54 pages 1-hour read

Edward Ashton

Mickey7

Fiction | Novel | Adult

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Identity, Personhood, and Self-Awareness

The question of what it means to be human is central to Mickey7, as protagonist Mickey Barnes questions both his identity and humanity throughout. This search for identity and meaning also plays a key role in the development of his character. As an Expendable, Mickey frequently dies, and his consciousness is uploaded into a newly reprinted body. After each death, Mickey wrestles with his own self-awareness, wondering if he’s still the same person after he’s been reprinted. He sees a distinction between each manifestation of himself, even if others do not; when Mickey7 contemplates letting himself die in the crevice to wake up as Mickey8, he thinks he would know that he wasn’t the same person, even if others wouldn’t: “Nasha and Berto might not be able to tell the difference, but deep down on some level below reason, I’m pretty sure I’d know I was dead” (8). Mickey7’s self-awareness and his sense that when he is reprinted, he becomes a new person, causes him to struggle with the concept of himself as a clone who everyone else sees as identical to all the Mickeys that came before.


Everyone in Mickey7’s sphere has a distinct point of view on his humanity, but each of these perspectives causes Mickey7 to cling more firmly to the idea of his own individuality and personhood. Jemma, his Expendable trainer, tries to use a thought experiment to give Mickey a new perspective on his identity and individuality. She introduces the Ship of Theseus, or Theseus’s Paradox, a thought experiment that questions whether a ship is the same ship if every component has been replaced over time. To draw a parallel between the Ship of Theseus and Mickey’s own situation, she asks, “What difference does it make if he replaces every component one by one, or if he replaces them all at once?” (93). She tries to reinforce the idea that even if his entire body is changed in an instant, he’s still the same as any else, as all people’s bodies change over time through cellular regeneration. However, Mickey7 isn’t interested in being seen as the same Mickey—he believes that each Mickey is a distinct individual. 


In addition, many of the people in the colony have a complicated view of Expendables based on their religion, but even those who don’t see him as a reminder of their mortality. He notes that the Natalists avoid him, but “even most of the people who don’t think [he’s] a soulless monster don’t seem to want to associate with someone who’s under what amounts to a perpetual death sentence” (189). These perspectives, which depend on the idea that the true Mickey died the first time and those that followed were hollow replications, continue to deny Mickey7 his own distinct identity, separate from other past Mickeys. However, Mickey7 resists this idea; the idea that he is an individual distinct from other Mickeys is important to his identity and personhood. He yearns to be viewed by others as human in order to confirm his view of himself as a distinct person from the other Mickeys and as a real person. Throughout Mickey7, author Edward Ashton probes what gives us personhood and makes us individuals as Mickey7 struggles to define himself and explore what it means to be human through the lens of his own unique experience.

The Ethics of the Human Drive for Survival

The desire to survive is innate in human beings, and survival plays an integral role in the development of the Mickey7 narrative. It is the driving force behind the colony’s establishment and the motivation behind their continued struggle. Through the colony’s dire situation, the novel explores the ethics of colonization, in which Expendables like Mickey and native inhabitants of the colonized planets are sacrificed to ensure the survival of the colonies. 


When the colonial mission of the Drakkar arrives in Niflheim, they discover that the planet is barely habitable for humans, as the frigid weather and lack of breathable oxygen present extreme challenges to the human colonists. They are not the first colony to face difficulty establishing themselves on the new planet. As Mickey7 explains, “It should be pretty clear by now that launching a colony mission is in most ways a desperate act. It’s expensive, it has a high probability of failure, and even if it succeeds, the place you’re going to will probably be significantly worse than the place you came from” (254). Even as the Diaspora gains successful colonies, the act of colonization remains “desperate” because of the high possibility that the colonists fail to survive. In addition, there is always the possibility that the colonists’ survival comes at the expense of the planet’s native inhabitants. As Mickey7 states, “It’s not true that every time we make landfall on a new planet we wind up dying. I mean, somebody almost always does. It’s just not necessarily us” (249). With this observation, Mickey7 highlights the fact that when the colonists survive and thrive, they often do it at the expense of the native inhabitants of the planet.


The novel also explores the questions surrounding the ethics of survival through Mickey’s character. With his particular situation, his desire to survive conflicts with his role as an Expendable in a colony fixated on making Niflheim a survivable landscape. As an Expendable, it is Mickey’s job to die—his priority is not his own survival, but the colony’s. However, through Mickey, the novel explores the ethical quagmire of cloning to provide the colony with sacrificial bodies. Mickey7 notes that “there are also some ethical issues with pulling someone off the streets or out of prison and forcing him to die for you over and over and over again” (195). In addition, cloning opens the door to questionable behavior, as Mickey7 notes that “some really bad things happened in the early days of bio-printed bodies and personality downloads” (10). Mickey7 struggles to let go of his desire to live, and he struggles to imagine how someone forced to become an Expendable would cope. By considering how Mickey’s need for survival intersects with the survival of the colony, as well as how the survival of the colony can affect the planet, the novel considers the ethical boundaries of putting the survival of the colony above all else.

The Conflict Between Individual and Collective Needs

The tension between the needs of the individual versus the collective is at the heart of the conflict in Mickey7. The colonists of the Drakkar expedition must work together to survive on a freezing planet with limited oxygen and food, and the novel continuously puts individual and community needs in conflict. Nowhere is this truer than in the relationship between Mickey and the colony, and through his position, Ashton explores the delicate balance between individual and collective needs. 


Of all the people on Niflheim, Mickey, as an Expendable, is expected to sacrifice his individual desires most for the sake of the collective good. Mickey dies over and over again, doing the necessary and lethal jobs that keep the colony going. However, as the novel continues, Mickey7 begins to wonder if the sacrifice was worth it as he becomes more attuned to his humanity and inherent worth. When Mickey8 almost kills him, Mickey7 thinks, “Kneeling there on the decking, my face six inches from the disassembler field interface, looking at the prospect of being converted into slurry for the hungry colonists of Niflheim, I find myself once again contemplating the question of whether I made the right call” (41). The use of the term “again” highlights that this is not the first instance that has made Mickey7 question his decision to become an Expendable, illustrating his repeated and growing disillusionment. While Mickey’s lives are repeatedly sacrificed for the good of the colony, his individuality is sacrificed as well, as with each death, his corpse is repurposed into food for his fellow colonists. With his character’s development and growth, the novel questions to what extent the individual should be expected to forgo their own needs in favor of those of the community. 


The novel balances its exploration of this theme through Mickey’s character with references to the fates of other colonies. The failed colony of Gault illustrates that, while Mickey’s continued deaths and sacrifices are challenging, the spirit of collectivism is better than a fixation on individualism. As Mickey7 explains, “The foundational principle on Gault was supposed to be Radical Liberty and Self Reliance, which in practice meant that none of the hundred and twenty colonists who made landfall there had the least interest in contributing anything whatsoever to the common good” (203). The wealthy people who founded Gault sought to create a community where they paid no tax and built no communal infrastructure. While this seemed ideal to them at the beginning, when Alan Manikova arrived and began wreaking havoc in their community, they had no way to collectively deal with it, due to rampant mistrust and a lack of communal resources. This led Gault to crumble, exemplifying what happens when individual desire triumphs over collective needs. Niflheim, in comparison, does not fall, thanks to the colonists’ collaborations and Mickey’s sacrifices. His efforts and willingness to put the community before himself are invaluable in developing a successful colony, highlighting the importance of considering one’s position within the collective whole.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence