47 pages 1-hour read

This Thing Between Us

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2021

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of suicidal ideation, death by suicide, animal death, substance use, and death.

The Indescribable Intensity of Grief

Thiago’s experiences after Vera’s death demonstrate how horrifying and life-altering grief can be. Once he begins to suffer under grief’s suffocating weight, it changes him and makes him unrecognizable to most other people. The novel suggests that part of what makes Thiago’s grief unbearable is the fact that it is indescribable, isolating him from others and evading his attempts to contain it. At the same time, Thiago’s efforts to overcome his sense of isolation and chaos are halfhearted, as his suffering itself feels all-important.


Thiago senses, early on, that his grief changes him as a person. He compares losing Vera to “having an arm amputated and complaining that you can still feel the phantom hand balled into a fist” (62). An amputation is a permanent change, and having one’s arm removed means one must learn to do everything with the other hand; it changes one into a person with something missing, and this is just how Thiago feels without Vera. He can live without her, but everything is different now. He says that, to others, grief is “a storm you weather […] [e]xcept it doesn’t feel that way. No journey, no thing to endure” (62). Instead of anticipating better times ahead and the lessening of the pain he feels, Thiago considers himself forever altered, like those “trees that manage to grow around power lines and stay mangled forever” (62). Later, he describes himself as “deformed” and “hobbled […] by [Vera’s] absence” (119). Every description, every metaphor suggests a loss from which there can be no recovery.


Moreover, Thiago’s experiences point to the irrational dimensions of grief. He blames himself for Vera’s death even though it is never unambiguously established that he has cause to do so. This deepens his suffering, yet he feels an overwhelming need to preserve his guilt and grief so that his memory of Vera will not fade. After being out in the woods chasing Brimley, he tells Vera, “It couldn’t have been more than ten minutes we were out there, but it was ten minutes where you weren’t on my mind, and the guilt made my throat close” (119). Similarly, when he watches a replay of her accident in the woods, he tries to catch Vera but can’t. Though it isn’t really her in the woods, he interprets this moment as “[p]roof of how [he] failed [her]. Of [his] guilt [and] helplessness” (149). These episodes underscore the trap that grief poses, as any momentary reprieve becomes a sign of betrayal and thus cause for further suffering. As Thiago says after Vera’s funeral, Thiago says, “I didn’t want to light a candle, or release a balloon. To do one thing to mean another thing. My wife […] was dead. And I didn’t want to synthesize it into something else” (64). The passage extends the framing of grief as endlessly perpetuating itself; here, the mere attempt to make meaning of the experience risks undermining it.


Thus, Thiago becomes increasingly mired in his despair. As his reflections on the “storm” metaphor suggest, the experience of grief is difficult to communicate to others, yet even if he could describe it, it is unclear that he would want to, for fear of cheapening his relationship with Vera or dishonoring her memory. In the end, the weight of grief thus drives Thiago to suicide (or a suicide attempt since it’s unclear whether he survives the “coalescing moment”). Thiago takes all his Vicodin and washes it down with champagne, planning to get in the tub and allow himself to “slip away,” as grief has created a situation in which both healing and not healing feel equally untenable.

The Limits of Rational Control

Thiago’s grief is not the only force that resists logical explanation in the novel. Thiago’s experiences just before and following Vera’s death indicate that human logic cannot entirely manage and predict events—that some things are simply outside humanity’s ability to understand at present, thus highlighting the limits of rational control.


Prior to Vera’s death, the Alvarezes experience several events that suggest that there are aspects of the world that humans cannot explain. Their smart speaker, Itza, begins to do and say many unexplained things. Though their friends echo their stories about the Itza, no concrete explanation for its behavior emerges. More than this, their condo is peppered with cold spots, they hear scratching inside the walls that pest control fails to explain, and they have floorboards that creak when no one is stepping on them. When the Alvarezes speak to the realtor who sold the property, they learn that the previous tenant did some kind of ritual in the home involving a slain animal and pictures drawn with blood. This backstory provides a kind of explanation for the condo’s strangeness, but it is one that exists outside the bounds of reason as conventionally understood, introducing ambiguity into the story even before Vera’s accident.


After Vera’s death, even stranger things begin happening—things that should be well outside the realm of possibility. After Brimley’s apparent return from the dead, when the wall moves from the woods to the clearing and books start hurling themselves from the shelf to communicate with Thiago, he says, “[T]his wasn’t allowed, the dead communicating with the living. The dead coming back to life” (147). His word choice—“allowed”—underscores that none of what’s happening to Thiago makes sense in light of the observable, predictable laws to which humans cling; his experiences thus feel like a violation of nature or a sign of mental illness. Indeed, when he finally reveals everything to Diane, he says, “It’s on the tip of my tongue, the thing I want to call this, what’s happening, but it’s too crazy, it’s not real” (175). The very explanation that could lend some coherence to events thus seems like a further sign that there is no coherence to be found: that he is simply imagining things. 


Indeed, the more Thiago tries to make sense of everything, the less sense everything seems to make. When he thinks about the concept of the afterlife, he says, “I don’t want it to be that what I believe is what matters most. I want the truth” (217), but the novel pushes readers to confront the possibility that there is no objective truth, or at least that truth exists beyond the human brain’s ability to understand it.

The Horror of Technology and Surveillance

This Thing Between Us engages with contemporary fears about the pervasiveness of advanced technology, depicting it as invading and manipulating the characters’ homes and most private spaces. The more technology infiltrates human life, the novel suggests, the less cognizant people are that it could always be listening—and that what it “hears” could be used against them.


Thiago’s repeated references to the Alvarezes’ Itza as “her” exemplifies the dangers of technology. For one, it highlights a human complacency around such devices—a failure to reckon with technology as technology. Because the Itza speaks in a female-sounding voice, Thiago and Vera quickly begin to think of the Itza as though it were a person. The use of gendered pronouns, reserved in English for people (or, at least, sentient creatures), thus hints that humans may themselves cede territory to technology that the technology itself does not merit. Similarly, Thiago at one point describes the device’s “inhuman voice,” a description that shouldn’t be necessary because it is not human; by definition, its voice is “inhuman.” The description thus ironically underscores that Thiago has begun to think of the device as being alive—even “human,” in some sense. Moreover, by saying that it sounds “inhuman,” he draws attention to the fact that it is supposed to sound human, hinting at an intentional and problematic blurring of boundaries between human and machine. 


On the other hand, the use of “she/her” for the Itza also opens up the possibility that the device truly is a “person,” if not a human one. Thiago often refers to the device as “her” without catching himself, but there are three distinct times when he catches the error and corrects it, as if to remind himself that the speaker is not alive. For instance, when friends come over for dinner, the speaker begins responding to nothing, and Thiago says that they “traced [Vera’s] story back, but [they] couldn’t figure out what could have triggered her. It” (31). The final time he corrects his pronoun use, Thiago says that, even though the white orb went dark, “it still felt like she—it—was looking at [him]” (82). Notably, this time, he personifies the device as being able to look at him, to watch and even assess him. The more Thiago ascribes life to this object, the more dangerous it seems, as its motives remain enigmatic.


Further, the many references to the film, 2001: A Space Odyssey, suggest that AI is somehow responsible—or at least intimately bound up with—the intrusion of the entity in Thiago’s life. When Thiago tells the Itza to “mute,” it responds, “I’m sorry, Dave. I’m afraid I can’t do that” (81). Just then, Thiago sees something formless in the shadows. This line, spoken by the sentient computer HAL 9000, encapsulates the movie’s warning about AI. HAL develops the ability to think for itself and makes decisions based on its own logic, not the logic of the people who are meant to control it. When Thiago responds directly to HAL’s commands inside his hotel room, the connection between the entity and technology becomes obvious, if not clear. It paints a picture of technology as facilitating a kind of “possession,” whether because the technology intrinsically has the power to manipulate human experience or simply because humans believe that it does.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence