53 pages • 1-hour read
Alicia ThompsonA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Fraught familial relationships are at the heart of the novel’s depiction of Phoebe, Conner, and their childhood trauma. The author paints a vivid portrait of their parents’ tumultuous marriage, showing its impact on Phoebe and Conner, and explores how it continued to shape them as adults.
Severe dysfunction characterized Phoebe and Conner’s early childhood. Their parents’ explosive marriage was volatile and emotionally abusive, and it put a serious strain on the entire family. Phoebe’s father was prone to fits of rage that, because they often emerged out of nowhere, created extreme anxiety in their mother. She consequently found it difficult to devote her attention to parenting, and Phoebe ultimately came to characterize her mother as aloof and overly focused on appearances. She doesn’t feel that she and her mother had an authentic relationship, even after the divorce. Their father was similarly detached in his own relationship with Conner, and each child grew up with the knowledge that their parents were never fully invested in them. This became a source of deep hurt to each of them, though they eventually addressed it in different ways.
Each child moved in with one of their parents after the divorce, which truncated their relationship with each other. Phoebe recalls their being close as young children, but after their teenage years they drifted apart. When Phoebe moved away with her mother, the two didn’t remain in touch. When she returns, Conner is largely a stranger to her. She has an outdated understanding of who he is, and only when they being spending time together does she get to know him again and develop an adult relationship with him. Their parents’ stormy marriage thus impacted not only their childhoods but also their adult lives: They’re quasi-estranged as adults because of their family’s fracture when they were children.
As an adult, Phoebe dislikes her father and has largely written him out of her life, noting, “He hadn’t been a part of my life since I was teenager” (25). Although she recognizes how damaging his behavior was, she has struggled to process its impact on her development and chooses to ignore her childhood rather than face it. This is partly why she retreats into talk of serial killers whenever the conversation steers toward her father: It’s easier for her to analyze terrifying strangers than think about how her father shaped her growth and development. Nevertheless, Phoebe inherits significant aspects of her father’s personality. Although she isn’t volatile or prone to fits of rage, she’s emotionally distant and struggles to put energy into relationships. She’s solitary and has few friends and connections. She sees herself as incapable of love and doesn’t seek out meaningful romantic partnerships.
Conner, on the other hand, chooses a path of self-actualization and even finds that he has some sympathy for his parents. With Shani’s support, he seeks out a professional therapist and spends years processing the events of his childhood. He thinks critically about how his parents’ relationship impacted him and about what it must have been like for his mother in particular to be in such a toxic, emotionally abusive marriage. His primary takeaway from therapy is that he doesn’t want to repeat the mistakes of his parents, and he opens himself up emotionally to Shani, building a healthy, loving partnership.
One of the novel’s focal points is the importance of personal growth and identity development. At the beginning of the novel, Phoebe is still reeling from her childhood trauma and struggles to build and maintain meaningful relationships. By the novel’s end, she’s embedded in a strong social network and has a committed romantic relationship with Sam. She achieves these large-scale changes by rewriting the false narrative she has about herself and by opening herself up to friendship, strengthening her sibling bond, and allowing herself to fall in love.
Phoebe struggles emotionally because of the bad example that her parents volatility set and the trauma of their divorce. She emerged from childhood with the idea that real love is unattainable and that everyone is ultimately reducible to the worst parts of themselves. For this reason, she maintains emotional distance between herself and everyone she meets. This is a coping mechanism, albeit an unhealthy one, to safeguard her from additional emotional harm. After beginning to pursue Sam and then regretting it, she observes, “This was why I preferred to keep people at arm’s length. Things got so much more complicated when you actually cared if someone sent you a text, or accepted an invitation, or wanted to hang out” (104).
It's clear that her parents’ marriage became the rubric for how Phoebe views all romantic relationships, and to move beyond that limiting belief she must engage in significant self-reflection. She’s shocked when people like Conner and Allison point out that her perception of people isn’t always entirely accurate, yet when she pauses to consider their assertions, she realizes that the truth of what they’re saying. She thinks about Conner and realizes that while she considered him goofy when they were young, he’s now a considerate, committed, loving partner to Shani. In addition, Phoebe reflects on herself: She characterizes herself as tough-skinned and unapproachable, but she’s capable of caring behavior: She wants the best for her brother, Allison, and Sam, and she rescues a homeless cat. Phoebe realizes that, although she can be aloof, that isn’t the extent of her personality. She begins to understand that identity is multifaceted.
Armed with the ability to rewrite narratives of both herself and others, Phoebe begins to alter her orientation toward people. Although she and Allison had a serious falling-out as teenagers, she makes an effort to spend time with her friend. She gets to know Allison again, accepts help from her, and remembers how much they have in common. She listens when Allison shares her perspective on Phoebe’s troubles and, similar to how she reassesses Conner, she realizes that Allison too is in a committed, healthy relationship. As the novel ends, Phoebe has reunited with Allison and has a real friend in her.
She and Conner likewise reconnect. At the beginning of the novel, she notes their distance and lack of a meaningful sibling bond. Because they lived with different parents after the divorce, she notes that they didn’t truly grow up together. In the years since she left Florida, they’ve largely been out of touch. Because she allows herself to be open to becoming closer to her sibling and because Conner is so reflective, she begins to realize that their past doesn’t need to define their future. Conner is instrumental in Phoebe’s newfound ability to think critically about their childhood, and he provides an example of someone who has already completed the healing process: Conner comes to exemplify what Phoebe might be capable of if she reflects on her past, is honest about its impact on her, and then releases her anger.
Her relationship with Sam similarly evidences a growth curve. She’s initially defensive and combative in their conversations. Even after they begin sleeping together, she’s hesitant to become closer to him. She initially doesn’t want the kind of committed relationship that he does and eventually makes that clear. However, Phoebe loves Sam and does want something more long-term with him; she’s just unsure how to make that happen. Sam, like Conner, is both self-reflective and emotionally intelligent. He understands Phoebe better than she initially understands herself. Through both conversation and patience, he gently leads her to the realization that she’s capable of love. She must make the final leap on her own, but she eventually manages to admit her feelings to both herself and Sam.
The novel’s interrogation of the societal fascination with high-profile serial killings and the success of the true crime genre is complex and multifaceted. Through Phoebe’s characterization, the author discusses true crime’s appeal to individuals, and through Phoebe’s depiction of her dissertation process, the author makes a broader argument about the role of true crime within society as a whole.
Phoebe’s personal fascination with high-profile killers and true crime is multifold and interrogates the appeal of true crime to individuals who read books in the genre, watch television shows like Dateline, or listen to one of the many podcasts that have become popular during the last decade. Phoebe is interested in true crime partly because it speaks to her own particular fears, anxieties, and beliefs about the world. She’s interested in gender and in gender justice, and she’s fiercely critical of patriarchal societal organization. She notes the high percentage of serial killers who are men and sees contemporary society as posing many dangers for women. She’s instantly mistrustful of Sam not only because of his appearance, but also because he’s out late at night alone and, she worries, may be on the hunt for female victims. However, Phoebe eventually admits that her interest in true crime is part of an unhealthy coping mechanism. She would rather analyze high-profile killings than reflect on her own parents’ stormy marriage, and she uses true crime as escapism. Her interest in it thus reflects how she views society in general as well as her personal, familial difficulties.
The book is also interested, however, in the cultural appeal of true crime, or what the author terms “our fascination with serial killers as a culture” (18). The argument that Phoebe makes in her dissertation is complex, nuanced, and addresses trends in scholarly, academic analysis of the true crime phenomenon. Phoebe notes that true crime “tends to reflect and shape our attitudes about crime in general” (118). She points out that the genre has shifted since the publication of Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood. At the time of its publication, the cultural revolution of the 1960s was underway. and the US was confronting an entirely new set of norms. The book reflected widespread societal fear about the breakdown of traditional values and worries about a potential crime wave as norms of behavior and community crumbled.
In addition, Phoebe points to the more “sensationalistic, hardboiled accounts written in the 80s and 90s” (118). Here, too, the novel makes an astute observation about how the genre shifted as one cultural era ended and another began. Both decades saw an increase in urban crime that led to widespread societal panic about what came to be labeled “super-predators,” hardened criminals who would prey on the innocent until locked away for life. The national crime bill that was passed as a result, though now unpopular, sought to address crime by increasing penalties, sentences, and instances in which offenders were incarcerated without the possibility of parole. The fact that true crime became more lurid and sensationalistic during this era, Phoebe argues, makes sense: It reflected shifting societal attitudes toward crime.
As society underwent another significant shift, both juridical and public discourse increasingly focused on rehabilitation rather than punitive responses to criminality, and true crime likewise shifted again: Personal, nuanced explorations of everyone involved in high-profile crimes, from victims and communities to offenders, are more common. True crime writing in a more contemporary cultural landscape seeks less to shock and more to promote reflection and understanding. Phoebe points all of this out in her dissertation and during various monologues, placing this work of popular fiction in dialogue with key meta-conversations about the appeal of true crime, both in academia and within the broader public.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.