20 pages • 40-minute read
A. E. HousmanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The poem begins with the highs of fame, as the speaker remembers when the athlete won his “town the race” (Line 1), and the people in the town cheered him on and brought him home “shoulder-high” (Line 4). In Stanza 2, the people in the town bring him home again. This time, it’s in a casket. The athlete’s death, however, isn’t a negative. It allows the runner to “slip betimes away / From fields where glory does not stay” (Lines 9-10). Glory is not sustainable, the poem suggests. Praise and acclaim don’t tend to last long. A person can receive fame at a young age—“early though the laurel grows” (Line 11)—yet “[i]t withers quicker than the rose” (Line 12). Like a flower, a person can bloom and garner compliments and attention. The downside is that flowers shrivel—a person’s time in the limelight is limited; in a moment, it can waste away.
The speaker arguably critiques Western society’s preoccupation with fame through the ironic tone that congratulates the athlete on his choice to die young and “not swell the rout / Of lads that wore their honours out” (Lines 18-19). The speaker’s tongue-in-cheek approval of the athlete’s death draws attention to the harsh demands of celebrity. It’s at the point where people would rather die young and “unwithered” (Line 27) than live in a world that has “stopped the ears” (Line 16) or no longer cheers and worships them.
More than a century after the publication of Housman’s poem, the theme of fame remains keenly pertinent. In an article published on Fielding Graduate University’s website, “What Goes Up, Can Come Crashing Down” (30 March 2021), the media psychologist Pam Rutledge discusses how glory withers and disappears quicker than it did for Housman’s athlete who didn’t have movies, TV, or social media. Rutledge writes, “Between the social hypersensitivity to social justice issues and the knee-jerk tendency to ‘cancel’ people based on the behavior or word of others (often without nuance or regard to facts), there is a perfect storm for a crash and burn.” As with the athlete, people in the modern limelight confront an unpredictable environment.
Housman’s poem also addresses Western society’s preoccupation with beauty by connecting fame—its arrival and departure—to a “rose” (Line 12) or a beautiful thing. The athlete is famous for his skill at running and because he’s nice to look at, so people “flock to gaze” (Line 26) at his preserved (i.e., dead) appearance. Like fame, beauty is mutable, but the deceased athlete doesn’t have to worry about losing his looks; his crown will stay “unwithered” (Line 27). In “The Age of Instagram Face” (The New Yorker, 12 December 2019), Jia Tolentino says Western culture is a “world where women are rewarded for youth and beauty in a way that they are rewarded for nothing else.” In Housman’s poem, the speaker rewards the man for his beauty, which is “briefer” (Line 28)—that is, more concentrated and impactful—than the beauty of a young woman.
The theme of fame and beauty links to the theme of dying young because an early death safeguards the athlete’s reputation and beauty. As the athlete is in the grave, he won’t become one of the numerous lads “that wore their honours out” (Line 18). His curtailed time on earth prevents him from sullying his “renown” (Line 19) and his “name” (Line 20). The main reward of dying young is leaving the world on a high note. When the athlete wins the race, he’s brought “shoulder-high” (Line 4); and when the people bury him, he’s still “[s]houlder high” (Line 6). An early death also keeps the athlete’s looks from fading. His crown or “early-laurelled head” (Line 25) is “unwithered” (Line 27) because he died before his beauty wilted.
Conversely, Housman subverts the romanticization of dying young by alluding to negatives. Early death isn't a surefire way to preserve fame because “echoes fade” (Line 21). Even if the athlete himself can no longer harm his joyous memories, people can forget about him and what he did. The athlete doesn’t remain at the top. The speaker instructs the mourners to hold the trophy to “the low lintel” (Line 23) or coffin. Dying young puts the athlete at the bottom and in the ground, where he’s “strengthless” (Line 26). The athlete doesn’t pose a threat to his reputation, but he also can’t defend himself. People can “gaze” (Line 26) at him and do with him what they want. The athlete becomes an object. He lacks the agency to disrupt narratives about him. Then again, the “strengthless” position might help preserve his fame. As with other people who died young—like the rapper Tupac Shakur or the writer Sylvia Plath—people can idolize him without protest. The athlete is unable to deflate their illusions.
The speaker never gives the athlete a name. He remains a common noun: An athlete, a runner, or a “[s]mart lad” (Line 9). The superficial identity links to the superficiality of fame and beauty. The speaker’s portrait of the athlete reduces him to his looks and accomplishments; there’s nothing about his thoughts, feelings, or interpersonal relationships. It’s as if the athlete is a vessel for glory and handsomeness. If the athlete’s identity were more complex, perhaps he wouldn’t be famous because he would have cared about other things besides fame. People may be less inclined to worship a person with an intricate, unwieldy identity.
The fickle nature of identity impacts the speaker and townspeople. Neither the speaker nor anyone in the town has a developed identity. The speaker doesn’t divulge his name, and he doesn’t give the names of any of the people who worship the athlete. It’s as if the preoccupation with fame and beauty deprives every person in the poem of a deeper identity. As they primarily concern themselves with superficial things, they receive shallow identities.
Read in the context of Housman’s sexuality, the undeveloped identities aren’t a comment on the worship of fame and beauty but a necessity. Housman keeps the identities obscure so as not to expose what the poem is about: His love for Moses and the temporary death of their relationship. Considering the anti-gay laws in England at the time, pronounced identities could have jeopardized the safety of Housman and Moses.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.