56 pages 1-hour read

We Live Here Now

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, addiction, substance use, pregnancy loss, and graphic violence.

Emily Bennett

Emily Bennett is the protagonist and primary narrator of We Live Here Now. At the start of the novel, she is characterized by physical and emotional fragility in the wake of her near-fatal accident. Emily’s sense of being “broken” illustrates The Legacy of Trauma and the Past. Her lingering physical pain and the scarring on her leg are tangible reminders of the traumatic accident in which she lost a pregnancy. She is also “consumed by a guilt that stops [her] sleeping” due to the workplace affair she concealed from Freddie (12). Emily’s insomnia, combined with the possibility that she is experiencing sensory distortions post-sepsis, casts uncertainty over whether she is a reliable narrator.


Emily’s trajectory from the anxious target of Larkin Lodge’s supernatural phenomenon to a complicit perpetrator in the house’s cycle of violence demonstrates the complex and flawed nature of her character. The first stage of this character arc is her evolution from a passive sufferer of circumstances into an active investigator, piecing together the truth of the house’s history and its role in the lives of the Carters, Carmichaels, and Hoppers. This phase of Emily’s character development underscores her intelligence, resourcefulness, and determination. Uncovering the secret of Larkin Lodge’s power, she resolves that she and Freddie will escape the fate of the previous residents. However, her ruthless streak is exposed once she realizes Freddie has killed and “edited” her. Emily illustrates The Dark Undercurrents of Intimate Relationships as she murders and revives only the best part of her husband to ensure that her unborn child has two good parents. By killing Freddie, Emily becomes complicit in the Lodge’s sinister dynamic.


By the novel’s end, Emily exists in two states simultaneously: the “best” version of herself who starts anew with Freddie, and the darker half trapped in the primary suite. The reborn Emily embodies hope, renewal, and optimism as she looks forward to the birth of her child and plans to move abroad. By contrast, the trapped Emily is bitter and resentful, realizing she has betrayed herself by choosing not to reunite her two halves. Her predicament highlights The Duality of Human Nature and the dangers of denying the darker aspects of the self.

Freddie Bennett

Like his wife, Emily, Freddie is a flawed and complex character. From the outset, his weakness and dishonesty are illustrated as he conceals his gambling debts from his wife. However, Freddie’s reflection, “I am not a good person” (8), also demonstrates remorse, signaling that he possesses some form of moral compass. Several factors affect Freddie’s increasingly amoral character arc, leaving readers to decide how far Larkin Lodge is responsible for influencing his actions. The observation that his “mood toward Emily” lifts when he leaves the Lodge for London conveys the house’s malign impact on his thoughts and feelings (68). At the same time, Freddie’s description of his mounting debts as a “noose […] slowly tightening around my neck” conveys a further pressure that drives his actions (205).


Freddie embodies the theme of the dark undercurrents of intimate relationships. Rather than confronting his problems directly, he externalizes blame, casting Emily as an obstacle rather than a partner. As the narrative progresses, he increasingly perceives his wife’s suffering as a potential solution to his debts. Asserting, “Maybe if she went mad, that would save me” (140), he disparages her mental health to others and plans to stage her death by suicide to claim her life insurance payout. However, Freddie’s building resentment of Emily derails this plan when, in a violent outburst, he impulsively stabs his wife. The moment emerges from a mixture of jealousy, paranoia, and wounded pride when he discovers her infidelity with her boss and the existence of the blackmail money. Freddie’s actions continue the destructive legacy created by Larkin Lodge’s previous male residents, Christopher Hopper and Joe Carter, who similarly responded to domestic conflict with lethal violence.


After stabbing Emily, Freddie convinces himself that the murder was a hallucination. This delusion highlights a key aspect of his character: his refusal to take responsibility for his actions and acknowledge his darker side. Freddie’s eventual imprisonment in the primary suite alongside Emily reveals the ultimate consequence of his choices. His darker half remains bickering with Emily’s trapped self, while his sanitized double enjoys a new life.

Sally Carter

Emily marvels at Sally’s relaxed attitude toward her husband Joe’s sexual relationships with other women. On first meeting Sally, Emily wishes she could be more like the older woman, enviously noting, “Everything about her is easy […] Relaxed and happy” (96). However, later in the narrative, Emily learns that in the early days of her relationship with Joe, Sally was consumed by jealousy and insecurity over his desire for sexual freedom. These contradictory portrayals of the same character hint at the dark secret at the heart of the novel: Sally was killed by Joe and reincarnated with her jealous streak eliminated.


