59 pages 1-hour read

Fear of Flying

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1973

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of cursing, rape, graphic violence, mental illness, sexual content, gender discrimination, and racism.

Isadora Zelda White Wing

Isadora is a 29-year-old twice married woman, torn between her desire for excitement and freedom, and her desire for security and love. Her full name is Isadora Zelda White Wing: Isadora after the dancer and choreographer Isadora Duncan; Zelda after Zelda Fitzgerald, the wife of novelist F. Scott Fitzgerald; White, the “bleached” form of Weiss; and Bennett’s last name, Wing, alluding to her fear of flying and her desire for the freedom implied by flight. Isadora Duncan was a famous dancer and choreographer who was unconventional, passionate, and principled, as well as committed to independent artistic expression and disdainful of rules, and Zelda Fitzgerald was the famously unconventional and rebellious wife of F. Scott Fitzgerald. Thus, Isadora claims, “With a name like Isadora Zelda it was clear what I was supposed to choose: everything my mother had been offered and had passed up” (56). Her name feels like a hint or a promise that she is meant to do the things her mother couldn’t, and it also represents the high standard or ideal her mother expects her to reach. 


She is angry about the lies society tells women about marriage—namely, that it solves all problems and gives them purpose—as well as confused about what it actually means to be a woman. Her mother taught her that a woman cannot be both a mother and an artist and frequently expressed resentment of Isadora and her sisters for having thwarted her artistic ambitions by existing. Isadora recognizes that the female artists she most admires are brave in their art, not their lives, or they spend their entire artistic careers focused on what they lack: motherhood. Isadora longs to have a child in a theoretical way, so long as the child is a girl, takes her last name, and embodies all the empowering qualities that Isadora thinks she lacks. Complicating matters is the fact that Isadora has been undergoing psychodynamic therapy for 13 years and feels no healthier or less fearful than before. She married Brian, who raped and tried to kill her during a psychotic episode, but she has internalized guilt for her decision to commit him and free herself. She says, “In a sense, I was a traitor. It had come down to a choice between me or him, and I chose me. My guilt about this haunts me still” (290).


For most of the novel, Isadora experiences guilty whenever she prioritizes her own wishes over a man’s, bored in her marriage to steady but dull Bennett, disempowered and resentful when she considers how society curtails her choices as a woman, and desirous of passion and freedom from others’ expectations. She says, “I couldn’t make sense of all the contradictions I felt. At times I was defiant and thought I had every right to snatch whatever pleasure was offered to me for the duration of my short time on earth. Why shouldn’t I be happy and hedonistic? What was wrong with it?” (173). At other times, Isadora is overwhelmed by guilt for embracing “happ[iness] and hedonis[m],” especially when it comes to her affair with Adrian. Her harsh inner critic stems from the gap between her self-image and her image of the ideal woman, gleaned from societal messaging. To her, this supreme woman “is a vehicle, a vessel, with no needs or desires of her own. When her husband beats her, she understands him. When he is sick, she nurses him […]. She is capable of absolutely everything except self-preservation. And secretly, I am always ashamed of myself for not being her” (291). That this ideal woman is an impossibility does not deter Isadora from blaming herself for failing to be her.


The more aware Isadora becomes of sexual double-standards, the more her guilt eases. She stops idealizing Adrian when she learns that he has planned, all along, to return to his safe life with his family: the very thing he charges her not to do. For a long time, she associated him with freedom, but when he says he’ll return to his wife and children, she realizes that—despite his apparent sexual freedom and part-time liberation from traditional family life—“fantasies are fantasies and you can’t live in ecstasy every day of the year. Even if you slam the door and walk out, even if you fuck everyone in sight, you don’t necessarily get closer to freedom” (357). She abandons her long-time fantasy of the “zipless fuck,” especially after she rejects the opportunity to have one on her way from Paris (and Adrian) to London (and Bennett). She realizes that she’s nursed a “disproportionate sense of guilt” (339), and that she previously “looked for the wrong things in love. I wanted to lose myself in a man, to cease to be me, to be transported to heaven on borrowed wings. Isadora Icarus, I considered calling myself” (413). She no longer wishes to “lose” herself or to become one with a partner; she realizes that she is whole and complete on her own. Thus, she is a dynamic and round protagonist whose view of the world and her place in it changes dramatically.

