59 pages 1-hour read

What She Left Behind: A Haunting and Heartbreaking Story of 1920s Historical Fiction

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2015

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of gender discrimination, mental illness, sexual violence, physical abuse, child sexual abuse, death, self-harm, and suicidal ideation.

Institutional Control of Women’s Bodies

All of the major female characters in What She Left Behind experience some form of misogyny, sometimes in their personal lives (as with the bullying and sexual abuse Izzy experiences), but just as often in their interactions with public institutions like prisons and hospitals. Ultimately, the novel draws a throughline between the abuse women experience in public and in private, suggesting that what connects the two is an effort to control women’s bodies.


Clara’s storyline furnishes the most explicit example. Her ordeal begins because her father wants to control whom she marries; a match with his business partner would be financially advantageous, and he disapproves of her boyfriend, the working-class immigrant Bruno, anyway. When Clara resists this attempt to commodify her body, he locks her in his home for three weeks, which “[makes] her feel like an inmate being kept in a prison” (11). The comparison to prison underscores the systemic nature of this abuse; Henry is not merely a renegade actor in his efforts to control Clara. When Clara still refuses to give her body to the man Henry has chosen, he has her put in the Long Island Home and then into Willard, suggesting that such institutions served in large part to manage women’s sexuality and reproductive capacity.


Sure enough, Clara is subject to much more rigorous policing in these hospitals. She is not only forcibly kept from her loved ones—most of her letters to Bruno are never sent—but she is also abused in myriad ways. She loses all privacy; her body is put on display in front of patients and staff frequently. Additionally, Clara is hit, slapped, and fondled. Physical abuse extends into so-called treatments, which are more like tortures: ice baths, being chained to a bed, and isolation. Clara also experiences medical trauma, including being drugged with laudanum and put in an insulin coma—all attempts to discipline her body into compliance. Clara’s forced sterilization and the kidnapping of her child reveal the ultimate logic of such control. The hospital frames her sterilization as a form of benevolent eugenics, arguing that it is “keep[ing] the unfit from passing along the insanity gene” (166). Roach, however, has no problem raising her “unfit” child as his own. Like Henry’s imprisonment of her, the function of such abuse is therefore merely to bring Clara’s reproductive ability under patriarchal control.


That so much of the misogyny Izzy endures in the 1990s is sexually inflected underscores this point. While the practice of hospitalizing “troublesome” women has largely ended, the disciplining of the female body persists. For instance, Shannon pushes Izzy into the boys’ locker room, forcing her into a sexualized position she did not choose. Moreover, places like Willard still exist. When Izzy visits her mother in prison, it “remind[s] her of Willard State. The only differences between the asylum and the prison [are] the watchtowers and the curling barbed wire above the metal fences” (242). Joyce is in prison because she killed her husband for molesting their daughter—a reminder that women who resist patriarchal authority control of their bodies still face institutional repercussions.

Defining Female Autonomy as Mental Illness

In addition to exploring the function of much patriarchal abuse of women, the novel also considers its mechanisms. Without denying the reality of mental illness, the novel suggests that historically, a label of mental illness has often served as a way of silencing and isolating women—and that this means of discrediting women has not wholly disappeared.


Once again, Clara’s experiences exemplify how patriarchal society pathologizes women’s resistance. After Clara refuses to marry Henry’s business partner’s son, he declares that she has a mental illness, calling the police and saying that “she’s having some kind of episode” (30). Whether he actually believes this remains ambiguous but is ultimately irrelevant; either he sees her anger as evidence of mental illness, implying that even justified outrage is unacceptable in a woman, or he simply uses mental illness as a pretext. He is certainly lying when he says that Bruno is a figment of Clara’s imagination, but the lie is revealing; he may not see Clara’s relationship with Bruno as literal mental illness, but he certainly sees it as far outside the bounds of acceptable behavior, so he redefines it as pathological.


Several other patients at Willard are similarly there because they demonstrated some form of autonomy. For instance, Esther is committed by her husband because “he caught her kissing another man” (145). This act is not considered evidence of mental illness when men do it. For instance, Roach cheats on his wife with his nurse. However, when a woman makes decisions about her sexual life, she may be deemed ill by the men whose authority she defies. The pattern recurs within the walls of institutions like Willard, where resistance—even the mere insistence that one has no mental illness—becomes further evidence of mental illness rather than a rational response to imprisonment and abuse. This is true even at the comparatively benign Long Island Home, where Dr. Thorn responds to Clara’s confirmation that she is angry about her situation by asking, “Do you believe your father is plotting against you, Clara?” (43), a question that implies she is showing signs of paranoia.


Izzy’s willingness to believe that both Clara and her own mother have mental illnesses illustrates how widespread the tendency to pathologize female autonomy remains. This belief has the effect of excusing patriarchal abuse. For instance, she thinks that “madness [is] the only explanation for her mother shooting her father while he slept” because she has repressed her father’s abuse (8). Nevertheless, Izzy recognizes that the consequence of a label of mental illness is the loss of autonomy, which is one reason why she fears developing a mental illness: “[S]he could end up like her mother, spending the rest of her life alone and locked up, either in a mental ward or a prison” (96). Ultimately, Izzy comes to recognize that this loss of autonomy is the point—a way of neutralizing women’s resistance.

Intergenerational Trauma and Resilience

Trauma is widespread in the novel, but the characters’ responses to it differ. Izzy, Shannon, and Clara all experience trauma, but only Izzy and Clara display enough resilience not to end up hurting other people themselves. The novel suggests that this is because both Izzy and Clara find ways to live for others who have experienced similar trauma.


The novel explores the physical and mental effects of trauma in detail via both Izzy’s and Clara’s experiences. For instance, Izzy spends most of the novel struggling with her desire to self-harm, and once she learns the truth about how her father traumatized her, she wonders “if she’d been cutting herself to repress the horrible memories of what her father had done” (227). Moreover, the trauma of this compounds, as her self-harm scars cause her to feel shame and embarrassment. Izzy also struggles with nightmares: her unconscious mind’s reaction to trauma. When her childhood nightmare about her father touching her resurfaces, she vomits. Similarly, Clara has nightmares while on laudanum about not being able to help her screaming child, a mirror of when her daughter was taken from her.


These parallels between Izzy and Clara imply that their trauma does not exist in isolation; it spans generations of women. Indeed, the novel shows how trauma can be passed down through mother-daughter relationships. Joyce’s actions haunt Izzy in part because she believes they signify a mental illness that she herself might have inherited: “[S]he was determined not to be like her mother. Becoming mentally ill was her greatest fear” (36). Susan, Clara’s daughter, is similarly concerned about the possibility of mental illness, the irony being that it is not any disease the women have inherited but rather the legacy of the kind of abuse that labels women ill simply for challenging patriarchal authority.


However, the very fact that such trauma is widespread offers a pathway toward healing. Both Izzy and Clara find hope and strength in their bonds with other women. Izzy focuses on reuniting Clara and her daughter as a way of resisting the impulse to self-harm, while Clara is able to carry on into old age because she always believes that she will be reunited with her daughter. When Clara considers suicide, she thinks, “If she gave in to self-pity, she would surely go mad. And she couldn’t let that happen. She had to keep her wits about her if she was going to survive, if she was going to find Beatrice someday” (281). Conversely, Shannon channels her energy not into supporting other women and girls but rather into misogynistic bullying. In doing so, she hurts not only those around her but also herself; for instance, she loses her boyfriend, Ethan. This affirms the novel’s argument that resilience lies in caring for those who have experienced similar trauma—or in working to ensure that they do not experience it in the first place.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence