50 pages • 1-hour read
Susan WiggsA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section includes discussion of child abuse; emotional and physical abuse; rape; antigay bias; and gender discrimination.
One of the chief sources of conflict in the novel is the pressure placed upon women who do not comply with cultural and religious norms. Through the experiences of the novel’s women, the text examines the cost of contravening social norms, especially for those who do not conform to rigid standards of sexual behavior and identity.
For the mothers in the novel, the cost of not adhering to the Catholic Church’s expectations around reproductive sexuality is devastating. For these women, having a child while unmarried is strictly taboo. Deirdre is forced to give up her son when she becomes pregnant by a Protestant young man, while Fiona is also forced to give up her daughter, Ruby, after giving birth in secret at her aunt’s house. Both of these women are persuaded that surrendering their child for adoption will promise the child a more financially and emotionally secure life, but they are left to bear the shame and stigma of being unmarried mothers while the men involved face no consequences. While Deirdre and Fiona suffer from being deprived of children they would have preferred to keep, Genesee (Sister Bernadette’s) mother shows the cost of single parenthood for the mother and child. Genesee’s relief at leaving behind a life of food insecurity, neglect, and the threat of abuse speaks to the difficulties of single parenthood at this time.
Angela’s experience speaks to the costs of being authentic and true to oneself in a discriminatory environment. Angela’s Gram sees her grandchild’s sexuality as a problem that has to be solved, justifying her anti-gay bias by invoking the teachings of the church. Then, because she has been left pregnant by rape, Angela suffers the fate of Fiona and Deirdre in being separated from her child, with Sister Gerard, the Mother Superior, deciding it will help Angela recover if she is told her child died.
The emotional pain in which this leaves Angela is immense, and this is only remedied when Angela once again goes against social norms by challenging the authority of the Sisters of Charity and the Buffalo Diocese of the Catholic Church to expose her experience of abuse. This ability to speak for herself, contravening the commands of silence that were imposed on her at the Home, finally allow Angela some remedy and repair. Thus, while rebellion against social norms can be painful or even devastating, such rebellion is also sometimes necessary for personal freedom or achieving social justice.
Hand in hand with its narrative threads of abuse, the novel explores the healing power of accepting the past. While the characters experience trauma and difficulties in different ways, each one finds a way forward and eventually builds a life marked by resilience and contentment.
The varied experiences of the characters show the several ways in which one might heal through confronting and accepting the past. Liam, after returning from war, finds that attending a support group through the local VA office gives him a way to talk about his concerns and come to terms with his experience in healthy ways. Odessa’s torture at the Good Shepherd ends when she ages out of her sentence and is able to reconcile with her parents, once again pursuing her love of music. Helen conceives of her experience at the Good Shepherd as part of her training in mental toughness, which helps her succeed at West Point and in her military career. Janice makes her own reconciliation with the nuns in choosing to join the order, but she moderates their strictness by adhering to the principles of compassion and mercy in her advocacy work. Thus, all of these survivors of trauma find a way to heal that feels right to them.
The novel also suggests that speaking out about experiences and finding connection can be important keys to accepting the past. Mairin’s healing comes about when she can recognize the need to speak about her time at the Home of the Good Shepherd and have her hurt seen and validated by those who understand and relate. Just as her relationship with her mother is healed when Deirdre speaks to Mairin about the child she lost, Mairin is able to come to terms with the hurt she experienced when she can talk about her experience at the Good Shepherd with the other people in her life, like her husband. This ability to confront the past with appropriate emotional support proves the reconciliation she needs to find peace.
Angela’s reconciliation holds a manifold emotional weight as her discovery about her still-living daughter provides long-sought answers for Everly, who has been curious her whole life about the circumstances of her birth. Angela’s remarks at the conclusion of the court case also reflect the idea that healing from the past is not about undoing it, but about being able to process and work through it in a healthy, empowering way.
The nuns at the Home of the Good Shepherd present a public front of selfless service to others: “[T]he clients were led to believe that [the] Good Shepherd provided moral education and job training for wayward girls, a worthy service to the community” (85). Behind closed doors, however, corruption, exploitation, and cruelty run rampant, which leaves a lasting impact on the “wayward” girls who pass through the Home. In examining the girls’ experience at the Home, the novel explores the legacy of institutionalized violence.
The authority figures in the novel often hide behind their social status and supposed service to the community while inflicting harm on others. From the outside, Dr. Gilroy is a respectable married man with six children. He is supposed to offer medical care and guidance to the girls at the Home, but instead he uses his access to vulnerable girls to abuse them, culminating in his rape of Angela. The nuns behave in a less extreme, but still abusive manner. They present a hypocritical front of piety to the world while enacting harsh discipline and punishments against the girls, with abuse ranging from physical acts like hair-pulling, to denial of food, to confinement within small spaces for extended lengths of time.
Instead of the schooling which they are legally supposed to receive, the girls are forced to work in the laundry facility, earning income for the diocese which purports to support them (and from which, as Mairin learns, the Mother Superior is stealing funds). It is also suggested that locking the girls in their dormitory behind the iron gate violates fire safety regulations, which the nuns dismiss, showing a further lack of concern for their general well-being. Worst of all, when Angela tries to report Dr. Gilroy’s rape, the nuns instead accuse Angela of having a secret affair with a boy from outside the Home. In choosing to automatically believe Dr. Gilroy over Angela, the nuns ensure that his sexual abuse of the Home’s inmates will continue unimpeded. The novel also suggests that the girls’ experiences in the 1960s are part of an ongoing form of institutional violence, as Deirdre reports a similar experience of oppression in the Magdalene laundry back in Ireland.
Angela’s lawsuit in Book 2 suggests that one avenue to address this legacy of institutional violence is to pursue justice through the court system. As Angela reports, there is no winning when it comes to reparations for harm done, but the act of speaking out can begin new processes to address and root out the problems.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.