54 pages 1-hour read

Under the Banner of Heaven: A Story of Violent Faith

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2003

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Prevalence and Inevitability of Religious Extremism

Content warning: This book contains multiple accounts of sexual abuse and murder, which are discussed in this section.


Krakauer asserts throughout the book that religious belief is, at its core, irrational and that it lends itself to extremism. Krakauer suggests that Ron and Dan Lafferty are on a long list of religious extremists, including Osama bin Laden, David Koresh, and Jim Jones. Similarly, Krakauer explores the history of Joseph Smith and the Mormon faith and implies that religious extremism was prevalent at the religion’s inception. In the prologue, Krakauer questions how a “sane and avowedly pious man,” such as one of the Lafferty brothers, could commit such a heinous crime. He suggests that the answer is the abandonment of rational thinking. In Chapter 2, Krakauer refers to religion scholar Philip Jenkins who argues that American extremism is such an important part of the country’s history that it can never be described as being fringe.


Krakauer shows that almost as soon as the Mormon Church was born, religious sects began to splinter off, many of which perpetuated extremist views. Krakauer also revealed how Joseph Smith himself held extremist views, including blood atonement and plural marriage, and performed extremist actions, such as when Smith took underage girls as his plural wives. Smith’s polygamy principle became the foundation of Bountiful and other fundamentalist communities, leading to many violent and sexually abusive situations. Religious zeal meant that many were able to enact their extremist practices without reproach, such as in the case of David Mitchell.


Dan Lafferty described himself repeatedly as a 110 percenter in the LDS faith. He believed strongly that the key to happiness and fulfillment both in life and the afterlife was strict adherence to the teachings of Joseph Smith. Just as was the case with Porter Rockwell, who attempted to kill Missouri Governor Liburn Boggs after Joseph Smith prophesized the governmental official’s death, Dan believed that it was his duty to act out his brother Ron’s revelations, which he trusted were directives from God. Dan and Ron’s extremism led the brothers to force plural marriage upon their families, exert complete control over their children and wives, inflict physical, emotional, and verbal abuse upon their spouses, and, ultimately, commit the murders of Brenda and Erika Lafferty. Even after the murders, Dan was confident that he had done the right thing. He described sleeping peacefully the night following the blood atonement.

Violence and Power in Patriarchal Expressions of Religion

When Emma Smith told Joseph Smith that he must stop engaging in polygamy or she would take plural husbands, Smith received a new revelation from God. This time, the revelation was directed at Emma. She was to submit to her husband and understand that any woman who took plural husbands was in direct opposition to God’s will and would burn in hell. Smith’s message was clear. The Mormon faith did not elevate and empowered women. In fact, women were expected to remain subservient to their husbands who were members of the priesthood and heads of the household.


Throughout the book, Krakauer shows how these patriarchal expressions of religion nearly always lead to violence and oppression. In the FLDS, Rulon Jeffs and his successors married women, often against their will, to men who already had multiple wives. Jeffs stressed the importance that women “Keep Sweet, No Matter What” and never question the ruling of the Prophet (33). In many cases, these men were twice, even three times, the age of the young girls that were forced to marry them. Mary Ann Kingston was forced to become the 15th wife to her 32-year-old uncle. Mary Ann Kingston was 16. Stories like Mary Ann’s are rampant among FLDS and other fundamentalist Mormon sects. Jeffs warned against watching television and consuming media not produced by the FLDS. In the Lafferty family, the boys were forced to watch as their father, Watson Lafferty Sr., clubbed the family dog to death.


In Chapter 3, Krakauer quotes the Salt Lake Tribune, which theorizes that Mormonism was never about polygamy but about authority. The stories revealed in Krakauer’s book seem to prove this point: dissent is not tolerated, and women should submit. Brian David Mitchell, a fundamentalist who believed God was calling him to kidnap a young girl and take him as his wife, was able to brainwash her by capitalizing on her patriarchal religious training in the LDS.


Brenda Lafferty represented a challenge to this hierarchical structure. While a pious follower of the LDS faith, Brenda was also spirited and educated. Ron and Dan saw Brenda as a threat to what they believed to be the sacred order of things. Because patriarchal structures are dependent upon ideas like power, control, dominance, and strength, violence is an inevitable outcome.

Turning a Blind Eye

Another theme in Krakauer’s work is ignoring and overlooking warning signs and the dangerous implications of religious extremism. Krakauer suggests that by erasing polygamy from their messaging and never addressing many of Joseph Smith’s more controversial teachings, the modern LDS creates an open pathway for fundamentalist sects to embrace these concepts. Rather than confronting the ideas head-on and empowering LDS followers to consider the possibility of an imperfect Prophet, LDS leaders ensure that there will always be those who see Joseph Smith and other prophet leaders as infallible.


This theme is similarly expressed by the Colorado City Police Department when the police chief, a fundamentalist Mormon and practitioner of polygamy, Sam Roundy, suggested that what happens within a person’s home is their private business. In many of the stories Krakauer shares, including the women who ran away from abusive homes, individuals are returned to dangerous situations in the name of family privacy. The story of Debbie Palmer exemplifies this. After experiencing the abuse of her husband, her family returned her to his home.


Brenda Lafferty’s sister Betty described a similar situation. When Brenda detailed her marital troubles with Allen—leaving out the physical abuse—Betty encouraged her to make it work, despite knowing that Brenda’s husband was engaging in extremist practices. Krakauer’s book is a warning against turning a blind eye toward religious fanaticism, especially because of its proclivity toward violence.

The Intersection of Mormon Faith and Government

Due to perceived persecution from the government, Joseph Smith took his followers to Missouri and then Illinois in pursuit of religious freedom. Smith’s perspective was skewed, however, by his belief in the holiness and chosenness of the LDS. After Smith’s death, Brigham Young took the Mormons to Utah to, once again, seek religious freedom. What Young was after was not freedom but autonomy. Krakauer explains that Young sought to establish himself as the sole leader of the Utah territory. Both he and Smith filled government positions in their settlements with LDS authorities. When the government challenged them for practices that conflicted with state and federal law, the LDS leaders balked and even reacted violently. The Mountain Meadows massacre, the Utah War, and the killing of Joseph Smith all contributed to the violent and bloody history that is the intersection of the Mormon faith and the government. Almost from the faith’s inception, the two were at odds.


Throughout the book, Krakauer weaves historical LDS stories with the lives of the Lafferty brothers. Krakauer suggests that the historical context is as important to understanding what happened to Brenda and Erika Lafferty as it is to understanding the Lafferty brothers’ psychology. Because Dan immersed himself in LDS research, he understood the historical implications of the choices he made and interpreted his actions as part of a larger epic of celestial existence.


The historical relationship between the LDS and the United States government lays a foundation for Ron and Dan Lafferty, as well as Prophet Onias and the other Lafferty brothers, to challenge the authority of the government. Dan believed that the government was wrong in forcing its citizens to pay property taxes, income taxes, licensing fees, and traffic fines. Dan ignored speed limits and refused to pay taxes on his father’s home and business. The Lafferty brothers fell in line, but Brenda repeatedly challenged Allen in his decision to leave taxes unpaid and her car’s registration unrenewed. After the murder of Brenda and Erika, Dan maintained that—while he did commit the murders—he did not commit a crime. In Dan’s eyes, the government and his faith were two opposing forces, and only one of them was good and right. Like Joseph Smith’s belief in plural marriage—illegal under the law—Dan believed that his religious faith took precedence over those governmental institutions which sought to, in his view, limit his ability to enact his faith.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence