38 pages • 1-hour read
Walt WhitmanA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
At the center of a poem that so baldly celebrates working and the rewards of having an occupation is a most complicated question, never actually addressed, of what exactly is the work of a poet? It is after all the poet’s song we actually hear.
In a poem that celebrates other occupations that clearly focus on pragmatic productivity—boats docking safely, clothes getting washed, bricks being laid, timber being felled—the central figure, really the only figure in the poem, is the poet/speaker. What does a poet do? Before Whitman’s generation, the answers were fairly clear. Poets either tell stories, fictional or historical, in lines of engaging sonic delight that manipulate rhythm and rhyme to enhance the reading/listening experience and at the same time reveal the poet’s deft command of language, or they use the chiseled lines of carefully metered poetry to inspire, to share lessons, to teach insights to live better, more moral lives.
Neither appears to apply here—the poem offers no tidy moral insight, it shares no story, and its manipulations of language, its rhythm and rhyme schemes, seem at best careless and at worst juvenile. What then is the poet’s work? Infused by the soaring arguments of Whitman’s generation of Transcendentalists with their conception of a material world that sustains a profoundly spiritual reality, Whitman offers a third possible role for the poet: a spiritual seer, a mystic, more like a religious figure or prophet than an artist, not just inspiring but radically realigning the axis of the listener’s perception of the world. Poets see so that others may glimpse. We see slivers, poets see the whole.
The opening line stakes out the poem’s conception of the role of the poet: “I hear America singing” (Line 1)—the uncompromising audacity, the sheer nerve, the ego of Whitman. But this is not Whitman speaking. This is not Walter Whitman, failed New Jersey housepainter and out-of-work printer—this is Walt Whitman, priest-seer, able to tap into the deepest reservoirs of spiritual energy, able to hear and see and feel what the rest of us cannot, and in sharing that aural vision, the joyous song of America working, he offers not the chance to hear it for ourselves—after all, no Christian is expected to possess the spiritual sensibility of the Christ—but rather we are to trust in the sensibilities and spiritual reach of the poet/seer and in turn embrace the offer to celebrate labor, what would, without the poet/seer’s message, corrode the spirit day after soul-crushing day.
This poem is about the business of defining a national identity. The poet could easily have left out the word “America” and substituted some baggy, generic term: workers, the world, people, neighbors. Whitman conceived of himself as just exactly the sort of poet his nation needed. The job of that American Poet (capitalization required) was to define at last the American identity itself. American poets could not afford to fritter away the gift of poetic expression on mundane topics such as daffodils or snowy mountains, nor could they while away their time pondering big (and empty) questions about death or art or love. What is an American? For more than a millennium, the national identities of the Western cultures that birthed the American experiment—England, Italy, Spain, Germany to name the most obvious—had been created around the celebration of the loftiest of their people: princes, popes, artists, generals. The national identities of these other nations, although built on the grunt labor and diligent effort of the working class, ignored (or worse assumed) the working class in any definition of their national identity. For Whitman, the sort of national identity allows the commonest of a nation’s people to become its greatest asset and in turn central to understanding the character of a nation. Americans do not command great armies; Americans repair shoes and wash laundry. That is the American identity, humble and yet self-sufficient, vulnerable yet heroic, overworked but joyous.
When Whitman composed “I Hear America Singing,” his nation was barely a generation from the second defeat of the British empire that had secured the independence that was itself barely 50 years old. But that emerging nation was also a handful of months away from coming apart at every nail. What is an American? For Whitman’s generation, the nation poised so precariously between birth and speechlessly quick death that is hardly a rhetorical question. For Whitman, America’s identity will not, cannot come from its presidents, its bishops, its writers, or its generals. For Whitman, the American identity must perforce be rooted in the very people European history and their national identities had so roundly ignored: workers, the poorly educated great Unwashed Hordes whose anything-but-meaningless lives for centuries had been sustained only by routine and whose days were defined by the trivia of busy-ness and the uninspiring logic of endurance. Those workers define America, they are the American identity.
It is a curiously emphatic message that sounds a bit like feel-good pablum of late night informercial motivational speakers. We are one. We are lumberjacks. We are bricklayers. We are, all of us, farmers in our own way working our own kind of plows. The logic behind the premise of “I Hear America Singing” is as simple and as direct as the message itself: we are, all of us, part of a single yet grand organic webbing.
This is not a poem about shoemakers or farmers or bricklayers or even poet/seers for that matter. What they assume, the poet tacitly argues, so should you. The theme is as striking as it is complex: the poem argues against the idea of social, economic, or even occupational boundaries. Such labels inevitably engender a caste system that evaluates people by their work, by their income, by their economic status. More than a century before geneticists would confirm that the entire spectrum of living species from spores on a shower curtain to the President of the United States is created by the different interactions of just four bases—adenine, thymine, cytosine, and guanine (what could be simpler?)—Whitman declares that humanity is a single cooperative organism, that carpenters and sailors, seamstresses and lumberjacks (shoemakers and kings, for that matter) are essentially the same. They sing for us all, by being part of humanity itself, sharing that common blood (the term “consanquinity,” which Emerson borrowed from English law concerning how property can be inherited within a family, suggests this grand mutual bond), their song is ours song, their joy, our joy. Much as in genetics, individually spun iterations of those four bases defies the very notion of individuality, in the end there is no Me, only Us; no self, only species; no loneliness, only ignorance of our unity. If religion, politics, nationalism, class, ethnicity all divide us, it is only because we cannot bring ourselves to abandon entirely the simplification of Us versus Them. Seeing the shoemaker, Whitman joyously proclaims, is easy—being the shoemaker, not so much. Only then does a person tap into a suddenly radiant organic entity, a cosmos wider than the individual, broader than the family, and more enduring than any nationality or ethnicity.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.