29 pages 58-minute read

To Da-Duh, In Memoriam

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1967

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of racism, graphic violence, bullying, and death.

Conflict and Cultural Connections Between Generations

The core theme of “To Da-duh, in Memoriam” is the conflict and cultural exchange between the generations, represented by Da-duh, the grandmother, and the narrator, her granddaughter. In discussing the story, Paule Marshall was explicit about this theme, writing, “I wanted the basic theme of youth and old age to suggest rivalries” (95). As in many works centered on this rivalry, Marshall’s story depicts the elderly as seeking to uphold tradition and seeing the old ways as best, while the youth embrace technology, embody modernity, and overturn traditions. However, despite this tension, the narrator does adopt some of the grandmother’s ways, showing her desire for a connection to her ancestors and her culture. 


The story establishes the basic conflict by juxtaposing the grandmother’s age with the narrator’s youth. At “only nine,” the narrator has “lean hips” and must repeatedly “look up” to see her grandmother—physical details that emphasize her girlish stature and physique. By contrast, descriptions of the grandmother emphasize her worn appearance, even implying that she is near death: “The maggots might have already done their work, leaving only the framework of bone beneath the ruined skin and deep wells at the temple and jaw” (96-97). This depiction of Da-duh as deathly even in life suggests that the way of life she represents is already obsolete. In the same paragraph, however, the narrator notes a childlike quality to her grandmother’s eyes and flat chest, wondering “whether she might not be some kind of child at the same time that she was a woman” (97). Besides foreshadowing the grandmother’s naivete on certain subjects, this blending of youth and age suggests the possibility of common ground; the two characters are not such opposites as they might seem. 


As the story progresses, each character’s symbolic associations crystallize: The grandmother’s “old-fashioned” clothing echoes her attachment to the island where the family has lived for generations, while the narrator comes from a world of technology and greater racial equality. Nevertheless, there are moments of cultural exchange. While Da-duh shows her the bounty of the island, especially its sugarcane and other fruit, the narrator tells Da-duh about New York, “recreating [her] towering world of steel and concrete and machines for her” (102). The narrator comes to appreciate Barbadian culture, as represented by her paintings of “seas of sugar-cane and huge swirling Van Gogh suns and palm trees” (106), and even to adopt some of her grandmother’s expressions. 


As much as the two characters share with each other, however, it is always within the context of a competition; the narrator observes that their exchanges “always [begin] with some slighting remark on her part” (102). Moreover, despite their growing rapport, there are aspects of her grandmother’s worldview that the narrator refuses to accept—namely, her grandmother’s internalization of colonial hierarchies. She is unapologetic in reporting that she beat up a white girl who called her a name, something that her grandmother, who expressed a preference for lighter-skinned grandchildren, finds shocking. The narrator’s attitude represents a broader shift among the younger generations, including those striking workers on Barbados, who do not accept the traditional colonial hierarchies their ancestors once adapted to.

Environment as a Source of Identity

For both Da-duh and the narrator, environment is key to personal identity and worldview. Da-duh is shaped by her life on a colonial island in a rural environment, while the narrator is shaped by her life in urban, metropolitan Brooklyn. Notably, for all their superficial differences, these two environments sprang from interrelated forces. The colonial structures that brought enslaved African people to Barbados and planted sugarcane are the same colonial structures that sell processed sugar as a commodity in the metropole, in this case, New York City. Thus, both characters’ sense of self emerges from spaces largely created by modern colonialism: one metropolitan and urban, one peripheral and rural. 


Da-duh is incredibly proud of the rural environment of Barbados, and in particular its sugarcane, the product of intense colonial agricultural development. Da-duh has internalized this cash crop as part of her natural world. Her own body reflects the sugarcane of which she is so proud: She holds her “back straight, keep[s] it in line” like the tall and straight sugarcane (96). She is eager to show the narrator “St. Thomas canes,” describing them as “canes father” (99), as in the original sugarcane from which all others descend—a personification of the crop that suggests how intertwined it is with her own sense of heritage. There is even a quasi-religious element to her identification with the island; she tells the narrator “the names of the [fruit] trees as though they [are] those of her gods” (100). Because her sense of identity and pride derive from this environment, she crumbles when she learns that the narrator’s world contains things even bigger and grander. 


Likewise, the narrator is both shaped by and proud of the urban environment she comes from. Just as her grandmother lists off fruit trees, the narrator proudly lists the plethora of modern technologies that constitute her environment: “refrigerators, gas stoves, elevators, trolley cars, wringer washing machines […]” (103). She finds the environment of Barbados “alien” and thinks longingly of “the street in Brooklyn where [she] live[s],” imagining “a game of tag with [her] friends under the chestnut tree outside [her family’s] aging brownstone house” (99). Even as an adult, when she seeks to recreate the tropical beauty of the island, “the thunderous tread of the machines downstairs jar[s] the floor beneath [her] easel” (106). She cannot escape the urban environment and its technologies, which impact how she understands and represents the world, as symbolized by the paintings.

The Black Diaspora and Colonialization

A third theme of “To Da-duh, in Memoriam” is the Black diaspora and its intergenerational relationship to colonialization. This is a key aspect of the story’s setting—particularly the environment and social context of Barbados in 1937. It also informs the characterization of Da-duh and her attitudes toward colonial hierarchies. Finally, it is connected to the story’s purpose as described by the author. 


In her introduction to “To Da-duh, in Memoriam,” Marshall describes how Da-duh is “symbolic […] of the long line of black women and men—African and New World—who made [Marshall’s] being possible” (95). This framing firmly places the work within the context of the Black diaspora. The narrator’s family in Barbados are descendants of enslaved Africans brought there by the British to work on sugar plantations. Economic forces have since caused even further dispersal, with the narrator’s immediate family history echoing the broader diaspora: Just as her ancestors were taken from their families in Africa by colonial-era enslavement, the narrator’s family was forced to leave Barbados due to economic strife. Through Da-duh, however, the narrator reconnects with her lineage, which the story suggests through allusions to African cultures, such as the comparison of Da-duh’s face to a Benin mask. The narrator also integrates Africa and its peoples into her depictions of Barbados as an adult, describing the palm trees as “striding like brightly-plumed Tutsi warriors” (106). The miracle of reconnecting with one’s family and heritage after so many relocations is reflected in Da-duh’s comment, “God is good […] He has spared me to see my child again” (97). 


The story also takes place at a critical juncture in colonial history and examines the shifting attitudes surrounding it. Da-duh, for instance, has internalized aspects of colonialist ideology. The narrator states that “Da-duh prefer[s] boys but she also like[s] her grandchildren to be ‘white’” (97), reflecting the racist, misogynistic hierarchies of the British Empire. She later chastises her relatives for not being “colonized”—that is to say, “civilized” along British lines. Her valorization of sugarcane, a colonial cash crop, further illustrates the extent to which she aligns herself with colonial structures. In contrast, the younger generations seek to overturn this hierarchy, as represented by the strike action the story references, when Black workers advocated for better treatment by white British business owners. This illustrates the Black diaspora’s shifting relationship to colonization across generations. The context of the story’s writing is also notable in this respect: In 1967, the year of the story’s publication, movements such as anticolonialism and Black nationalism led to tension between assimilative older generations and revolutionary younger ones.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence