Plot Summary

What Every Body Is Saying

Joe Navarro, Marvin Karlins
Guide cover placeholder

What Every Body Is Saying

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2008

Plot Summary

Joe Navarro, a retired FBI special agent with 25 years of experience in counterintelligence and behavioral analysis, draws on neuroscience, psychology, and fieldwork to present a comprehensive guide to reading nonverbal communication. Co-written with psychologist Marvin Karlins, the book argues that body language, which accounts for roughly 60 to 65 percent of all interpersonal communication, is often more honest than spoken words because it is produced subconsciously rather than deliberately crafted.


Navarro traces his interest in nonverbal behavior to his arrival in the United States as an eight-year-old Cuban exile who could not speak English. He learned to read the body language of classmates and teachers, noticing that people who liked him arched their eyebrows, while those who were unfriendly squinted. This childhood skill became the foundation of his FBI career. The foreword, written by Karlins, opens with an illustrative case: During an FBI interview, Navarro observed a murder suspect's eyelids close hard when an ice pick, the actual undisclosed murder weapon, was mentioned. The suspect's involuntary reaction made him the primary person of interest, and he eventually confessed.


Navarro presents ten commandments for observing and decoding nonverbal communication. He stresses that effective reading requires conscious, deliberate observation. Context is essential: Trembling after a car accident reflects expected stress, not deception. He distinguishes between universal nonverbal behaviors, such as lip compression signaling distress, and idiosyncratic signals unique to specific individuals. He advises readers to establish baseline behaviors so that deviations become apparent, watch for clusters of tells, note sudden behavioral changes, and distinguish comfort from discomfort. To validate the reliability of nonverbal behavior, Navarro cites the U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio (1968), in which a detective's observations of suspects repeatedly casing a store established a legal precedent allowing stops based on observed behavioral cues.


The book then turns to the biological basis of body language. Following Paul MacLean's 1952 model, Navarro describes the brain as a triune structure: the reptilian (stem) brain, the mammalian (limbic) brain, and the human (neocortex). He identifies the limbic system as the most important region for nonverbal communication because it reacts reflexively, without conscious thought, making its responses genuine and difficult to disguise. The neocortex, capable of deliberate deception, is the least reliable source of honest signals. To illustrate this distinction, Navarro describes the case of Ahmed Reesam, whose limbic system produced visible nervousness and excessive sweating at the U.S.-Canada border in December 1999, even as Reesam verbally denied carrying explosives. An alert customs officer, Diana Dean, detected these signals and intervened, leading to Reesam's arrest and conviction for plotting to bomb the Los Angeles Airport. The limbic system generates three sequential survival responses to threats: freeze, flight, and fight, correcting the common phrase "fight or flight." The freeze response evolved because stillness avoids detection; modern manifestations include people holding still when caught lying. The flight response appears as distancing behaviors such as leaning away or turning feet toward exits. The fight response manifests as verbal aggression, territorial posturing, and violation of personal space.


After negative limbic arousal, the brain produces pacifying behaviors, also called adapters, to restore calm. These include touching or stroking the neck, face, or hair; rubbing the legs with the palms; and exhaling with puffed cheeks. Navarro identifies neck touching as one of the most significant pacifiers. Women, he notes, frequently cover the suprasternal notch, the hollow area between the Adam's apple and breastbone, when distressed or insecure. He illustrates this with an anecdote: While searching for a fugitive, Navarro noticed that the suspect's mother touched her suprasternal notch each time he asked if her son was in the house. A search revealed the son hiding in a closet. Navarro emphasizes that pacifying behaviors reveal what topics cause a person stress, even if they do not definitively indicate deception.


Navarro then proceeds through the body from the feet upward, reversing the conventional top-down approach. He argues that the feet and legs are the most honest body part because their reactions are hardwired and people rarely monitor them, whereas the face is the least reliable because people learn from childhood to mask facial expressions. "Happy feet," or wiggling and bouncing, signal positive emotions and high confidence. Feet shifting toward or away from a person indicate engagement or disengagement. Crossed legs while standing signal comfort because the posture reduces balance, something the limbic brain permits only when no threat is perceived. Foot freeze, the sudden cessation of movement, signals stress.


Moving upward, Navarro explains that the torso houses vital organs and is diligently protected by the brain. Leaning toward someone indicates interest, while leaning away signals discomfort. Ventral fronting, exposing the front of the body toward something favored, and ventral denial, turning away from something disliked, reliably indicate true sentiment. Full, equal shoulder shrugs indicate honest commitment to a statement, while partial or one-sided shrugs suggest evasiveness or insecurity.


Arms rise freely when a person is happy and drop or become restrained when upset. Restricted arm movement in children can indicate abuse, as the limbic system minimizes movement to avoid attracting attention. Arms akimbo, with hands on hips, is a territorial authority display. The hooding effect, interlacing hands behind the head with elbows out, signals dominance. The hands receive disproportionate attention from the brain because of their evolutionary importance. Hiding the hands creates negative impressions, while hand steepling, touching spread fingertips together, is the most powerful high-confidence display. Frozen hands, the sudden cessation of gesturing, often accompany deception as the limbic freeze response suppresses movement.


The face, capable of more than 10,000 expressions, is the most expressive yet most potentially deceptive body region. A genuine smile engages both the muscles that pull the mouth corners upward and those that crinkle the outer edges of the eyes, while a fake smile pulls the corners sideways without this eye involvement. Lip compression signals stress, lip pursing signals disagreement, and the sneer signals contempt; researcher John Gottman found that sneering during couples' therapy predicted relationship breakups. Pupil dilation occurs involuntarily when a person sees something positive, and constriction occurs in response to negative stimuli. Navarro recounts using this knowledge during a national security investigation: A spy's pupils constricted upon seeing cards bearing two specific names, revealing co-conspirators who later confessed. When verbal and nonverbal messages conflict, Navarro advises trusting the negative emotion as the more genuine response.


The final substantive chapter addresses deception detection with a strong warning: Most people, including professionals such as judges and law enforcement officers, perform no better than chance at identifying lies, and no single behavior definitively indicates deception. Navarro presents three practical elements from his "Four-Domain Model of Detecting Deception": comfort versus discomfort, synchrony, and emphasis. Truthful people tend to be more comfortable than those harboring guilty knowledge. Synchrony refers to congruence between verbal and nonverbal messages; saying "I didn't do it" while subtly nodding suggests dishonesty. Emphasis is the limbic brain's contribution to honest communication: Truthful people naturally punctuate their statements with gestures, eyebrow flashes, and vocal intensity, while liars tend to be less emphatic. Navarro cautions that lack of eye contact is not indicative of deception and that habitual liars actually increase eye contact while lying. He concludes by warning against labeling anyone a liar based on limited observations, since even experts are only slightly better than chance.


The book closes with an analogy: A friend visiting Coral Gables, Florida, cannot find street signs until learning they are small stone blocks at ground level rather than on elevated poles. Once she knows where to look, the signs become obvious. Navarro draws a parallel to nonverbal communication: The signs have always been present, but most people have never been taught to look for them. He expresses hope that readers will learn to read both verbal and nonverbal languages, enriching their understanding of the world and their interpersonal relationships.

We’re just getting started

Add this title to our list of requested Study Guides!