadn’t seen her four children in nearly two months, and Morena, who was separated from her sons despite presenting herself at a legal port of entry. Harris highlights the poor conditions at the facility, including the extremely low pay for detainee labor and the difficulties in communication between separated family members. Harris reports that detainees at Otay Mesa were charged 85 cents per minute for phone calls, forcing them to work at the facility to earn money for communication. Some mothers, like Morena, had to wait up to 15 days to call their children due to lack of funds. Additionally, the facility’s phone call schedules often conflicted with children’s class times, making it nearly impossible for parents to reach their children. Harris also notes that despite claims by facility staff that videoconferencing was available, detained mothers were unaware of this option. Furthermore, some parents, like Olga, were not given information about their children’s whereabouts, while others received conflicting or uncertain information about their children’s locations.
The chapter also touches on the role of the press in exposing the family separation crisis and the public outcry that led to the administration’s temporary backtrack on the policy. Harris criticizes the administration’s shift to a policy of indefinite family detention after public outcry forced them to end family separations and highlights how the administration complicated family reunification efforts by destroying records linking parents and children, necessitating the use of DNA tests to match families. The administration’s actions created significant obstacles in reuniting separated families, even after a federal court ordered them to do so within 30 days.
Harris concludes the chapter with reflections on the impact of family separation on children and parents. She argues that the policy has brought shame to the United States and calls for greater transparency and accountability in immigration enforcement, suggesting the use of body cameras for immigration agents.
Chapter 7 primarily focuses on the American healthcare system, its shortcomings, and Harris’s personal experiences with her mother’s cancer diagnosis and treatment. The chapter begins with Harris recounting the moment her mother informed her and her sister about her colon cancer diagnosis in 2008.
Harris then delves into a comprehensive critique of the US healthcare system, highlighting its high costs and poor outcomes compared to other advanced economies. She discusses issues such as rising premiums, expensive prescription drugs, and the financial burden of medical bills on American families. The chapter emphasizes disparities in healthcare access and outcomes, particularly for marginalized communities and people of color.
She alsos explores the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), and the Republican efforts to repeal it. She argues that repealing the ACA would result in millions losing health insurance and allow insurance companies to deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. Harris advocates for Medicare for All as a solution to many of the healthcare system’s problems.
Harris also extensively addresses racial disparities in healthcare, presenting statistics on mortality rates and life expectancy gaps between Black and white Americans. The chapter highlights that Black infants face double the mortality rate of white infants, and Black women are three times more likely to die from pregnancy-related complications. Harris attributes these disparities to factors including historical discrimination, toxic stress in low-income neighborhoods, and unequal treatment in medical settings. She emphasizes the role of implicit bias, citing research showing that 75% of people—regardless of race—demonstrate an unconscious preference for white people. To combat these issues, Harris proposes mandatory implicit bias training for medical students and calls for increased diversity in the medical profession, noting that as of 2013, only 9% of US physicians were non-white. She uses examples such as famed tennis player Serena Williams’s post-pregnancy complications to illustrate how racial bias in healthcare affects even high-profile individuals, underscoring the pervasive nature of the problem.
The opioid crisis is another significant topic in the chapter. Harris outlines the history of the epidemic, criticizing pharmaceutical companies and government policies that contributed to its escalation. She highlights how pharmaceutical companies flooded communities with opioids, citing that between 2007 and 2012, three major drug distributors made $17 billion by saturating West Virginia with these drugs. Harris criticizes the federal government's inadequate response, pointing out that when the administration declared the opioid crisis a public health emergency in 2017, the fund used to address it contained only $57,000. She proposes several measures to address the crisis, including declaring a national state of emergency and treating substance use disorders as a public health issue rather than a criminal justice matter. She advocates for a comprehensive approach, including providing access to medication-assisted treatment, creating federal standards for substance use disorder treatment, and reinstating the DEA’s authority to pursue pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors.
Throughout the chapter, Harris interweaves personal anecdotes about her mother’s illness with policy discussions. She describes the emotional journey of caring for her mother, including the difficulty of accepting her mother’s impending death. Harris shares her personal challenges with coordinating her mother’s care and navigating the healthcare system. She proposes the idea of patient advocates to help individuals and families dealing with serious illnesses. The chapter concludes with Harris recounting her mother’s final days and passing. She reflects on her mother’s lasting impact and expresses her deep love and admiration for her, emphasizing how her mother’s influence continues to shape her life and work.
Chapter 8 focuses on the cost-of-living crisis in America and its impact on the middle class. Harris discusses the fact that many working families struggle to make ends meet, despite holding full-time jobs. She highlights issues such as the high cost of healthcare, childcare, and housing.
The chapter emphasizes that for many, the American Dream has become increasingly unattainable. Harris references historical events, such as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s support for the Memphis sanitation workers’ strike in 1968, to illustrate the ongoing fight for dignity in work and fair compensation. Harris points out that, adjusted for inflation, the federal minimum wage is lower now than it was in 1968 and shares examples of letters she receives from constituents, detailing their financial hardships. These stories illustrate the widespread nature of the cost-of-living crisis and its impact on families across the country. Harris emphasizes that many Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, unable to afford unexpected expenses.
Harris proposes several solutions to address economic issues, including her LIFT Middle Class Act. This legislation would create a new middle-class tax credit providing eligible families with up to $6,000 annually, or $500 per month. Families could receive this credit as a monthly stipend rather than waiting for a year-end refund. Harris frames this as a different kind of safety net, aimed at preventing hardworking people from falling out of the middle class or helping them attain it. She also emphasizes the need for affordable housing, noting that in cities like Denver and Phoenix, less than 1% of homes on the market are affordable on an average teacher’s salary.
Harris addresses the gender pay gap, noting that women earn on average $0.80 for every dollar earned by men. This disparity is even more pronounced for women of color, with Black women earning $0.63 and Latinas earning just $0.54 for every dollar earned by white men. Harris provides specific figures to illustrate the impact: A Black woman working full-time, year-round, earns over $21,000 less annually than her white male counterpart (221). She argues that this wage gap affects not just the individual women, but their entire households, perpetuating broader economic inequalities.
The chapter traces the historical context of the current economic situation, discussing how the relationship between productivity and wages changed significantly in the 1970s and 1980s. In the three decades following World War II, productivity improved by 97%, with workers’ wages growing by 90%. However, this changed dramatically in subsequent decades. Between 1973 and 2013, while productivity improved by 74%, worker compensation rose by just 9%. Harris critiques the shift toward prioritizing shareholder value over worker compensation, exemplified by the Reagan administration’s economic policies, which included tax cuts for corporations and shareholders, opposition to minimum wage increases, dismantling of organized labor, and reduced government oversight.
Harris addresses the impact of the Great Recession, the rise of predatory for-profit colleges, and corporate practices such as stock buybacks. She describes how the recession led to job losses and communities becoming “ghost towns.” Harris shares her experience as Attorney General of California, taking on Corinthian Colleges Inc., a for-profit college that targeted vulnerable individuals with false promises of education and job placement. She also criticizes the practice of stock buybacks, noting that between 2003 and 2012, S&P 500 companies spent 91% of their earnings on buybacks and dividends for shareholders, leaving only 9% for investments in areas like research and development or workers’ wages. Harris argues that these factors have contributed to the erosion of the middle class and the concentration of wealth, with the richest 1% of American households now owning 40% of the nation’s wealth.
Harris discusses future challenges, including automation’s potential impact on jobs and the economic consequences of climate change. She cites research suggesting that automation could displace 2.5 million jobs annually in the short term, with industries like trucking potentially losing millions of jobs to self-driving vehicles. Regarding climate change, Harris notes the economic toll of extreme weather events, citing $300 billion in damage caused by such events in 2017 alone. She emphasizes the urgency of addressing these issues and proposes solutions such as investing in post-high school education and making debt-free college a reality. Harris argues that education beyond high school is no longer optional, and public education funding should not stop after high school. She also advocates for rebuilding the nation’s infrastructure, including roads, bridges, broadband internet in rural areas, and renewable energy projects.
Harris advocates for the importance of organized labor, arguing for a rebirth of unions to protect workers’ rights and improve wages and benefits. She notes that less than 7% of the private workforce is currently represented by unions, and recent Supreme Court rulings are likely to further reduce public sector union membership. Despite this, Harris argues against accepting the demise of the labor movement, emphasizing unions’ role in lobbying for workers’ interests and compelling management to provide better wages and benefits. She also calls for tax reform, suggesting that large corporations and wealthy individuals should pay their fair share to support economic improvements. Harris frames this as both a moral imperative and a practical necessity for fixing the economy and addressing the challenges facing the country.
The theme of Compassion in Law Enforcement is prominently featured throughout these chapters. Harris recounts her experiences as a prosecutor and Attorney General, emphasizing the importance of empathy and understanding in the criminal justice system. She describes instances where she worked to implement programs that focused on rehabilitation rather than punishment, demonstrating a nuanced approach to law enforcement that prioritizes community well-being over strict punitive measures. This approach is particularly evident in her handling of the opioid crisis and her efforts to address immigration issues. For example, when discussing the opioid epidemic, Harris argues for treating it as a public health issue rather than a criminal justice problem:
We can’t keep repeating the mistakes of the failed war on drugs that put so many people addicted to crack in prison. It is normal human behavior to want to stop feeling pain, whether physical or emotional. And people will find ways to do so (207).
This perspective reflects her belief in addressing root causes and providing support, rather than simply punishing individuals caught in difficult circumstances.
The Pragmatic Pursuit of Idealistic Goals emerges as another significant theme in these chapters. Harris articulates a vision for progressive change while acknowledging the practical challenges of implementation, particularly evident in her discussions of healthcare reform and immigration policy. She advocates for ambitious goals like Medicare for All but also outlines incremental steps and potential compromises that could lead to meaningful improvements in the short term. She writes, “I believe that health care should be a right. But in a system where the quality of your care does indeed depend on your station in life, the reality is that health care is still a privilege in this country. And we need that to change” (199). This statement encapsulates Harris’s idealistic vision while recognizing the current realities of the healthcare system.
The theme of Changing the System From Within is also evident throughout these chapters. Harris consistently emphasizes the importance of working within existing institutions to effect change. She describes her efforts to reform the criminal justice system from her position as Attorney General and her push for progressive legislation in the Senate. For instance, she writes about introducing the LIFT Middle-Class Tax Act in the Senate, “a bill that creates a major new middle-class tax credit that would provide eligible families with up to $6,000 a year, the equivalent of $500 a month” (219). This exemplifies Harris’s approach to working within the system to create tangible benefits for Americans.
Harris’s writing is rich in allusions to historical figures and events, particularly those related to the civil rights movement. She frequently invokes the legacy of leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (Where Do We Go From Here, Why We Can’t Wait, “Letter From Birmingham Jail”), drawing parallels between their struggles and contemporary challenges. For instance, she quotes Dr. King’s speech to sanitation workers, “I’ve Been to the Mountaintop,” in Memphis:
So often, we overlook the work and the significance of those who are not in professional jobs, of those who are not in the so-called big jobs. But let me say to you tonight that whenever you are engaged in work that serves humanity and is for the building of humanity, it has dignity and it has worth (215).
These references contextualize current issues within a broader historical framework of social justice and progress.
The analytical framework employed by Harris is primarily one of problem identification followed by proposed solutions. She meticulously outlines the challenges facing various sectors of American society, from healthcare to immigration to economic inequality, before presenting her ideas for addressing these issues. For example, in discussing the opioid crisis, Harris first outlines the scope of the problem, citing statistics and personal stories, before proposing solutions such as declaring a national state of emergency and creating a federal standard for substance use disorder treatment. This structure allows for a comprehensive examination of complex topics while maintaining a forward-looking, solution-oriented perspective.
Harris’s use of imagery is particularly pronounced when describing the experiences of individuals affected by policy decisions. Her vivid descriptions of families separated at the border or individuals struggling with healthcare costs underscore the human impact of abstract policy debates. For example, she describes a scene at the Otay Mesa Detention Center:
As I walked down the long driveway toward the exit, I saw that solidarity personified. Hundreds of people had gathered outside the fence, holding vigil in support of the families. People of all ages and backgrounds—children, students, parents, and grandparents—had traveled to Otay Mesa because they shared the anguish and the heartbreak of the mothers inside (179).
Harris employs several notable rhetorical devices throughout these chapters. One prominent technique she uses in these chapters, as she does throughout the book, is the use of rhetorical questions, which engage the reader and prompt critical thinking about the issues at hand. For instance, when discussing economic inequality, she asks, “How can you dream when you make minimum wage and work forty hours a week, knowing that, in 99% of the counties in the United States, you can’t afford the market rate rent on the average one-bedroom apartment?” (218). She also makes effective use of repetition, particularly in her discussions of economic inequality, to emphasize key points and create a sense of urgency around these issues.



Unlock all 56 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.