We Who Will Die

Stacia Stark

65 pages 2-hour read

Stacia Stark

We Who Will Die

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, animal death, physical abuse, and emotional abuse.

The Moral Compromises of Survival

In We Who Will Die, survival inside the empire of Senthara hinges on moral compromises that strip away a person’s ethics and sense of self, and author Stacia Stark invokes the systemic injustices of ancient Rome to create a world built to exploit the desperate, proving that those with everything to lose have no latitude to entertain the rigid, abstract ideals of conventional morality. Arvelle Dacien’s circumstances aptly demonstrate this issue since her efforts to protect her family push her to make choices that utterly shatter her own personal code of ethics, and she finds herself engaging in everything from calculated manipulation to outright killing in order to carve out a better existence for her brothers. Stark presents these moments as the hard cost of living in a world where the powerful target the vulnerable for the sake of sport, and it is clear that in order to survive such a heartless regime, Arvelle must voluntarily sacrifice parts of herself for the sake of her family’s future.


Arvelle’s deal with the vampire Bran stands as the first and most damaging compromise that she makes, as all her subsequent suffering stems from this one fateful decision. In Bran’s first fraught meetings with Arvelle, he offers to help her only if she infiltrates the Sundering and assassinates the emperor. He seals the threat by saying, “A deal is a deal. If you try to run, I will kill both of your brothers” (24). His coercion drives her choice, and in her desperate bid to keep her brother Evren alive, she renders herself vulnerable to Bran’s vampiric bond, a magical form of enslavement with far-reaching effects that only become apparent to her much later when she dares to defy his will. Stark anchors Arvelle’s subsequent shows of violence in her reluctant link to Bran, and as she struggles to chart a clear course through a gauntlet of moral compromises, the empire’s traps force her to exhibit the very brutality that she has always wanted to escape.


Notably, Arvelle’s bargain taints every subsequent interaction that she has, spreading its damage as she drags others into her fight. For example, when she manipulates the bitter Leon, her former mentor and Kassia’s grieving father, into helping her train for the Sundering, her calculated act suggests that her desperation has twisted her into someone whom her deceased friend would not even recognize since she deliberately uses Leon’s pain as leverage to achieve her own ends. She knows that Leon has lived in seclusion for six years and that his grief still governs him, but she needles him by threatening to train with someone whom the narrative implies is an old rival. Recognizing that this tactic will goad him, she ruthlessly employs the strategy because she knows that making use of his experience is the only way to keep herself alive in the arena. Having become desperate enough to wound someone who already lives under the empire’s cruelty and has suffered for her sake in the past, Arvelle must ultimately set her own scruples aside in her bid to survive.


Although Arvelle’s mission grows so toxic and perilous that it drastically compromises what little honor she has left, she nonetheless finds ways to mitigate her sense of guilt over her forced complicity in Bran’s schemes. For example, when she must fight the griffon Antigrus during the Sundering, she quails at the idea of killing such a magnificent creature. However, he links telepathically and understands her reluctance to engage in the violence of the arena, and when he asks her to end his suffering quickly and mercifully, she is relieved of a measure of guilt over the heinous act that the emperor and his regime are forcing her to perform. Although she does slay the griffon, her lingering anguish later inspires her to help the other maginari escape from their confinement below the arena. Thus, Arvelle carves out what moments of redemption she can, even as she remains caught between Rorrik’s and Bran’s morally compromising demands. As she tenaciously negotiates her survival, every path forward requires her to make decisions that reshape her understanding of herself.

The Corrupting Influence of Power

With every powerful figure that the novel presents, the author drives home the point that power itself can be a corrosive force that encourages cruelty, manipulation, and the erasure of others’ humanity. Drawing upon the worst historical excesses of ancient Rome, Stark builds an imperial world in which political strength, supernatural ability, and social standing are concentrated in the hands of a small but vicious ruling class, and these individuals—both vampires and humans—use what they hold with casual violence. The emperor’s displays of control and the smaller abuses carried out by city wardens sit on the same spectrum, suggesting that a system tilted toward domination warps the people who benefit from it even as it irreparably harms those relegated to the lower classes.


Although his appearances are rare and his presence is mostly felt through the stories of other characters, Emperor Vallius Corvus offers the clearest example of this world’s unchecked power. He deliberately governs through fear in his demeanor and his policies, and even the Sundering is an elaborate display of public violence that serves as both entertainment and object lesson. As blood is shed and lives are wasted in the arena games, these proceedings become tools to intimidate the emperor’s subjects and broadcast his authority. Likewise, his response to public unrest shows the reach of his cruelty; when people shout about rising taxes during a chariot race, he orders his wardens to burn whole sections of the crowd, turning the event into a massacre. Even his more mundane actions do little for those he rules; as Arvelle notes, “His taxes are crippling. He provides few services to the poorest of his subjects, all while bragging about the progress he has created within the empire” (30). Thus, with every appearance he makes, the emperor treats people’s lives as resources to be spent and squandered at will, and this corrupt worldview fuels his callous disregard for the very people he is meant to govern.


The emperor is not the only character to be tainted by the lure of absolute power, as lesser characters with supernatural strength use similar strongarm tactics to get what they want. For example, Bran manipulates Arvelle by controlling access to Evren’s medicine, creating a crisis that forces her to accept his terms. Rorrik, the emperor’s son, uses his own superiority to indulge his bloodlust and trap Arvelle in his schemes, and he arranges for her to kill Tiberius Cotta by placing her under a glamour that twists her perceptions. Both of these men view Arvelle as nothing more than a pawn in their own intrigues, and because they have the power to force her to do their bidding, they assume that they also have the right. Since even the anonymous wardens exercise their power to the detriment of the people around them, Stark’s vision of Senthara grows out of these linked abuses. In this world, every show of power carries the risk of exploitation, and every position of authority creates room to harm someone else.

The Enduring Weight of Unresolved Grief

As Arvelle’s arduous backstory demonstrates, any forms of grief that remain unspoken and unexamined will gain the power to trap people in harmful patterns that limit their ability to grow or reconnect with others. Because Arvelle’s entire world has been upended by the death of her best friend, Kassia, and the disappearance of her first love, Tiernon, she begins the novel feeling suspended in the very moment she lost them both. To cope with the unceasing pressure of these losses, she builds a cold, controlled exterior and pushes everyone but her brothers away from her in order to avoid feeling anything that would expose her to the risk of such loss again.


From the very beginning of the narrative, Arvelle’s grief shapes almost every part of her identity. Even though the lovelorn Carrick has no hope of winning her heart, he does serve as a crucial truth teller in the novel’s early moments when he states that he has not seen Arvelle smile in six years and describes her as being “frozen in time” (18). Notably, his words match her own thoughts since she believes that forging any close connections will only make her vulnerable; devastated by the tragedies of her past, she decides to forsake her very future, feeling that she does not have “another heartbreak in [her]” (19). This emotionless wall protects her from the fear of further loss, but it also separates her from joy, tightening the invisible boundaries that severely limit her life.


However, Arvelle soon discovers that her coping mechanisms are maladaptive at best, as her unhealed grief and emotional distance both become liabilities when she returns to the arena. During her first fight in the Sundering, she finds herself frozen when she stands on the spot where Kassia died. Overwhelmed by the shock of that memory, she loses her focus on the moment and leaves herself open to Maximus’s attack. Crucially, it is only when she hears the cries of her supporters on the sidelines that she snaps back to the present and manages to survive the fight, and this dynamic suggests that her only viable path toward survival is to embrace the human connections that she is now being offered.


Yet before these healing shifts can occur, Stark provides a mirror for Arvelle’s grief by pairing her stagnation with Leon’s isolation; both characters’ paths show the emotional pain that can occur when a grieving person shuts down for years and refuses to face the anguish of the past. Yet Leon’s story brings out new angles of this six-year-old tragedy. As the narrative reveals, he has withdrawn from public life in the aftermath of Kassia’s death, letting his home and his spirit diminish just as Arvelle’s emotional world has collapsed into silent bitterness. Even Arvelle notices that grief has “sucked the marrow from [Leon’s] bones” (26), and it is clear that his retreat mirrors her own.


Yet when Arvelle manipulates Leon into training her, they both begin to reengage with the world, and their return to life validates the sentiments in Kassia’s letter, which gives Arvelle some much-needed comfort. Just before her death, Kassia penned the words, “You have to let yourself be happy, Velle. Or else, what was it all for?” (306). In an almost prophetic fashion, Kassia ask Arvelle to move through her grief and embrace a new path in life, and Stark makes it clear that this is the only way for Arvelle to reclaim any part of a full life.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence