54 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes descriptions of pregnancy loss, elder abuse, and emotional abuse.
In the weeks that follow her lunch with Xavier, the narrator pays close attention to Tomas’s feelings. One morning, Tomas offers to walk the narrator to work, but before they have walked very far, he decides to return home and work on his writing. The narrator tries to convince him to accompany her longer, but Tomas insists on turning back. After he leaves, the narrator sees Xavier nearby. Xavier recognizes Tomas from the restaurant and deduces that he is the narrator’s husband.
Xavier informs the narrator that Anne has offered him a job as her assistant, replacing Lou. (He explains that this is what he wanted to tell the narrator at lunch before she abruptly left.) He claims to want to make sure that the narrator is comfortable with the idea that he will be working for Anne. Although the narrator wants to be alone to process the information, she agrees to walk with Xavier to the theater. At a café, Xavier holds the door open for her, a courtesy that she recognizes as part of another role that he is playing—that of the dutiful assistant.
The narrator mentions the interview that Xavier referenced at lunch, explaining that the journalist misrepresented her abortion. Xavier accepts this explanation for why he cannot be the narrator’s son, then asks if she ever wanted to have any children with Tomas. The narrator admits that she isn’t sure anymore.
Privately, however, she recalls that she later became pregnant with Tomas’s baby and experienced a miscarriage during her 11th week. Even now, the pregnancy and miscarriage are difficult for the narrator to process. On the other hand, she remembers that although Tomas was excited about the prospect of fatherhood, he hid his feelings out of respect for her ambivalence. He downloaded an app that would show him how big the embryo was growing each day, and the narrator spotted this app when Tomas left his phone open one day, coming face-to-face with a side of Tomas that she hadn’t known before.
After the miscarriage, the narrator began engaging in extramarital affairs— not because she was dissatisfied with her marriage, but because she felt restless. Tomas never admitted to any knowledge of her affairs. To compensate for her transgressions, the narrator looked for ways to make it up to Tomas, such as preparing breakfast for the both of them. Tomas would receive her gestures with pleasant surprise, which made the narrator feel guilty that she hadn’t been kind to him in so long. After the first breakfast, Tomas asked her to do it again, and she agreed until the practice became a daily ritual. This development signaled her temporary recommitment to her marriage—at least until the next affair began.
The narrator does not tell Xavier anything about her second pregnancy. As they continue walking to the theater, the narrator describes her acting process, explaining that she sometimes becomes so entranced by ideas that she loses sight of where these ideas are supposed to end. She explains that it is necessary for her to “lose sight of the shore” (66) in order to fully immerse herself in a role. The ideas associated with the role take over her life, making it necessary for her to reach the other side of the idea in order to survive.
Occasionally, the narrator feels as though there is a gap between the richness of her life and the clichéd, stereotyped roles that she is offered. This disconnect comes partly because of her identity as a woman of color, which once prompted her agent to suggest that she change her name into something more distinctive to Western audiences. Although the narrator disagreed with the suggestion, she spent several years wondering whether her roles were three-dimensional enough to require her full commitment to embodying them. Her work on Parts of Speech stood out from all her other roles because it was the first part that “allowed [her] to be human” (68). Some aspects of the character persisted in her behavior long after the end of the production, prompting her to recognize the importance of managing the border between her characters and her real self.
Xavier wonders if the narrator has immersed herself in her current role, implying the possibility that she hasn’t. His words make the narrator feel vulnerable, given Xavier’s partnership with Anne. Privately, the narrator is worried that she hasn’t properly inhabited the role yet. She was driven to seek the role because she had been eager to work with the playwright, an emerging talent in the theater scene. When the playwright reached out to her with the role, the narrator quickly accepted it, believing in its potential to be her best role yet. However, her confidence shifted during the first table read, in which it became evident that she couldn’t quite find her way into the role.
The narrator deflects Xavier’s question, leading him to share Anne’s high praise for her. The narrator admits that she is running out of time to improve her performance. Xavier wonders if the narrator might actually be good despite what she thinks of her own performance. The narrator is privately unsure of what she really believes.
