58 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Peterson notes that little is known about Jonah’s life before he answers God’s call to prophecy. In this, Peterson argues, he is like many other ordinary people called by fate to undertake extraordinary tasks. God calls Jonah to convert the city of Nineveh, the capital of the Assyrian Empire and a sworn enemy of Israel. Thus, Jonah must save a people to whom he is not kindly disposed. Jonah tacitly refuses the call and flees in the opposite direction. Peterson contrasts Jonah’s behavior to that of Socrates, who stayed to meet his fate in Athens instead of running away, thus obeying his conscience.
As Jonah is on a ship, God sends a violent storm. Jonah confesses to the shipmates that he is fleeing his God, and he offers to be thrown overboard as a sacrifice. He is swallowed by a whale and remains in the animal’s belly for three days, praying to God for rescue. Finally, the whale spews Jonah onto the shore, and the prophet heads to Nineveh.
Peterson offers his interpretation of the narrative thus far. Jonah’s rejection of God’s call shows the dire consequences of ignoring conscience and keeping silent in the face of evil. Jonah, although fallible, remains essentially good, as shown by his realization of his error and willingness to sacrifice himself on board the ship.
Although Jonah faces a peril by preaching to Nineveh, it would redeem both the Ninevites and him in the long run. This illustrates that God’s commands are in our best long-term interest, even if requiring a sacrifice in the present. If one avoids correcting sin at the outset, the difficulties will only multiply with time. Jonah learns from his experience that God can be discovered through confronting the “stark reality of evil” (475), symbolized by his sojourn inside the whale. By undergoing this form of “hell” and trusting in God through it all, Jonah is redeemed and changes the course of his life.
Yet, in addition to being a symbol of evil, the whale, as a source of food and energy, also represents the valuable commodities of tradition and the institutions that sustain society. Hence, Peterson draws another inference about the story of Jonah: It is unwise for a society to take its “traditions and accrued resources for granted,” living “unconsciously on the wealth of the past” (478). Unearned privilege has a downside, namely that one becomes unconscious of the blessings that one enjoys—like a person living in the belly of a large whale.
Peterson develops a secondary argument that, although the Bible presents events that could not have literally happened (like Jonah surviving after being swallowed by a whale), one can maintain belief in such events as metaphors representing the foundation of Judeo-Christian civilization. Scoffing at such stories represents its own kind of naivete and betrays a moral and cultural “lack of discernment.”
The Ninevites repent and are spared God’s wrath, but Jonah persists in bitterness and moral superiority and asks God to let him die. The final episode in the story illustrates that such contempt is counterproductive and that God wants Jonah to be more generous. Jonah sits outside the city in the hope that it will still be destroyed. God provides a tall plant to shade Jonah from the hot sun. However, when he sends a worm to destroy the plant, Jonah is almost suicidally upset. God scolds Jonah for so valuing something over which he had no control and declares that he values the people of Nineveh more than the ephemeral plant. Peterson draws from this a lesson about modern society: The natural environment is not to be valued above people. His summation of the Jonah story as a whole is that “[t]here is […] no real difference between the silence of the good and the victory of evil” (492).
In the closing paragraph of the section, Peterson sums up the purpose of the book as a whole in its exploration of the foundational stories of the West as found in the Bible.
Peterson gives capsule summaries of each of the book’s sections and restates the major themes. He emphasizes that the world is neither a mere collection of facts nor strictly deterministic. Instead, we live within a “domain of vast possibility” in which we must wrestle with God and give meaning to the facts of existence through story (496). The stories of the Bible enunciate a “set of responsibilities” that include “upward-striving sacrificial transformation that reconciles the human and the divine” (496). We are to go forth in pursuit of adventure and maintain the moral order, written in the human soul and recorded in the biblical text.
To close, Peterson makes a plea: Learn the sacred story, “get it straight,” and “live it out” instead of merely paying lip service to it (502). In the face of rapid change, we must “become fully aware” and renew our covenant with God because, far from being dead, God is reborn (Deus renatus est).
Peterson closes the book with the story of a reluctant profit, Jonah, presenting this last story as emblematic of human strengths and weaknesses. Jonah is a good man but resentful of enemies and bitter that God should show favor to them. His sense of moral superiority compels him to ignore the voice of his conscience, and his subsequent downfall illustrates The Dangers of Pride. Jonah’s journey toward moral maturity is like those of other characters in the Bible, oscillating between moral insight and backsliding, but God stays with him as with the Ninevites. In rejecting God’s call to preach to the Ninevites, Jonah violates the principle of subsidiarity, placing his own judgment above that of God. The Ninevites have persecuted his people, and from his human perspective, his refusal to help them appears just. From Peterson’s perspective, Jonah errs by trusting his own seemingly reasonable moral judgment—a product of his present state of moral development—rather than aiming for a higher morality. The central value of the book, articulated dozens of times across its 500-plus pages, is “upward striving.” By ignoring the voice of God, or conscience, Jonah refuses to strive upward and instead remains stuck where he is. The belly of the whale symbolizes this prison of self-satisfaction, and only through prayerful contrition—the opposite of pride—can he escape it.
Peterson has shared that he is planning a book on the Christian New Testament, and this concluding episode serves a secondary function in pointing toward that planned future book, as some Christian scholars and theologians have interpreted the story of Jonah’s “death” and “resurrection” as foreshadowing the later death and resurrection of Jesus. Like Jesus, Jonah is sent on a mission to convert a lost people. The continuity between these stories, composed hundreds of years apart and under very different social circumstances, underscores the importance of Storytelling as the Foundation of Individual and Collective Consciousness. For Peterson, the stories contain shared themes and even parallel plots because they express universal and timeless human truths. In this, he draws from one of his most important intellectual predecessors—the early 20th-century Swiss psychoanalyst C. G. Jung, who argued for the existence of a “collective unconscious” composed of universal archetypes and primordial stories embedded in the structure of the brain and shared by all humans.
Peterson concludes by briefly summarizing each of the stories he has included in the book, reiterating the common themes among them. Chief among these is the theme most clearly articulated in the story of Jonah: the “upward-striving sacrificial transformation that reconciles the human and the divine” (496). Jonah’s story illustrates the need to make a sacrifice in the present for the sake of the long-term future, as Jonah agrees to be thrown into the sea as expiation for his sin. This sacrifice creates the conditions under which he can be reconciled with God. Peterson presents this story as the culmination of a pattern among all the stories in the book—each pointing toward the need for sacrifice and reconciliation. In the book’s final lines, he offers a rebuttal to German philosopher Friedrich Nietzche’s famous pronouncement in The Gay Science that “God is dead,” responding with the Latin phrase Deus renatus est, or “God is reborn.”



Unlock all 58 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.