59 pages 1-hour read

Upheaval: Turning Points for Nations in Crisis

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 2, Chapters 6-7Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 2: “Nations: Crises That Unfolded”

Part 2, Chapter 6 Summary: “Rebuilding Germany”

When Germany surrendered to the Allies in May 1945, the country was in shambles. Almost all its cities were destroyed, one-quarter of its former territory was lost, its economy had collapsed, it was divided into four occupation zones, and about 10 million of its citizens were homeless (217-8). Nevertheless, Germany became “the most powerful country in Europe west of Russia” (218). Shedding its authoritarian past, it developed a liberal democracy and strong economy. Diamond explores how Germany successfully navigated this crisis.


In 1949, the Allies joined their three zones of British, French, and American occupation into one country, which became West Germany. The Russian zone, which included Berlin, became East Germany. The city of Berlin was divided among the allies and became a means for East Germans to escape Soviet repression and go west. To prevent this exodus, the Soviet Union built the Berlin Wall in 1961. Over 1,000 East Germans died trying to escape to the West. With the Cold War in place, the US allocated economic aid to West Germany. The US needed West Germany to regain its strength and serve as “a bulwark against communism” (222).


While the Allies prosecuted the top leaders of the Nazi Party for crimes against humanity, large numbers of Germans were simply re-educated. It was not until 1958 that a German Jewish lawyer, Fritz Bauer, began prosecuting ordinary Germans who had taken part in the atrocities. These trials attracted publicity and “demonstrated to the German public again and again, in excruciating detail, the beliefs and deeds of Germans during the Nazi era” (229). Following this, West Germans were taught to face up to past crimes.



However, in the 1960s, Germany still had “authoritarian behaviors and attitudes” (236). Student revolts in the 1960s against the Vietnam War, authority, and traditional morality became more violent than in other countries. The generational division was intense, as parents of these students were part of the Nazi generation. While those who became violent terrorists were arrested, the student movement contributed to “liberalizing trends” (236). In 1969, Willy Brandt became West Germany’s first left-wing chancellor (237).


Brandt not only advocated for the students’ goals, such as the promotion of women’s rights, he also transformed foreign policy. He signed a treaty with East Germany, established diplomatic relations with Eastern bloc countries, and accepted the losses of German territory. In 1970, he visited the former Warsaw ghetto. There, he “spontaneously fell down on his knees, acknowledged the millions of victims of the Nazis, and asked for forgiveness” (238). Subsequent chancellors continued his approach to foreign policy. West Germany was established as a trusted Western partner and a valued trading partner to the east. Later, when the Berlin wall came down in 1989, Chancellor Helmut Kohl negotiated a means for East and West Germany to be reunited.


Germany experienced “several overlapping and gradually unfolding challenges from 1945 to 1990” (241). However, its condition in 1945, the erection of the Berlin Wall in 1961, and student revolts during 1968 presented immediate crises. Four of Diamond’s factors are present in this case to an extreme degree (242). Germany is extremely geographically constrained, sharing land borders with nine countries with no natural defense barriers. These constraints, per Diamond, cause bad leadership to be much more costly for the country (244). Germany reflects two opposite extremes in its sense of self-pity and victimization. Following World War I, the country considered itself a victim, given the severity of war reparations. However, after World War II, Germans accepted responsibility for the atrocities their country committed.


Germany also constitutes an extreme case in the role of leadership and honest self-appraisal, or lack thereof (247). Hitler, of course, was an evil leader. His unrealistic appraisals caused the defeat of his country in the war. On the other hand, Brandt exhibited “realism and political courage” (249). After World War II, Germany made selective changes, shedding its authoritarianism, increasing the status of women, and accepting its loss of territory. It retained core values, such as governmental support of medical care and community values. The country also took advantage of economic aid from the US after World War II. Its strong sense of national identity “helped it survive the trauma of devastation, occupation, and partition” (251).

Part 2, Chapter 7 Summary: “Australia: Who Are We?”

In the early 1960s, Australia’s overwhelmingly white population identified with Great Britain. Beginning in World War II, Australians began to realize that their identification with Britain “was becoming out-of-date” (257). Recognizing its proximity to Asia, Australia changed its exclusionary immigration policies, which had kept the country overwhelmingly white, and became a diverse nation.


