60 pages • 2-hour read
Gerardo Sámano CórdovaA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section includes discussion of child death, disordered eating, animal cruelty and death, graphic violence, sexual content, cannibalism, and death.
In Monstrilio, the line between human and monster is often difficult to define. The novel undermines the clear distinction between humanity and monstrosity by showing how monsters can be human and humans can be monstrous, thereby challenging the idea that humanity is by definition separate from monstrosity.
Monstrilio is the novel’s central “monster,” yet this classification stands in stark contrast to his defining characteristics of innocence, gentleness, and general bewilderment regarding his human body and the expectations that accompany it. As the lung starts to grow into Monstrilio, the creature is violent and carnivorous, but there is also an element of innocence that softens his monstrosity. When the lung attacks Lucía’s dog, he “acted without malice” (57); he was simply hungry and did what was natural to him. As Monstrilio gets bigger, he sometimes wreaks havoc, slaughtering neighborhood pets or slicing open Joseph’s arm with his sharp claws. However, Magos and Joseph don’t fault him; they remain convinced that Monstrilio only acts this way because “[h]e doesn’t know any better” (141).
Magos, Joseph, and Lena all love Monstrilio, yet Lena disagrees with Magos’s insistence that the creature can “learn” to control his impulses. Lena loves Monstrilio precisely because he is a monster, challenging the assumption that humanity and civility are inherently superior traits. The central question of the novel then centers around what Monstrilio is “supposed to be” (148). Anxious to make Monstrilio less “wild,” Magos wants to cut off his arm-tail. However, Joseph and Lena worry that his wildness is an important part of who Monstrilio is: Without his “Monstrilioness,” Joseph fears he will be simply “an empty husk” (197).
With his arm-tail amputated, Monstrilio does, in fact, grow into a boy-shaped body, but Magos’s assumption that this would be an improvement is misguided. Instead, Monstrilio’s new shape comes with a whole host of human expectations that continually confuse and frustrate him. Like Monstrilio, the boy-shaped M is “hungry all the time,” but now he “know[s] he shouldn’t be” (273). Becoming more human does not eradicate M’s monstrous impulses, but makes them seem more wrong. Nevertheless, M tries to be the boy his parents want him to be, exhibiting a sense of empathy and emotional intelligence that contrasts with his monstrous tendencies, pretending, for example, that he isn’t hungry because he can see Magos and Joseph are pleased to think he is “getting better” and “[m]ore capable of being human” (288).
In the end, however, M recognizes that being human is a charade he cannot sustain. By doing what they believed was best for M, Magos and Joseph forced him to suppress his true nature, yet M’s physical body begins to rebel. His arm-tail begins to regrow, along with the fur that covered him as Monstrilio. Stepping into the darkness, M is able to release the human expectations that are not his “to carry anymore” (324), finding freedom and release in embracing his true monstrous self.
Monstrilio explores the fear that love is inherently conditional and that individuals have to be a certain way to receive love and affection from those around them. Fighting through loss, grief, and uncertainty, the novel’s protagonists struggle to relate to one another in ways that are healthy and meaningful to all parties.
With the arrival of Monstrilio, Magos and Joseph fall in love with the creature, connecting with him despite their complicated relationship with one another. However, their love for Monstrilio is complex, shaped by their own grief and trauma. Magos loves and protects Monstrilio, but her deep grief and desire to recreate Santiago often leave her unable to clearly differentiate between the two for much of the novel, as witnessed in her insistence on calling M “Santiago” and sometimes responding to him as if he were her dead son. Joseph doesn’t share Magos’s belief that Monstrilio is Santiago reborn, but the creature is still “another” son to him, giving him purpose and a distraction from his grief. Meanwhile, M struggles to feel unconditionally loved because he is not sure whether he is loved for himself or as a mere substitute for Santiago, especially after he witnesses Magos’s performance art about her grief.
This fear of conditional love also shapes other relationships in the text. Lena, for example, is deeply traumatized by her childhood experience of having an abusive mother who considered her a “demon.” Lena recalls how she tried to win her mother’s love by trying to be exactly what her mother expected a “good girl” to be, only to realize it was impossible. It was only after being sent to live with her aunt that Lena experienced unconditional love, with her aunt accepting her and encouraging her in a way her mother never did. Similarly, Joseph’s fear of not being worthy impacts his relationship with Peter. He fears to tell Peter the truth about M and about his complicated past, fearing that Peter will leave him the moment he knows Joseph more authentically.
Despite these fears, the novel ultimately suggests that love can indeed be unconditional and can endure despite challenges and differences. At the novel’s close, M shares moments of true, uncomplicated contentment with Magos and Joseph, having witnessed how they have both protected and defended him despite his “monstrosity” and how even Magos now sees him as a separate being, not a new Santiago. The impending wedding between Peter and Joseph ends the novel on a double note of hope, suggesting that new loves can eventually become as enduring as old ones.
Monstrilio is a novel about grief and its complex effects on individuals and families. For the characters, grief is simultaneously an intensely isolating and unifying experience: It renders them incomprehensible to one another while unavoidably pushing them together, revealing the complicated nature of family dynamics in the face of grief.
When Santiago dies, Joseph and Magos’s experiences of grief confuse one another, creating estrangement instead of mutual support. Magos becomes overwhelmed and numb, struggling to feel and articulate her emotions, while Joseph’s grief is more overt, with Joseph crying and being unable to eat, shower, or get out of bed. Joseph misinterprets Magos’s lack of tears as evidence that she has quickly moved on from the loss. Their differing reactions illustrate the social expectations surrounding mourning and how failure to meet those expectations is sometimes misinterpreted by others as a lack of genuine sorrow, creating tensions even in the most intimate relationships.
As Monstrilio grows and begins to speak, Joseph moves back in with Magos, illustrating how their grief unites them even as it changes the dynamic of their relationship. Once founded on love, their partnership is now built on loss, and Joseph feels as if they are “acting” at being a family. Their differing attitudes to Monstrilio also reflect how their experiences of grieving continue to diverge. Magos begins to regard Monstrilio as a new form of Santiago, even calling M by Santiago’s name and demonstrating a maternal protectiveness towards him even when Monstrilio is still just a hungry, sentient lung. Joseph, by contrast, understands that M is a different being, and sometimes feels guilty at the thought that he should still be mourning his son instead of devoting his energy to Monstrilio. These tensions deepen the rift between Magos and Joseph, ultimately resulting in their permanent separation.
Grief also impacts found family and new romantic relationships. Lena struggles to balance supporting Magos and Joseph and their grief while navigating her own complicated feelings about Monstrilio, feeling both a part of the couple’s loss and yet excluded from important aspects of it. Joseph later begins a new relationship, but his fiancé, Peter, often feels confused and isolated, as he does not know or understand how grief has impacted Joseph. The secrets surrounding Monstrilio and Joseph’s unwillingness to share with his new partner illustrate the incomprehensibility of communicating the magnitude of the loss he, Magos, and others close to Santiago experienced.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.