She thinks back to an actor with whom she worked on a recent project. The actor had appeared in a film called Salvation, in which he had delivered an extraordinary performance. The narrator became excited to work with him on his next project but was surprised to learn that the actor was extremely unprofessional. The director later conferred with her and told her that on the set of Salvation, the actor’s terrible behavior inadvertently strengthened his performance because his inability to learn his lines made him appear genuinely confused and afraid of the world around him, which was appropriate for the role he was playing. This insinuates that the actor was actually experiencing dementia and reveals that this revelation forever changed the way she viewed the actor’s performance in Salvation. She could suddenly envision the actor’s death as the endpoint of his life. At the same time, the narrator realizes how intensely the quality of the actor’s performance depends on her interpretation. In her view, the film captured the actor’s surrender to the inevitability of death.
The narrator asserts that artifice is what makes a performance enjoyable, citing the fact that she can no longer watch Salvation without recognizing the reality of the actor’s dementia. She insists that performers must be satisfied with their performances, which validates their agency.
Xavier disagrees with the narrator’s last point, insisting that her performance is good whether she likes it or not. They arrive at the theater, grabbing everyone’s attention. Anne calls them a “perfect mother and son” (80), and the narrator realizes that Anne is projecting the archetype of the ideal son onto Xavier. Their affectionate dynamic makes the narrator envious.
Anne communicates her optimistic feelings about the production. The playwright, Max, has also signaled her approval of the endeavor. The scene that Anne wants to work on that day occurs in the middle of Max’s script and features the narrator alone onstage. The narrator is pleased because this is the one part of the play that she does not yet fully understand.
Max talks to the narrator about the scene, indicating that it is unlike anything she has ever written before because it is more conceptual than emotional. However, as the narrator listens to Max, she realizes that Max is bored of the narrator’s character. Max describes the scene as the moment in which the narrator’s character achieves an emotional breakthrough, which she ties to the title of the play, The Opposite Shore. This idea clashes with the narrator’s own conception of the character. Soon after this conversation, the narrator realizes that Max has written the scene as a filler, bridging two versions of the character together after growing bored with the first version. This evidence of disjointed writing frustrates the narrator, who now has no idea how to resolve the fundamental issues of the scene.
Xavier checks in on the narrator, who drily asks him for advice. Xavier tells her a joke that he learned from his father, whose friend had fallen out of love with his wife and could no longer find joy in his family. The friend consulted a therapist, who advised him to pretend that he was in love with his wife. The friend kept doing this until he actually fell in love with her again. The narrator does not understand the punchline, so Xavier explains that the joke does not actually refer to a friend, but to Xavier’s father himself. The narrator is disturbed by Xavier’s sense of humor.
Anne tells the narrator that she is pleased with Xavier’s presence as part of the production. (Xavier is classmates with Hana, the daughter of two of Anne’s friends.) Anne praises Xavier for being attentive to her needs rather than reactive. Knowing how exacting Anne can be, the narrator does not believe that Xavier will survive as her assistant. Nevertheless, she also considers the possibility that Xavier could work well with Anne and with Max, to discuss how to improve the narrator’s performance.
The narrator begins to tell Anne what Xavier told her during their first meeting. Before she can reveal this information, the narrator gets a text from Tomas, asking her if they can talk. He is worried that he has avoided the issues in their relationship for too long. Alarmed, the narrator doesn’t say anything more to Anne about what Xavier told her. She urgently needs to call Tomas, but Anne denies her the opportunity, indicating that rehearsals must start immediately.
The first part of the novel provides additional details about the narrator’s backstory, recontextualizing the terms of her relationship with Tomas and clarifying her intensely immersive approach to acting, which bleeds into the dynamics of her everyday life and interactions. The most crucial passages of exposition can be found in the narrator’s descriptions of her past infidelity, which arose in the aftermath of her failed pregnancy with Tomas. In addition to creating a darker twist on The Uncanny Dynamics of Family Life, the pregnancy and subsequent miscarriage underscore the emotional gulf that persists between the narrator and Tomas, for neither character has fully articulated or dealt with their emotions in the wake of these life-changing events. Although Tomas never explicitly pressured the narrator to have a child, her recollections of that earlier time reveal his genuine enthusiasm over the idea of fatherhood. Upon realizing the extent of his eagerness to become a father, the narrator perceived just how different she and Tomas really were as people, and this new understanding drastically impacted her behavior, contributing to the unsettled emotions that fueled her infidelity. To her, Tomas became unrecognizable in his enthusiasm for a future that she was not sure whether she wanted. Now, he suddenly feels like a stranger, and so does she. Thus, her explanations of her past infidelity reveal that she did not necessarily feel the need to pursue a certain person; instead, she specifies that the affairs were “an expression of restlessness rather than discontent” (62).
The narrator’s restlessness resonates with the curious behavior that governed her actions before her marriage to Tomas. That same youthful curiosity compels her to meet with Xavier a second time, kicking off the events of the novel. This pattern suggests that the narrator’s impulsiveness is a character flaw that precipitates conflict and drives tension in her interactions. At the start of Chapter 5, for example, the narrator tells Xavier that she sometimes needs to immerse herself in the fictional reality of a role in order to make her performance work. However, this embrace of method acting in her professional sphere also bleeds through into her daily life and affects her interactions with both Tomas and Xavier. In order to understand what Xavier really wants from her, she feels the need to indulge her curiosity and learn more about him. At the same time, however, her impulsiveness in this matter threatens the already fragile stability of her life with Tomas. She knows full well that Xavier objectively cannot be her son, but she continues to engage with him even after Tomas has signaled his suspicion that the narrator must be having an affair with Xavier. Despite the narrator’s best efforts to prevent these two men from meeting one another, she has no control over their ability to perceive one another and make judgments based on what they see. In this way, the narrator’s highly problematic approach to The Challenge of Performing the Self leads her to develop false selves that deeply complicate her life.
Due to this mix of internal impulses and external factors, the narrator can no longer avoid engaging with Xavier, especially when he deliberately entangles himself in her work life. In this moment, Xavier’s encroachment threatens to upend her life in a new way. Now that the narrator has rejected Xavier’s attempt to impose a maternal role upon her, he engineers opportunities for Anne to fill this role for him instead, causing the narrator to react with envy and hostility. However, because of the benefit that this job opportunity represents for Xavier’s own career aspirations, the narrator cannot openly accuse him of attempting to usurp even more control over her life, and without confronting him directly, there is no way for her to know if his intention is to dominate her.
Notably, Xavier’s presence upends her preconceived notions of stability during the first rehearsal that they attend together, and by the end of Part 1, the narrator finds that her social realities are becoming increasingly unstable. Her admiration for Max is dulled by the insight that the fledgling playwright does not really know what to do with the narrator’s character, and this fundamental uncertainty—exacerbated by Xavier’s destabilizing presence—is foreshadowed to have an adverse effect on the narrator’s onstage performance. Later, when Tomas initiates a confrontation, the narrator cannot immediately address this issue because her work demands all of her attention, and she has no room to bargain with Anne for personal space. Ironically, her best chance of influencing Anne is to engage in a closer relationship with Xavier. With these new complications, the narrator must reckon with the consequences of the rash choices that she made earlier in the novel.
It is no coincidence that Kitamura applies the same language to the narrator’s acting methods and to the play in which the narrator is performing. Both situations are framed by the water-based metaphors of “immersion” and of reaching the “opposite shore” of the performance journey. For the narrator to achieve her emotional breakthrough in the play, she must immerse herself deeply in the reality of her role, willingly losing sight of the “shore”—the grounding bedrock of her real life. Notably, Xavier’s mindset mirrors her own, a fact that becomes clear when he relates an anecdote about his father that also resonates with the idea of immersion. (To overcome issues in his family life, Xavier’s father followed his therapist’s advice to immerse himself in the role of loving his wife, until the performance became the reality). This portrayal of the transformative effects of immersion foreshadows the shifts in the narrator’s relationship with the people around her in Part 2.



Unlock all 54 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.