Australia emerged from six separate British colonies, New South Wales, Tasmania, Victoria, South Australia, Western Australia, and Queensland. They did not unite as Australia until 1901 (266). At this time, Australia had an allegiance to Great Britain and incorporated the British flag on their own. They were also “unanimous about excluding all non-white races from Australia” (267). Passing the Immigration Restriction Act in 1901, authorities ensured the exclusion of non-white races by the administering of a dictation test in a language unknown to such immigrants.


Considering themselves a part of Great Britain, Australians fought in Britain’s wars. Australians still celebrate ANZAC Day every April 25th, the anniversary of the Gallipoli landings during World War I when Australians suffered heavy casualties due to incompetent British leadership. The event symbolized Australian willingness to sacrifice for “their British motherland” (271). A turning point came in Australia’s relationship during World War II when the British surrendered its naval base to the Japanese at Singapore. This surrender was considered a betrayal, as the base was used to protect Australia. Britain’s powerlessness to protect Australia was thus exposed. When Japan bombed Australia, Australians turned to Americans for protection in that war.


Following the war, over several decades, Australia loosened its ties with Great Britain and ultimately got rid of its White Australia policy. Fearing the large populations of surrounding countries, Australia sought to increase its own. Given the racism still prevalent immediately after World War II, the country looked first to northern and southern Europe. Five factors then undermined the all-white policy. Britain clearly was no longer a military protector. Former British colonies in Asia were achieving independence and becoming trading partners. By the 1980s, for example, Australia’s leading trading partner was Japan. The new immigrants from northern and southern Europe had no allegiance to Britain and did not “share the strong racist prejudices against Asians” (280). Finally, Britain was pulling away from Australia. The final straw was its application to join the European Economic Community, which would result in treating Australia as a foreign nation.


Diamond explains that the dismantling of the White Australia policy occurred in stages, beginning in 1949 with the admission of Japanese war-brides. In the 1950s, the dictation test was dropped and 10,000 Asian student visitors came. The policy was officially renounced in 1972 and Australia then took in Indochinese refugees between 1978 and 1982. By the late 1980s, almost half of Australians “were either born overseas or had at least one overseas-born parent” (285). Asians have been especially influential in politics and culture. For example, Asian students have 70% of the seats in Sydney’s top schools (285).


Applying his framework to Australia, Diamond notes that the most important issue has been the debate over core values and national identity. Gradually, Australia has defined itself increasingly as an independent nation more involved with Asia than Europe. An honest self-appraisal allowed Australians to recognize the declining influence of Britain and the importance of Japan. The case demonstrates the importance of selective change and building a fence, as Australia has retained symbolic ties to Britain but has become multi-ethnic. Indeed, the British monarch is still its head of state.

Part 2, Chapters 6-7 Analysis

In these case studies, Diamond attempts to apply Learning from Comparative History to Australia and Germany. In both cases, the crises unfolded over time and often centered upon issues of national identity


Following World War II, Germany was in shambles and would soon be divided into two separate countries. For an extended period of time, Germans resisted assuming responsibility for the crimes of their nation during World War II. It was only when Brandt, as the new Chancellor, accepted full responsibility for Germany’s crimes and began to recalibrate Germany’s sense of national identity to involve more liberal and introspective qualities that a positive change could be made. Such gestures of accountability and progressive changes coincided with prosecutions of ordinary Germans for atrocities, ensuring that more widespread acceptance of responsibility for WWII became woven into national identity.


Australia also underwent a crisis in national identity and core values during the 20th century. The failure of Britain to protect Australia during WWII and, later, Britain’s application to the European Economic Community caused Australians to rethink their identity. As Diamond explains, the country became more diverse and created stronger ties with Asia as a result. However, in keeping with Diamond’s emphasis on the importance of selective changes, Australia remains a commonwealth country with the British monarch as its head of state, which suggests that Australia, like Germany, successfully learned how to adapt its national identity while still maintaining older elements of nationhood. 


While there had to be an honest appraisal, an acknowledgment of crisis, an acceptance of responsibility, and selective changes, yet again not all 12 factors had to be present for success. For example, there were not really models for Germany to follow in its acceptance of responsibility for unprecedented crimes. These cases demonstrate that The Nature of Successful Navigation During National Crises can vary according to time, place, and extenuating circumstances.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 59 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs