64 pages • 2-hour read
Riley SagerA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide features discussions and depictions of graphic violence, death, and emotional abuse.
Revenge and justice both play an important role in With a Vengeance. The destruction of Anna’s family is integral to her character arc, as it incites her plan to exact justice upon the people who have hurt her most. It is justice that she claims to want, as when she finally greets the assembled conspirators aboard the Philadelphia Phoenix, she says, “I’m here to get justice. Because I have irrefutable proof that the six of you are responsible for destroying my family” (19). Anna specifically utilizes the term “justice” to describe her intentions, as she plans to bring the group to Chicago to be arrested, tried, and convicted within the United States justice system, even though that same system failed her father.
However, though her aims are noble, Anna is not entirely incapable of slipping into fantasies of revenge. She remembers that when she first saw the evidence illustrating the conspirators’ roles in destroying her family, “her brain filled with violent thoughts. Of strangling them with her bare hands. Of holding them underwater until their eyes bulge and their faces turn blue. Of stabbing them, shooting them, stomping them to pulp” (93). The visceral violence of Anna’s thoughts demonstrates how the desire for revenge is a corrupting force that can bring out people’s more aggressive desires, which deviates from the idealist and fair notions associated with the pursuit of justice. This contrast between what Anna tells herself she seeks (justice) and what she sometimes feels (revenge) underscores the novel’s central tension: whether true justice can ever be disentangled from personal vengeance.
Besides Anna, several other characters wrestle with the idea of revenge. Seamus hunts down the people who killed his brother even though he promised Anna to abide by her plan and seek justice. Reggie also takes revenge into his own hands. During his final faceoff with Anna, he asks her if Seamus told her how it felt to kill for revenge. Anna says that Seamus described it as “beautiful” (445). Though Reggie attempts to goad Anna into joining him and killing Jack and Sal, she tells him, “I’d rather see you in prison along with the others” (445). Anna is so committed to justice that she’d rather turn Reggie in to the authorities than join him in his violent revenge plot, even though Seamus, her close friend, confided in her about the satisfaction revenge could offer. In these moments, Anna distinguishes herself from the men around her, resisting the lure of revenge that consumes both Seamus and Reggie, and proving that her conception of justice, even if imperfect, is ultimately restorative rather than destructive.
Kenneth is another character connected to revenge. He plotted to destroy Arthur and his family because of Margaret and Tommy. When Dante tells Anna about Kenneth and Margaret’s past romantic relationship, Anna realizes, “[The plot] wasn’t about making money. Maybe it was to Lapsford and Herb Pulaski and all the others. But for Dante’s father, it was personal. And what he did wasn’t merely an act of sabotage. It was revenge” (287). Kenneth didn’t only want to obtain Union Atlantic and make a mint; he also wanted to destroy the man who he believed stole his romantic partner. Revenge corrupted Kenneth so completely that he was willing to kill dozens of innocent people to ruin Arthur’s life. The tragic irony is that his revenge plot killed his biological son Tommy, illustrating the detrimental impacts of seeking revenge. Anna, who seeks justice, is rewarded with an offer of working for the FBI and starting a new life, while Kenneth and Reggie are imprisoned for their crimes. Thematically, the novel thus links revenge to loss and self-destruction, while justice, even if fraught, is aligned with survival and renewal.
Truth lies at the heart of With a Vengeance. While Anna’s goal in concocting her plan to bring the conspirators who ruined her family aboard the Philadelphia Phoenix is to bring them to justice, she also seeks to force them to face the truth of their past crimes and the impact of their selfish greed. Anna tries to act with morality in her pursuit of truth, as her ultimate goal is a just punishment for those who harmed her family, but the various moral codes of the characters in Sager’s novel are fluid. For example, Aunt Retta abused Anna throughout her adolescence, slapping her repeatedly, with the intention of teaching her a lesson: “Absorb your pain. Control your hatred. Hone your stillness until it becomes dagger sharp. The people who flail and rage rarely accomplish anything. But those who control their emotions even in the most fraught of situations? They get results” (75). Retta knew that Arthur was innocent, that someone framed him for the heinous act of intentionally creating a faulty locomotive and killing dozens of innocent men. Retta also knew that Anna would be the one to take the truth from the shadowy dossier provided by Dante and bring it to light, clearing the Matheson family name. Retta acted immorally in her callous and cruel treatment of Anna, but her goal was to prepare Anna to find and illuminate the truth, something Retta and Anna both view as morally virtuous. This paradox shows how truth in the novel is not simply a matter of facts but also of what people are willing to endure in order to reveal it.