Bennett Wing

Isadora’s second husband, Bennett, is just one representative of her antagonist: patriarchy. It is patriarchy’s double standards for men and women that limit Isadora and ignite her rebellious urges; Bennett shares many of these standards. As the character who typically enforces her sense of the ideal woman, and her shortcomings in contrast, he symbolizes her superego. She feels guilty when she cannot pull him from his sadness and grief after his grandfather’s death. She feels guilty for finding fault with him in Heidelberg. She feels guilty for having sex with him while she thinks of other men, though it is he who does not satisfy her sexual or emotional needs. He doesn’t kiss her and or buy her flowers, yet he remains a good lover: at least better than Adrian Goodlove.


Their relationship is complicated by the fact that he is also a psychoanalyst, and he constantly uses the language of the profession to condescend to Isadora, as though he knows what is best for her better than she. In some ways, he seems almost inhuman, as she describes him as slim and smooth, odorless, and hairless, and he is the cleanest person she’s ever encountered. This, perhaps, signifies the way he stands as a sort of ideal for Isadora too: Brian was hairy and stocky, Charlie was unhygienic and always left streaks of feces on her sheets, and she had other sexual encounters with men that were either clumsy, needy, or inept. Bennett is none of these. However, Isadora also indirectly connects him with the death drive, or Thanatos. His intense grief could have sucked her in, if she’d let it, so when he refused her help, she used her writing and the emotional distance it provided to protect herself. She is alternately, and sometimes simultaneously, repulsed by and attracted to him, and though readers have no access to his internal thoughts, his actions suggest that he feels similarly.


That Bennett goes to London rather than back to their home after Isadora abandons him in Vienna suggests that he is waiting for her, that he might be open to the redefined relationship she wishes to pursue. This suggests the possibility of dynamism, but in the text proper, Bennett remains static. His last name—Wing—connects to the text’s title and “flying” as a symbol of independence: something Isadora both craves and fears, just as she craves the security Bennett provides and fears entrapment in her marriage to him. When Isadora refers to herself as a new Icarus, she says that her “borrowed wings never stayed on when [she] needed them. Maybe [she] really needed to grow [her] own” (413). Thus, she recognizes that she will not find “completion” of herself within a relationship with any man, despite his promise to protect her. Icarus’s wings were well built by his father, but they still fell off. Likewise, she cannot allow or expect Bennett Wing to be responsible for her; she must take responsibility for herself (and, continuing with the metaphor, make her own “wings”).

Adrian Goodlove

Like Bennett, Adrian is a representative of society, Isadora’s antagonist. His last name is ironic given the fact that he does not believe in the power of love to protect, comfort, or transform. His original first name, Hadrian, recalls the emperor who consolidated and secured the Roman Empire, overseeing the construction of the famed Hadrian’s Wall, the remains of which still stretch across the entire width of what is now northern England. Adrian’s father made his mother change the name for reasons of assimilation, but the novel suggests that his original name implies his destiny: He conducts his romantic life as Hadrian conducted his military career, making a serious of conquests while fortifying himself against any vulnerability. 


If Bennett represents Isadora’s superego, then Adrian represents her id. He chases passion and seems to act without regard for social norms or any traditional sense of morality. He purports to desire a lawless existence, to have sex with whomever he chooses (despite his lack of virility), and to defy convention—especially the traditional nuclear family. However, Adrian’s impotence suggests that such an existence simply isn’t possible, that the human mind will not allow it because we depend so heavily on society. This dependence is confirmed when he reveals that he cannot stay with Isadora in Paris. Although they had not determined any deadline for their relationship or discussed when they would part, he made private arrangements to meet with his wife and children in another part of France. From the moment they left Vienna (and Isadora blew up her marriage to Bennett), Adrian knew that he would eventually abandon her and return to his own safe, comfortable, and predictable life. He also let Isadora believe that he was committed to their time together, though he obviously anticipated that it would only last for a few weeks.


Isadora initially connects Adrian to Eros, Freud’s life drive and the opposite of Bennett’s Thanatos, because she associates him with unconstrained sexual desire and the relinquishing of responsibility. However, she eventually realizes that to lose herself in fantasies is itself a kind of self-annihilation or death. Their relationship breaks down as Adrian pursues his pleasure and ignores hers, except in theory. He challenges her to abandon traditional gender roles, but he still expects her to cater to his wishes. Life with Adrian isn’t devoid of rules; rather, it is characterized by new rules. Despite his occupation as a psychoanalyst, Adrian cannot face his erectile dysfunction, just as he cannot face his own sexual feelings for Bennett. He is, ultimately, a static character whose real personality, selfish motivations, and hypocrisy are revealed as having existed all along.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock analysis of every major character

Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.

  • Explore in-depth profiles for every important character
  • Trace character arcs, turning points, and relationships
  • Connect characters to key themes and plot points