57 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Capitalism, the generation and accumulation of material wealth, is usually considered the primary means to achieve the American Dream of personal success and fulfillment. As Desmond discusses throughout the book, this is not necessarily the case. While life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness may entail making as much money as possible, it doesn’t mean doing so at the expense of other people’s lives. In fact, he believes safe and affordable housing is more of a right embodying the American Dream than enabling a single-minded devotion to increasing monthly cash flow by landlords such as Sherrena Tarver.
While Tobin Charney is a typical landlord—uninterested in anything other than making as much money as possible—Tarver is a peculiar creation existing as a perverted outgrowth of the American Dream. That is, people are told they can be anything they want if they work hard enough. Tarver has taken this to such an extreme, however, she has turned into an unfeeling monster or at least unfeeling about anything other than believing she is put upon by her tenants and wanting as many vacation getaways and fancy baubles as she can afford.
In contrast to this, Desmond presents a different idea of the American Dream: the collective work done by neighbors to create a community for everyone to live in safely and productively. After all, the United States was not created as a group of individuals but as people in a group working toward the same agreed-upon common good. He supports this position by detailing the historical precedents of tenants working together to uphold their rights and improve their lives. In his eyes, while Tarver is not a modern creation, it’s the lack of solidarity by the poor in response to landlords like her that ultimately undermines their ability to achieve anything other than a grinding, miserable existence.
People are told the virtuous are rewarded, the wicked punished. The question is, however, what defines people as being either good or bad? As an outgrowth of the influence of capitalism, a common belief is those with money are good or are at least better than the poor, whose poverty and helplessness are clear indicators of their unworthiness and need to be punished.
It’s not just people with money like Tarver who believe this. After all, as Desmond points out in Chapter 14, nobody thinks the poor are more undeserving than the poor themselves. While Crystal Mayberry doesn’t want any woman to be beaten, she still thinks her neighbor, Trisha, likes it on some level to put up with it. Or, as Arleen Belle tells her son, when they find themselves in yet another miserable temporary-housing situation, this is what happens to people without a home.
As the book shows, however, money is no indicator of virtue. Tarver is gleefully cold-blooded in taking as much money as possible from everyone around her. Charney is concerned with making as much money from his trailer park as he can before being forced to sell it. Larraine Warren’s sister uses her relatively more stable economic situation to sabotage Larraine when she desperately needs help.
So where is the virtue and who are the virtuous in Evicted? Maybe this is the wrong question. Maybe this is not a world of black and white Desmond is reporting from. After all, while Arleen Belle tells an endless series of lies to potential landlords, she is trying to take care of her sons. Yes, Vanetta Evans is a convicted felon who robbed two women, but she did so to provide for her own family. Perhaps virtue is a transitory state, not permanent, depending as much on the motives of the person whose actions are being scrutinized and the mindsets of the people dispensing judgment.
Compassion is usually presented as an admirable quality. Love thy neighbor as thyself. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. One love, one heart, one destiny. These are pretty sentiments consisting of pretty words, but they have no place in the world depicted in Evicted.
Compassion only brings heartache and grief to those who exhibit it. Scott Bunker is summarily evicted for letting Pam Reinke and her family stay with him after they’re evicted themselves. Crystal Mayberry becomes unhinged after allowing Arleen Belle and her boys to stay with her after they’re evicted. Larraine Warren’s daughters know better than to lend their mother money because when doing so in the past, they’ve never been repaid. In short, compassion is for suckers.
Then again, surely Desmond doesn’t believe this. Otherwise, there would be no hope for a better future. Yes, the positive effects of compassion—as opposed to the negative ones noted above—are in short supply in Evicted. Just because he’s describing a world where compassion isn’t rewarding for either the comforted or those doing the comforting, however, doesn’t mean it has no value. Instead, perhaps, this only means compassion is an underappreciated, scarce commodity which would gain both value and respect if there were more of it.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.