Dante’s moral code is similarly muddled. He spends much of the narrative pretending he has no idea about his father’s evil plot to destroy Arthur, but in reality, he was the one who sent Retta the evidence proving the truth. When Anna asks Dante why he didn’t tell her about his role in exposing the truth, he says, “I didn’t want you learning that I was helping to prove your father was innocent while I implicated my own” (283). Dante knows that what his father did was wrong and his father deserves to face justice, but he struggles with shaking off the norms of family loyalty. His father is morally corrupt, but he’s still Dante’s father. Yet, Dante feels morally obligated to tell Retta and Anna the truth, to help them clear their own family’s name. His morality is shaped by the truth. Dante’s divided loyalties highlight how the novel refuses to present morality as absolute; instead, it is refracted through relationships and obligations, especially those between parents and children.
Anna knows that the truth could have saved her family from some of its grief. Tommy would still have died in the train explosion, but her parents would have survived. If Kenneth hadn’t paid someone to murder Arthur in prison, Anna knows that “he still would have had the opportunity to lay out his case, prove his innocence, be set free” (461). Kenneth robbed Arthur of his chance to tell the truth through one of the most immoral actions possible: murder. Though Anna’s decision to gather everyone on the train in closed quarters inadvertently leads to the deaths of Judd, Edith, and Herb, the revelation of the truth outweighs the moral pitfalls of her plan. The novel suggests that truth, even when costly or violent in its exposure, carries a redemptive weight that surpasses individual moral failings.
The past haunts the narrative of With a Vengeance. Though the bulk of the plot takes place in 1954, the events of 1942 inform the various characters’ actions and motivations over a decade later. Most of the conspirators wrestle with heavy guilt because of their roles in Kenneth’s evil plot. Judd, for example, struggles with disbelief over his actions, even 12 years later, thinking that “he can’t quite believe he played a key role in something so horrible. Nor can he shake the feeling this train ride is all about paying the price for his past sins” (29). Judd believes that he deserves retribution for his actions because of the heinous outcome, the deaths of dozens of people.
Judd contributed to Kenneth’s plot because of his greed for money but also influence; when Arthur became wealthy and Judd didn’t, Judd envied Arthur’s power and “wondered what it felt like to harness [it]” (28). Judd feels guilt for his envy and his greed, and he doesn’t see an option for redemption. Though his guilt is intense, it does not cloud his ability to see himself clearly. He knows he can no longer lie to himself when he decides to fake his death, as he thinks, “He is a murderer. And he’ll do it again if he has to. If that’s what it takes to escape his fate, he’ll kill every single person on this train” (338). Though Judd is guilty, the guilt cannot outweigh his greed and selfishness, demonstrating his inability to achieve redemption for his past.
Anna struggles with the past, too, though she is not guilty of participating in the nefarious plot. She wrestles with her feelings about the conspirators, to whom she once felt emotionally close. In particular, Anna wrestles with her past love for Edith and Sal, two women who played important roles in her adolescent life. After finding out about their roles in Kenneth’s plot, Anna begins to hate them, but the hate does not supersede the love, as Anna realizes that “she both loved and hated Edith, the emotions feeding off each other until she couldn’t tell them apart…The hate, she was prepared for. It was the slivers of love that were a surprise” (263). Anna thought that any past love she once felt dissipated in her feelings of betrayal, but she realizes that she still feels traces of love. Anna does not get closure in her relationship with Edith, other than Edith’s promise that her love for Anna and Tommy was genuine, before Judd kills Edith. She does, however, get some closure with Sal, who helps her catch Seamus and Reggie before they kill more people. At the end of the novel, Sal nods at Anna, who notes that “it’s not an apology, and it’s certainly not forgiveness. But it’s close” (470). Sal admits her guilt to Anna and helps her prevent further violence, and though she doesn’t fully achieve redemption for her past actions, she comes close. Through Anna’s unresolved feelings of love and betrayal, the novel shows how the past exerts a relentless weight, but also how small gestures of responsibility or honesty can gesture toward redemption, even if forgiveness remains out of reach.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.