Sally’s character highlights the novel’s exploration of the dark undercurrent of intimate relationships. Pinborough undercuts her marital bliss in the present by revealing that her husband murdered her to achieve it. Sally also embodies the duality of human nature as her “best” self lives contentedly with Joe, free from jealousy, while her vengeful, imprisoned self haunts Larkin Lodge. The narrative emphasizes that while the sanitized version of Sally is superficially happy, she is incomplete and oblivious to her true circumstances. Her adulation of the husband who killed her is reminiscent of the robotic, compliant female characters in Ira Levin’s dystopian novel, The Stepford Wives. The migraines Sally experiences when she visits Larkin Lodge hint at the unnatural state of her fractured identity. As the former female resident of the Lodge, Sally serves as a parallel figure to Emily, foreshadowing the protagonist’s fate.


Once Sally’s trapped self is freed, Emily describes her as “still Sally with added ingredients. An edge. An anger” (276). The author emphasizes that while this version of Sally is less likable, she is fully human. Sally goes on to reverse her victimhood by killing Joe, passing his death off as a tragic accident.

Joe Carter

Emily describes Sally’s husband, Joe, as possessing “a sexual charisma that gives him the air of some movie star” (30). A hedonistic artist, Joe initially represents temptation to the protagonist as she becomes increasingly dissatisfied with Freddie. Joe’s desire to paint Emily and his undisguised attraction to her make her feel like “[a] living, breathing woman who is raw and real and perfect for her flaws rather than despite them” (173). In his company, she no longer feels irreparably damaged. Joe’s allure is intensified by his ability to maintain his wife’s unconditional devotion despite openly sleeping with other women.


Emily’s discovery that Joe killed Sally prompts her realization that he is the embodiment of destructive male entitlement. Joe is not a calculated killer—he lashes out at Sally in a moment of heightened frustration. However, his decision to suffocate her when she is injured is driven by the urge to avoid a lifetime of unwanted caretaking. Joe’s insistence on sexual freedom emerges as a narcissistic desire that directly clashes with Sally’s need for monogamy. His killing of Sally when she does not conform to the lifestyle he craves links him to the earlier resident of Larkin Lodge, Christopher Hopper, reinforcing the cyclical nature of domestic violence within the novel.


Joe’s actions also foreshadow Freddie’s murder of Emily. After killing Sally, Joe relies on denial as a coping mechanism, convincing himself that the incident was a hallucinatory “acid trip.” This inability to face his own culpability is accompanied by a lack of remorse as Sally’s death and reincarnation result in him gaining “the perfect wife” (126). However, Larkin Lodge acts as a repository for his crime, recording and preserving his actions. Ultimately, Sally’s violent revenge on her husband demonstrates that he cannot escape the legacy of the past.

Fortuna Carmichael

Fortuna Carmichael is a former actress and the previous owner of Larkin Lodge. The elderly woman is in her nineties, with “a face like a wizened walnut” when Emily visits her in her nursing home (89). However, a photograph of Fortuna from the 1950s, depicting her as “all curves and lipstick” (72), hints at a passionate and seductive younger self. On a symbolic level, Fortuna represents the weight of history that hangs over Larkin Lodge and its inhabitants. Her name, with its connotations of “fortune” and fate, suggests the way trauma seems to shape lives within the house.


Fortuna functions as a narrative bridge between earlier generations of Larkin Lodge’s residents and Emily’s present-day discoveries. Her preservation of her husband Gerald’s possessions highlights her role as a custodian of Larkin Lodge’s secrets. Through her character, Pinborough subverts the Gothic motif of the widow who remains tethered to her dead husband. While Fortuna remains devoted to Gerald’s memory, her retention of the items is unsentimental, indicating that the happiness of her marriage stemmed from keeping the “dark” aspects of his personality imprisoned within the house. Fortuna’s silences and hostility toward Emily’s questioning demonstrate how individuals collude with the Lodge’s cycles of violence by preserving its legacy rather than exposing and breaking it.


Fortuna’s role as a murderer provides a variation on Larkin Lodge’s ability to exacerbate violent impulses in its male inhabitants. Her motivation for killing Gerald is never specified. However, Mrs. Tucker’s observation that the Carmichaels “had one of those passionate relationships you think you want until you’re in one. All fire and ice” suggests an adversarial relationship (203), mirroring the dynamics of the other couples Larkin Lodge attracts. Her survival indicates resilience in the face of the house’s destructive power. One of the novel’s most ambiguous characters, she underscores Pinborough’s interest in blurred boundaries. She exists in a liminal space, neither freeing herself nor fully succumbing to the Lodge’s dark legacy.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock analysis of every major character

Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.

  • Explore in-depth profiles for every important character
  • Trace character arcs, turning points, and relationships
  • Connect characters to key themes and plot points