49 pages 1-hour read

Carrie

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1974

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Persistence of Traumatic Memory

The epistolary sections of the novel imply a trustable and representable reality. Books, magazine articles, press releases, and interview transcripts all imply fact and objective reportage, and they bolster and contextualize the increasingly extraordinary events relayed in the linear narration of 1979. However, King never includes the entirety of any of these documentary sources and in doing so creates not an unimpeachable record of past events, but a representation of the fractured memories associated with trauma. Much of the novel is about trying to piece together the unexplainable, and the epistolary excerpts create an atmosphere that forces the reader to question the cohesiveness of memory. This relates to the larger question that informs the structure of Carrie: how to properly assess memories of trauma.


When Carrie first uses her telekinesis intentionally, she experiences a mental release, and remembers the day she caused the stones to rain—the first major indication of her ability. As Carrie develops confidence in her telekinetic ability, it alleviates other pressures on her mind. When she counters her intimidation in the dress store with the comforting thought that she can collapse ceilings, she accesses more direct memories of the day she rained stones on her home: “[S]eemingly unbidden—like the knowledge of menstruation—a score of memories had come, as if some mental dam had been knocked down so that the strange waters could gush forth” (114).


Carrie therefore experiences her recollections as gifts and as something conjoined with her newfound control of her telekinesis: Both are things Carrie has learned to suppress. However, her traumatized memories of the power that she could not understand become clearer as she grows more comfortable with her body and its abilities. She recalls her mother attempting to kill her after her interaction with the neighbor’s daughter and remembers flexing her telekinetic power to bring the stones upon her home. With the onslaught of memory, Carrie gains confidence in the fact that she has been practicing her ability all her life, and she also gains a deeper insight into her mother’s fear. This allows Carrie to seize power in the relationship and take charge of a fundamental self she has kept buried in the haze of fearful memory.


Margaret White is also traumatized and shelters herself from her memories with biblical rhetoric. After the event with the stones, Margaret wouldn’t address her wounds or the destruction of the house, and “little by little it was forgotten” (116). However, despite Margaret’s willful amnesia, her relationship to Carrie is forever altered, and she must confront her memories after Carrie’s ability reemerges. Once again, Margaret resorts to her biblical invectives in an attempt to control the situation, but these prove increasingly useless. When Carrie tells her about Tommy’s prom invitation, Margaret reverts to her traditional trauma-processing attitudes, but her traumatic memories are too potent, and she yells at Carrie about the lust of men before uttering, “He. Took. Me.” (119)—a reference to the marital rape she experienced. Margaret quickly veers away from this subject, but she cannot keep her memory contained for long. After Carrie’s rampage confirms Margaret’s worst suspicions about her daughter, Margaret reveals her most hidden secret: She enjoyed the rape. However, she has never been able to accept this memory and faces her trauma only when she is sure of her own death, avoiding coming to terms with it once and for all.


The final excerpt from Sue’s autobiography indicates that she is still haunted by her final experience with Carrie. She earlier mentions being at peace with the destruction and Tommy’s death, but she cannot move past the connection she shared with Carrie. She emphasizes that Carrie was not a monster but falls short of valorizing Carrie or rationalizing her reaction. Sue thinks only of “that long tunnel into blackness” Carrie’s brain death revealed to her and states that she still needs time to think things over (303). Several of the epistolary sections referring to the witnesses’ experiences demonstrate this same sticking of traumatic memory. These witnesses seem trapped in the incidents they are describing. This evokes the recurrence of traumatic memory and the difficulty of coming to terms with an experience that reveals a formerly trusted world to be hostile; it also suggests the harmful, repetitious cycles of remembering that prevent trauma survivors from moving forward. Coupled with the fractured nature of the epistolary sections in the book, Carrie is very much a novel informed by the persistence of trauma in human memory.

Coming-of-age, Menstruation as Liberation

Carrie’s menstruation initiates every event which follows it. This gives it central importance in the novel, in which the transformative rites of puberty and high school graduation are the organizing elements for King’s Gothic depiction of coming-of-age. The novel hits the narrative beats of a typical coming-of-age story—first experiences of sexual activity, increased distance from parents, and the end of high school—yet skews both the events themselves and their consequences in order to focus on the gathering and dispersal of female agency.


Carrie, Sue, and Chris each experience their significant coming-of-age moments after Carrie’s first menstruation and the locker-room assault. For Sue, it is the breach of a world she had forever accepted. She begins inside the popular clique, swept along by groupthink after Chris initiates the bullying. Acting under a “charm,” Sue only recognizes her complicity in the event later, when she is in the midst of another conventional high school activity: sneaking off with her boyfriend for intimacy in the back of a car. Tommy asks Sue to accompany him to the dance, completing their outward portrait as a typical “handsome couple” (56). However, Sue’s realization that the future she pictured was nothing more than conformity upends the idyllic image of high school romance. Sickened by her part in the locker-room assault, Sue refuses to obey the typical expectations of a popular teenage girl and begins to define herself as an individual.


In a parallel scene, Chris also takes stock of her expected life, realizing she is on the cusp of a choice that will define her future. After examining the life she has gotten away with—wriggling out of trouble by allowing her lovers to take the blame for her indiscretions or utilizing her father’s legal presence to avoid punishment—Chris is yet again about to initiate an act for which she believes she will not face any consequences. Before she and Billy leave for the prom, she suggests that “Maybe it’s a bad idea” (164), but she allows Billy to convince her to move forward. Chris’s earlier lament that this would be “the last year the dance would be so formal or traditional” hints at her reasons for going forward with the attack (135). Chris’s coming-of-age is squarely rooted in conservative values that uphold the status-quo, which is not surprising for someone who is on top of a current power structure. The revelation she experiences at the end of the novel—that she is not in control of Billy or her future—stalls her in the perpetual treading of her teenage years. She dies before her life can change.


Menstruation is typically viewed as the beginning of puberty, and in Carrie’s case this is certainly true. That it occurs so late (and so publicly) emphasizes Carrie’s otherness but does not negate its usual symbolism. Carrie’s mother’s reaction underscores this: In an inversion of coming-of-age stories in which a young girl’s mother is proud to welcome her to womanhood, Margaret uses the fact that Carrie is now a woman to stress her inherent sinfulness, immediately asking Carrie to “pray to Jesus for our woman-weak, wicked, sinning souls” (66). Margaret’s belief that all women are tainted by Eve’s original sin strips the moment of its positive connotations and further imprisons Carrie in a body that she does not understand and cannot control.


Likewise, Carrie’s menstrual blood’s connection to her telekinetic ability also imprisons her in a lockstep toward her inevitable, destructive end. Carrie is imprisoned in her mother’s belief structure, trained to think of herself as fallen and irredeemable and unable to change the fact of her menstruation, yet the pairing of her first period with an increased awareness of her telekinesis also offers Carrie a path toward liberation—a vital step in the coming-of-age process. Early on, Carrie thinks, “like the memory of the stones, the knowledge of menstruation seemed always to have been there, blocked but waiting” (49). As she sorts through her memories of the event, Carrie comes to realize that the power dynamic under which she was raised is no longer applicable. Carrie’s extraordinary power enables her to shift the power dynamic immediately, and in the course of a night she liberates herself from her mother’s influence and realizes an identity that no longer keeps her beholden to her childhood home. While this is usually a defining moment of coming-of-age, however, Carrie moves from dark into further darkness. The slaughter Carrie enacts does not bring enlightenment, and Carrie finds she is unable to exist in the world on her own; as she is dying, she resembles a child seeking the comfort of her mother, thinking, “i want her o it hurts my chest hurts my shoulder o o o i want my momma” (289).


The final human sensation in the linear narrative is “the slow course of dark menstrual blood down” Sue’s thighs (291). The implied miscarriage Sue experiences brings closure to Carrie’s story with a different sense of liberation than Carrie’s menstruation offered. Sue’s coming-of-age is complicated by her awareness that she will not conform to the social expectations for her future. Much of Sue’s narrative consists of her attempts to navigate her new freedom, unsure how to act and certain only of what she does not want to become. She earlier imagined a conventional future as Tommy’s wife and the mother of his children, but her menstruation is a reclamation of her body and future; Sue is liberated from her past and is now free to face her adult life.

The Shaping of Rage

Carrie’s storyline presents a case study of a victim of bullying finding their only source of power in retributive violence. The incessant bullying Carrie faces isolates her from her peers, deepening the alienation her abusive and fundamentalist upbringing has caused. In her mother’s Christianity, there is little notion of compassion or redemption—only punishment for transgression—priming Carrie to lash out violently when her telekinesis makes such retribution possible.


After Carrie’s attack in the locker-room showers, her thoughts immediately intertwine vengeance, apocalyptic imagery, and a willingness to use her power against offenders. Carrie’s thoughts grow increasingly violent before flowering into the idealized figure that haunts Carrie’s home life “(savior jesus meek and mild)” (27). The next time Carrie’s thoughts appear in the text, they combine selections from two biblical verses—Revelation 8:11 and 9:5—that directly point to divine retribution. These two references to Christian theology illustrate Carrie’s emotional state as it oscillates between the placidity of the Christ-figure and the cataclysmic moralism of Christian mythology. When first encountered in the text, Carrie is virtually mute and seemingly numb to the world around her. Once she is alone, however, the extent of her rage becomes clear. She envisions “Chris Hargensen all bloody and screaming for mercy” and imagines crushing her head with a rock (27). This segues into imagery from Revelation, which depicts the retributive violence of God and the mass death and destruction preceding the coming of God’s kingdom: “Momma [said] there would be a Day of Judgement […] and an angel with a sword” (27).


Carrie herself longs to be “His sword and His arm” (27), foreshadowing the final identity Carrie takes on after her slaughter of the school and the town: the avenging angel. It is no surprise, then, that immediately after conceptualizing herself this way, Carrie weaponizes her telekinesis against her neighbors. Another vital shift in Carrie’s psychology occurs while she is buying the velvet for her prom dress. Intimidated by her surroundings, she draws on the biblical image of Samson pulling down the roof of the temple on the heads of his oppressors to reassure herself. This foreshadows the end of the novel and is the continuation of Carrie’s earlier instinct: to suppress her fear with images of biblical desolation and draw deep comfort from the potential destructiveness of her telekinetic ability. Fear is also the primary dynamic between Margaret and Carrie. Margaret regularly uses religious terror to maintain her power over Carrie, but this dynamic shifts as Carrie spots fear in her mother’s eyes. Even when Margaret resorts to her physically imposing presence in the face of Carrie’s rebellious questioning, Carrie threatens to bring back the stones, and there is a tangible shift in power.


The secondary force shaping Carrie’s rage is the bullying she receives at school. While this contributes quite a lot toward Carrie’s ultimate motivation in unleashing her power, it does little to shape her concept of vengeance other than providing it with a concrete target. The most influential aspect of the bullying is the isolation it imposes upon Carrie. She is unable to alleviate the weight of the abuse she receives at home through connection at school, and she is suspicious of all around her. In the entire novel, Carrie only initiates one conversation, when she tells Tommy her curfew after the dance. Of all her classmates, Tommy is the one to whom she grows closest, coming to trust him at the prom. For a few moments, she is even his equal as prom royalty, but his quick death strands her again in a room full of people who only laugh at her.


Margaret has raised Carrie to view the rest of Chamberlain as irredeemable, and this enables Carrie to turn her destructive powers on the town. Even though she decides that “God had turned His face away” from her actions (249), Carrie still resorts to biblical ideas to support her violence. After characterizing a street of people as “Animals” (249)—an inversion of the dehumanization that facilitated Carrie’s own victimization—Carrie imagines her killing of them as a sacrifice, listing in her mind “racca, Ichabod, wormwood” (249): biblical names that point to destruction as moral punishment. Even after Carrie has killed her mother, the strength of her mother’s legacy endures. Carrie assumes a final mantle in the novel, “the Angel with the Sword” (264), that echoes the Book of Revelation and Christ’s separation of the sinners from the saints at the end of days.

The Othering of Carrie White

In order to situate Carrie as an outsider, the text utilizes a strategy of comparisons that reduce her agency and rule out her chances of ever gaining acceptance. The text constantly compares her to animals—particularly to cows. Carrie’s first “speech” is “a strangely froggy sound, grotesquely apt” (6), and after the other girls notice her menstruation, the text depicts her as “a patient ox” staring “bovinely” (8). Even Miss Desjardin, who halts the assault, thinks Carrie resembles an “ape.”


This textual devaluation of Carrie reflects Carrie’s separation from the rest of the people in the work. The belief that Carrie isn’t fully human “allows” others to view their bullying of Carrie as righteous and normal. Billy Nolan’s refrain, “Pig blood for a pig” (132), and Sue Snell’s mental “charm” (10) in the locker room are self-confirming arguments repeated over and over until they become ingrained knowledge, allowing the characters to separate themselves from Carrie and any emotion she might feel. In Billy’s case the dehumanization goes particularly deep, linking Carrie to the pigs on Henty’s farm that he has no qualms about maliciously killing.


Those who don’t compare Carrie to an animal still other her by regarding her as more of an object than an autonomous person. Tommy’s comparison of Carrie to Galatea casts doubt on Carrie’s agency on prom night. Tommy’s intention is to suggest that Carrie has turned “from a drudge into a beautiful woman” (166), yet his choice of Galatea—a statue embodying the misogynistic sculptor’s idea of perfect femininity—indicates that Carrie is a constructed object, molded by her mother’s religious zealotry, Sue’s attempts at atonement, and finally Chris’s machinations. In all of this, Carrie is more object than human. Only in her decision to return to the prom and unleash her powers does Carrie exercise her agency.


Carrie’s symbolic baptism in blood reverses the dynamic of othering. Norma Watson, a surviving witness, describes the crowd’s reaction to seeing Carrie at the prom as like “watching a person rejoin the human race” (209). For the first time, the text allows Carrie a part in the humanity around her. However, this equality disappears as Carrie returns to the gym to attack her tormentors. When Carrie locks all the doors to the gymnasium, panic overtakes the crowd and they rush the doors, leading Watson to depict her peers as “screaming and burrowing like cattle” (212). Carrie, whom the novel has repeatedly described as bovine, has achieved recognition of her humanity while dehumanizing her classmates. As Carrie observes the scene from the other side of the door, she also reduces the students to animals, imagining that they look “like fish in an aquarium” (232). Later, when she stands amidst a street full of Chamberlin’s citizens, she labels them with only one word: “Animals” (249). Immediately afterward, she slaughters them mercilessly.


The dichotomy reverts at the end of the novel. When Sue comes across Carrie’s dying form, she is “reminded of dead animals […] that had been crushed by speeding trucks and station wagons” (285). The comparison to roadkill implies a degree of pity, but pity at arm’s length. It also suggests someone unable to live in the world that humans have constructed, just as an animal cannot understand or coexist with technology like cars. Carrie will remain forever isolated from those around her, and this is the enduring horror of her situation. Carrie has lived her life wholly alone, made inhuman by those around her, and Sue Snell’s autobiography confirms that this continues after her death, lamenting,


They’ve made her into some kind of a symbol and forgotten that she was a human being […]. Nothing can change her back now from something made out of newsprint into a person. But she was, and she hurt. More than any of us probably know, she hurt (165).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence