55 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of physical and emotional abuse.
Petra is the novel’s protagonist and point-of-view character. She is a 34-year-old successful author navigating both professional scrutiny and personal dissatisfaction. Married to Shephard, with two young children, Petra appears outwardly steady, grounded in domestic routine and public acclaim for her writing. She is known for a popular book series that has earned her fame and wealth but also intense fan scrutiny and criticism that she struggles to manage, illustrating The Negative Effects of Popularity and Fame. Her decision to retreat to a cabin to work on her latest book is the novel’s inciting incident, as she hopes the solitude and peace will allow her to complete her first novel in over a year and earn back respect from her fans. As the point-of-view character, Petra’s perceptions shape the narrative, filtering events through her anxieties, desires, and rationalizations in alignment with the conventions of the psychological thriller genre. As Petra becomes embroiled in living out the experiences of her own main characters through her relationship with Saint, this limited perspective illustrates how she interprets and often distorts reality to preserve her sense of control and artistic identity, highlighting The Ties Between Ambition and Moral Erosion.
At the start of the novel, Petra is defined by the tension between security and dissatisfaction. Her marriage to Shephard represents comfort and predictability, while her creative life seems increasingly constrained by public opinion and self-doubt. This dissatisfaction motivates her retreat to the cabin, where she seeks solitude and artistic renewal, as well as emotional escape. Petra repeatedly frames her choices as necessary for her work, suggesting that she views creativity as justification for her decisions. This mindset lays the groundwork for her vulnerability to Saint: She is not naĂŻve, but she is willing to suspend skepticism if it promises inspiration and productivity in her writing, further emphasizing the theme of the ties between ambition and moral erosion. Her early interactions with Saint reveal a pattern of selective attention, as she ignores inconsistencies in his story and her limited knowledge of him, accepting his intrusions as long as they produce productive bursts in her writing.
As Petra grows closer to Saint, her moral boundaries begin to erode. She repeatedly insists on lines that must not be crossed: She tells the reader she would never have an affair, claims she is only getting close to Saint as “research” for her writing, and is adamant that she will return to her comfortable life with Shephard. However, she allows Saint to approach each boundary incrementally, reframing his actions as part of their “game” or artistic experience while simultaneously being disturbed by his behavior. While Saint is largely responsible for these rationalizations, Petra actively participates in them, distancing herself from the real implications of her choices. Her attraction to Saint is inseparable from her attraction to being seen and understood as an artist rather than a wife or public figure. Slowly, her devolution into allowing Saint to manipulate her life develops the theme of The Blurred Line Between Fantasy and Reality. Petra’s vulnerability stems largely from ambition, as she wants her work to matter deeply, even at her own personal risk. The potential destruction of her life becomes entwined with her desire to live out the experiences of her main character, eventually causing Petra to lose the distinction between the two.
Petra is a dynamic character who changes throughout the course of the text with regard to her career, but her relationship to Saint—and, by extension, writing—remains stagnant. At the start of the novel, Petra goes to the cabin seeking refuge. She has hidden herself from the public eye for over a year, then physically removes herself to isolation in an attempt to write without the criticism of the literary world. However, she learns that this is not the solution to her problem. When she tells her fans during the Q&A that she accepts responsibility for the film and that she is not “infallible,” the novel illustrates how she has changed. She recognizes that negative criticism comes with her popularity and fame, and the solution is acknowledgment and acceptance, rather than seclusion and escape.
Despite this fact, her continued obsession with Saint as she searches online for his review and thinks of her months after leaving the cabin implies that she will likely return, desiring success with her next novel while wanting to be with Saint again to break up the mundanity of her life. Petra accepts responsibility for her choices intellectually, admitting that she is the one who took things too far, yet she emotionally remains entangled. The final email and cabin reservation underscore this unresolved state, as she has learned but not necessarily changed. She never achieves redemption as she never confronts or apologizes for her transgressions; instead, she seems poised to again rely on Saint to achieve success and avoid harsh criticisms from her fans.
Saint is the novel’s primary antagonist, using manipulation, deception, and psychological intrusion to control Petra’s time at the cabin. Introduced as a mysterious law enforcement officer, Saint initially appears as a stabilizing presence—he is calm, protective, and unusually invested in Petra’s wellbeing. As the story unfolds, however, it becomes clear that this persona is a deliberate construction. The revelation of his true identity as Eric Kingston, a screenwriter from Los Angeles, reframes his earlier actions as calculated performances designed to gain Petra’s trust. Unlike Petra, whose perspective limits the narrative, Saint operates with full awareness of the fiction he is creating, positioning him in direct opposition to Petra’s autonomy.
Saint’s antagonism stems from his desire to control the narrative rather than dominate Petra physically. He repeatedly insists that he is helping Petra, protecting her from threats, inspiring her writing, and offering her insight into her characters. However, these justifications mask a pattern of violating Petra’s boundaries and her domestic life. Saint is a physical manifestation of the theme of the blurred line between fantasy and reality, as he collapses the distinction between Petra’s art, her lived experience, and the connection between that art and those who consume it. At the same time, he manipulates Petra, insisting that his actions are tied only to his desire to allow her to succeed. While he encourages her to erode her personal boundaries, he insists that the cost is worth it, as it allows her to beat her writer’s block and write her first novel in over a year.
Ultimately, Saint remains static—he demonstrates little growth in the traditional sense. He does not apologize meaningfully, nor does he acknowledge the harm that he causes, beyond vague assurances that he never intended to hurt her. His presence at the book signing is an ominous reminder of the duality of his character: He destroyed Petra’s moral boundaries yet successfully helped her write her next bestseller. He understands Petra’s desire for success and her attraction to him, and his invitation to visit the cabin again establishes his belief that his actions were justified by the results.
Mari is a secondary character whose actions enable the novel’s central conflict. Introduced as the friendly, eccentric owner of the lakeside cabin, Mari initially appears harmless. Petra views her as an artist-adjacent local who is a welcome distraction from her work. Mari takes a casual approach to life while minimizing Petra’s fears about her artistic struggles. However, as the truth about Saint emerges, Mari becomes an active accomplice to Saint, emphasizing how the harm to Petra is facilitated through rationalization rather than overt malice.
Saint’s staged crime scene and subsequent deception of Petra are central to Mari’s character development and her role in the narrative. When confronted, she frames her involvement simply as an acting job, justifying her choices by emphasizing her own artistic identity and financial compensation. This explanation ties Mari directly to the theme of the blurred line between performance and reality. Like Petra and Saint, Mari treats lived experience as material, but unlike Petra, she does so without emotional investment or accountability. Her willingness to accept Saint’s story without verifying Petra’s consent highlights a moral disengagement that allows the exploitation of Petra to occur under the guise of creativity. When the truth is revealed, Petra views Mari’s betrayal as particularly violating because it confirms that multiple people participated in her manipulation, even the seemingly easy-going friend she gained at the cabin.
Ultimately, Mari embodies the danger of disengaged creativity, serving as a cautionary tale for the road that Petra follows throughout the novel. Her career in fictionalizing others’ trauma is a metaphorical embodiment of her actions at the cabin, insisting that she is “just an innocent bystander” and justifying her actions with Petra’s successful writing (247), just as Saint does.
Nora is Petra’s best friend and one of the few people in the literary world who stuck by her after the backlash from her film adaptation. She is a writer herself, serving as a source of support for Petra’s work and a sounding board for her ideas. Nora is a static character who initially represents safety and grounding, encouraging Petra to work through her writer’s block and her issues with the public. She occupies a privileged position in Petra’s life, one that makes her eventual involvement with Saint especially devastating. She encourages Saint to go to the cabin posing as a police officer to “inspire” Petra, serving as an accomplice—even if indirectly—to their subsequent affair.
Like Mari, Nora frames her choice as benign and even helpful, rooted in creative encouragement. However, Petra’s response makes it clear that good intentions do not negate consequences, insisting that Nora’s involvement makes her complicit in the violation of Petra’s autonomy and safety. Nora ultimately underscores the ties between ambition and moral erosion: She treats Petra’s life as material rather than reality, manipulating her to get her to write while, at the novel’s end, insisting that she does not even want to know the specifics of what unfolded between her and Saint. The tension between her involvement and her insistence on distance makes both her motivations and the foundations of her relationship with Petra suspect.



Unlock analysis of every major character
Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.