God of Pain

Rina Kent

61 pages 2-hour read

Rina Kent

God of Pain

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2022

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide contains discussion of sexual content, physical abuse, emotional abuse, suicidal ideation, and graphic violence.

The Interplay of Pain, Pleasure, and Emotional Intimacy

In Rina Kent’s God of Pain, Annika Volkov and Creighton King use their BDSM dynamic as a precise way to navigate vulnerability, control, and trust. The book presents physical pain as a structured path toward intense pleasure and emotional closeness rather than an end goal. Annika and Creighton treat sadomasochism as a ritual with clear rules that lets them face their fears and desires inside a protected space. Their repeated pattern of punishment, pleasure, and careful aftercare shows how shared, consensual pain can create a level of trust and understanding that the characters may be unable to develop through familiar forms of affection.


Kent first ties physical pain to sexual pleasure through Annika’s discovery of her interest in submission. During her first “punishment” in the storage room, Creighton spanks her after she goes against his wishes and chooses another man for her “fake boyfriend” plan. The moment works as a lesson in their new dynamic when Creighton says, “From now on, when I tell you to do something, you do it” (88). Annika later admits she pushed him to see this part of him and recognizes her interest in his “deviant tastes.” Through this moment, Annika begins exploring her own desires, something she’s been withheld from doing by her restrictive upbringing.


As their relationship deepens, their dynamic shifts from simple dominance to a layered exchange of power. Annika starts using the structure Creighton creates to assert her needs and press for emotional reciprocity. She understands her submission is also important to him and begins attaching conditions to their physical encounters. She asserts her value to him when she tells him to take her on dates and adds, “If you’re going to unleash your inner sadist, unleash it on me,” while making clear she wants more than physical intensity (104). This choice turns their arrangement into something more balanced, since her consent now depends on his willingness to engage with her emotionally. She learns to provoke him to start their ritual, not out of fear, but to show her active role and her place as an equal partner in their shared form of intimacy.


The novel links their most intense scenes to quiet periods of aftercare in order to underline that their dynamic aims at connection instead of cruelty. After punishments that leave her marked, Creighton always tends to her. In one scene, while he washes her hair after a painful encounter, Creighton reveals the story of his traumatic childhood and explains how he learned to associate pain with survival. He shares this history only when she is in his care, which shows how the physical intensity that came before clears the way for honesty. The pain brings down their defenses, and the aftercare lets them rebuild with trust and affection. Creighton’s decision in the novel’s climax to kidnap Annika to his grandfather’s island overrides this balanced arrangement, and the trespasses of her consent lead her to withdraw from him emotionally, an outcome that causes Creighton to realize what he truly valued about their relationship. After they reconcile, they maintain their BDSM dynamic, but on equal terms that allow them to bond physically and emotionally.

The Struggle for Autonomy in Controlling Relationships

Annika Volkov’s path in God of Pain centers on her effort to claim autonomy while dealing with the power her Mafia family and her dominant lover, Creighton King, exert over her. Raised in a “gilded cage,” Annika starts the novel as a sheltered daughter shaped by the decisions of others. Her gradual shift toward self-determination forms the book’s main emotional arc. The narrative shows autonomy as a long process that requires Annika to confront, negotiate, and revise her boundaries while dealing with people who believe they act out of love or protection.


Her first attempts to carve out independence remain indirect. She avoids direct conflict with her family’s expectations and instead tries to work around them. She goes to college to gain temporary distance from her father’s tight control, and she attends Royal Elite University instead of King’s University, which her family has more financial and social control over. When her parents present the idea of an arranged marriage, she decides to find a “fake boyfriend” so she can choose her own romantic path. These choices show her desire for agency but also her dependence on avoidance rather than asserting what she wants. These tactics collapse once she becomes involved with Creighton, whose influence is more personal and far harder to steer.


Her relationship with Creighton creates a new arena for her need for selfhood. She accepts his dominance during their BDSM scenes but resists when he tries to control her life outside them. When he tells her to unfollow men on social media, she refuses and calls him a “tyrant.” She argues with him when he reacts possessively to her admiration for Tchaikovsky. These smaller rejections show that she protects parts of her identity from him. Her growing confidence eventually leads to a confrontation with her brother Jeremy. When he tries to confine her for her safety, she says, “I want to live, make mistakes, and correct them on my own. I want to be alive” (288). This moment marks her shift from quiet resistance to open self-assertion.


Annika reaches the peak of this journey when she refuses to be used in the conflict between Creighton and her family. When her father threatens Creighton after tracking them to a remote island, Annika points a gun at her own head to force them to submit to her will instead, leveraging their love for her. She refuses the idea that she must choose between the two men. She tells Creighton, “This is my answer, Creighton. I’d choose me” (485). She claims her life as her own and refuses to let it be fought over by men in her life. Her identity and her survival return to her hands, and she returns to both her familial and romantic relationships feeling more confident, assertive, and in control of her own choices.

Consent as a Continuous Negotiation of Power

Annika Volkov and Creighton King treat consent as something that must be revised constantly rather than fixed at the start of their relationship. Author Rina Kent shows how consent grows more complicated when a clear power imbalance shapes a couple’s dynamic. Through their charged exchanges, inside and outside their BDSM scenes, Annika and Creighton test, question, and redefine their rules in order to claim agency. Their relationship shows that consent relies on steady communication, the ability to challenge past agreements, and the understanding that approval in one area does not extend to everything.


Annika and Creighton build the base of their consensual dynamic when they settle on a safe word. Early on, Creighton tells her to choose a word that will stop any activity the moment she says it, and she chooses “violet.” The safe word gives Annika final authority during their scenes. It reminds Creighton that her submission depends on choice and that she keeps control over her safety. This shared rule lets them explore pain and pleasure with trust. Kent stresses the limits of this system by showing moments when Creighton crosses a boundary and Annika must reinforce her agency. In one scene at a pub, Creighton activates a vibrating sex toy she is wearing in front of their friends. Because they did not agree to bring their dynamic into a public space or to start a scene there, Creighton’s choice violates the rules they set. The incident leads to a confrontation that forces them to negotiate again. Annika’s refusal to let violations slide shows how consent requires her to speak clearly when Creighton goes too far.


Annika eventually links her consent to the emotional terms of the relationship as well as the physical ones. Early on, she tells Creighton she will continue their encounters only if he takes her on dates, which shifts part of the power back to her. She signals that access to her body must come with genuine connection. This idea reaches its sharpest point during their isolation on his grandfather’s island. While she refuses to use their safe word during sex, she doesn’t give consent enthusiastically; inherently, as she’s on the island by force, she’s not fully able to consent at all, completely skewing their power dynamic. Creighton notices that her eyes become “dim and lifeless” (444), reflecting the fading of their emotionally connection and, subsequently, her hope and happiness. Through this, he realizes that only full, open consent and the return of her agency can offer the relationship that he wants, thus forcing him to eventually relinquish his control and offer her equal power in the dynamic.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence