47 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a developmental disorder causing difficulty in focusing, sitting still, and controlling impulses. Diagnosis often occurs during elementary school years. In Troublemakers, Shalaby critiques how ADHD diagnoses often pathologize typical childhood behaviors and/or behaviors that arise from perceived injustice in classroom demands. ADHD is therefore central to Shalaby’s exploration of Disruption as Communication and Resistance. Zora, Lucas, and Sean all face ADHD diagnosis and medication for their restlessness, but Shalaby argues that a more contextual understanding of their behavior reveals the toxicity of boring, stressful school environments, while medicating children to ensure their compliance merely strips them of their freedom and dignity.
The concept of hypervisibility, as explored in Troublemakers, aligns closely with the theme of Imposing Conformity Through Exclusion in School Culture. Shalaby argues that students who deviate from mainstream (e.g., white, upper-middle-class, etc.) norms become subject to heightened scrutiny and negative attention in the school setting. Their hypervisibility often then results in a “troublemaker” label, further entrenching the cycle of exclusion and marginalization. Figures like Zora, Lucas, Sean, and Marcus reject their teachers’ erasure of their difference, but their disruptive resistance, counterintuitively to them, engenders greater surveillance and punishment. For Shalaby, the lens of hypervisibility reveals the systemic nature of exclusion in educational settings and the urgent need for more inclusive and understanding approaches to diversity in schools.
By the “school-to-prison pipeline,” Shalaby refers to the system of policies and practices in the US education and criminal justice systems that mutually reinforce marginalized students’ criminalization. “Troublemaking” students face escalating punishments that aim to force compliance: public scoldings, detention, suspension, and finally expulsion. This exclusion, rather than addressing the root causes of students’ behavior, denies students academic instruction time and fuels resentment. Excluded students may not obtain a diploma and consequently may face limited prospects beyond underground economies or even imprisonment. This pipeline disproportionately impacts students of color with fewer means, as differences in identity, from gender to class to race, themselves become suspect in an educational system that values conformity. Troublemakers urges a dismantling the school-to-prison pipeline by reimagining classrooms to focus on healing harm rather than defaulting to punishment.
Core to Shalaby’s argument is the idea that classrooms reflect the ideology of society at large: capitalism, white supremacy, and patriarchy, but also, more broadly, hierarchy as an end in and of itself. Shalaby sharply critiques this dominant social order embedded within school behavioral norms, routines, and codes for conduct. She examines how the classroom’s demands for unquestioning obedience, conformity, and silent complicity actively undermine inclusion, community, and justice. When so-called “troublemakers” like Zora, Lucas, Sean, and Marcus intentionally disrupt the classroom, their disruptions threaten the white, middle-class cultural norm and therefore meet with harsh punishment. Shalaby therefore calls on educators to reimagine classrooms to focus on collaborative critical thinking and problem-solving geared toward collective liberation from oppression. In this, she suggests, children themselves can lead the way. When children like Sean or Lucas ask “why?” or walk out of readings entirely, they are not simply being difficult; they are modeling the creative imagination and civic participation required to contest and remake the public world.
“Willful defiance” is a vague disciplinary charge for disobedience that Shalaby argues has fueled exclusionary discipline in the education system, particularly against students of color. Young people may receive suspensions or expulsions for “defiance” as minor as mouthing off or wearing a hat. Shalaby investigates such incidents to reveal how institutional language and policies perpetuate a culture of compliance and uniformity and to demonstrate how students’ defiant behaviors can be understood as a form of communication: resistance against an education system that often fails to acknowledge and accommodate their individual identities and needs.



Unlock all 47 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.