48 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, child death, and suicidal ideation.
Evelyn’s experiences of humans in lifetime after lifetime convince her that humans are a blight—a damaging force on the world and each other. When Evelyn describes Nauru, for example, she faults humans for the toll they’ve taken on the natural landscape. She says, “It was beautiful, in an apocalyptic sort of way. Almost a third of it had been strip-mined […] leaving behind a jagged plateau […] It was even more dystopian from the land [than the water], abandoned tram tracks and rusted kerosene tins littering the once-lush landscape” (48). People ravaged the land while mining for resources and then left the detritus of their exploitation behind, failing even to take their garbage with them once they finished exhausting the natural world. The land itself is so beautiful that it cannot help but remain so, though now in an “apocalyptic” way—an adjective that hints at the end of the world, brought about by humans.
This destructiveness extends to other humans. During World War I, Evelyn reflects on the horrors of trench warfare, saying, “How simple and beautiful life could have been. How far from that humanity had strayed” (82). Every aspect of life is made painful during the war, from the scratchy uniforms that soldiers must wear to the incredible loss of life caused by the deployment of new and inhumane weaponry. It’s so horrific that Evelyn and Arden consider ending their lives early—an ironic response, as their destructive relationship to one another crystallizes the idea that humans cannot help but hurt others, even when they love them.
However, this idea receives significant revision by the end of the novel. As Evelyn notes, humanity is also capable of great goodness: “No matter which life I’d been in, there had always been a push and pull to the universe; without light there was no shade. It was yin and yang. The karmic, cosmic balance of it all” (289). Her words suggest that the good and bad of humanity can be difficult to disentangle—an idea embodied in the recasting of the violence of Evelyn and Arden’s relationship as a form of selfless love, with Arden killing Evelyn to spare her worse suffering. Humanity can be loving and giving, and it is ultimately this capacity that the novel highlights, even as it acknowledges its potential to go astray.
While Evelyn laments humanity’s destructiveness, she also notes that the natural world seems little kinder: “Life after life, cruelty after cruelty, and the unbearable weight of being human was beginning to wear me down. The constant cycle of love and loss, as inevitable and natural as the rolling seasons” (13). In fact, the correspondence that she suggests between the highs and lows of human life and the changing of the seasons is as close to resonance as the two ever come. More often than not, nature strikes her as merely detached from human suffering, though it feels to her as if it should not be.
This “apathy” remains constant in the face of both large- and small-scale human tragedies. Evelyn is dismayed by the loss of life in the war and how nature simply carries on, as though nothing is amiss in the world. Of this destruction, she says, “It never failed to amaze me […] that the elements cared not for human pain. That the sky and its stars paid no heed to the obliterated corpses below. That the birds still sang each morning, no matter how many men had fallen the night before” (82). The incredible loss of life feels as though it should impact everything in the world, yet it doesn’t register at all. Similarly, she says of her existence in Wales, “Tragedy struck the Blythe family often and hard, like a river flooding the same sorry houses year after year” (12). Her simile compares the way her family is repeatedly visited by tragedy to the way that a river might flood the same exact areas again and again, despite the damage it’s already inflicted, implying a sense of cosmic injustice: The world does not care that it is doling out suffering disproportionately.
Thus, in different lifetimes, Evelyn refers to “the indifferent stars” and “the oblivious sunset” when she considers the way that her and Arden’s lives (34, 84)—as well as those of countless others—are permitted to blink out without any apparent change in nature. She is struck by the indifferent beauty of the changing leaves outside the Vermont psychiatric hospital, even as patients are tortured within. During the witch hunts in Norway, she describes how “a pod of whales dance[s] as though human hysteria [is] of no consequence to them” (178). This leads her to realize that “beneath the great canopy of the stars, we [are] nothing” (293), even though we feel like everything. It’s a thought that makes her feel small, both for better and for worse.
The premise of Our Infinite Fates hinges on the mutability of both gender and orientation, at least across lifetimes; Arden and Evelyn live their first lives as women in Ancient Greece but after that are variously reincarnated in differently sexed bodies. Their attraction to one another is constant, however, and neither experiences significant dysphoria in the bodies they inhabit, implying that orientation and gender are fluid, as well as shaped at least in part by circumstance and culture.
For Evelyn in particular, gender identity ebbs and flows in ways that may be interesting but are ultimately not particularly relevant to her sense of who she and Arden are, individually or together. She calls gender norms “perpetually confusing” because they are constantly changing with time and place and have little to no correspondence to who she feels she actually is. Sex feels equally remote: As she says, “I’m just me. No particular body feels more ‘right’ than the other” (114). She views Arden through a similar lens. In Wales, she thinks, “Arden could be anywhere. Could be anyone” (20). Of Arden’s essential self, Evelyn says, “What fascinated me, what compelled me so profoundly, was that theirs was a soul in the truest sense. A way of thinking, a way of feeling, their emotional contours shifting with culture and history and experience but never yielding entirely” (72). Her use of gender-neutral they/them pronouns to refer to Arden, here and in other passages, captures her sense that sex and gender are not core features of who Arden is in the way that, for example, his love of reading and writing, his thoughtfulness, and his caution are. This shapes her attraction to him. While her attraction to him may take different forms depending on the bodies they are inhabiting—of their time in Nauru, she says, “We’d both been born girls in this life, and I adored the softness of it, all sweet tongues and gentle edges” (47)—she is drawn to him regardless of sex and gender.
Arden’s orientation is similarly elastic over the centuries, though his sense of sex and gender is somewhat more fixed. He remembers almost every lifetime, but he claims to feel most at home in a male body. While this suggests some limits to gender’s fluidity, it is notable that the first body Arden recalls was male. Evelyn, on the other hand, has forgotten most of their lifetimes: That her sense of identity is more fluid than Arden’s suggests that familiarity can crystallize gender, making it feel more fixed than it is. The names by which the characters largely refer to themselves and each other underscore this point: “Arden” and “Evelyn” were the names that each bore in the first lifetime that Arden remembers, and these are the names they call one another for the next 1,000 years, suggesting that what is merely familiar can come to feel inevitable and unwavering.
In lifetime after lifetime, Evelyn ponders why she and Arden must repeat the same cycle over and over again. To her, even their love feels fated: “Sometimes I feel like I have no choice […] Not in a bad way. In an our-souls-are-destined-to-meet kind of way” (50). She even refers to an invisible tether that binds them to one another, implying supernatural involvement. Despite knowing (more of) the truth of their relationship, Arden speaks similarly, telling Evelyn, “I have to kill you, in every life. That is our true destiny. The true reason we were born within moments of each other. Gods-fated” (221). The characters’ sense that they have little control over their destinies contributes to their cynicism, yet the novel ultimately suggests that if there is a greater power guiding human events, it is one that originates within them: What seems like fate is actually love.
Indeed, Evelyn feels the bonds of love with others just as keenly as she does with Arden. She says, for example, “In truth, a part of me believed that everyone I’d ever loved would come back to me again in another life, in another form […] but that energy would still thrum between us, that recycled love, that historic bond” (36-37). The metaphor likening love to energy, which can be neither created nor destroyed, underscores Evelyn’s contention that love connects souls in lifetime after lifetime, leading them to reconnect over and over despite having no memory of prior lives. She says, “[L]ost souls were drawn to the love still felt for them by the living. This meant that parents were often reborn as their children’s own children, and siblings who died together were reborn as twins” (37). Being able to observe this phenomenon herself, again and again, has convinced her that this is how love works. Further evidence for Evelyn’s theory of love is provided by the way that Léon Cazares is drawn to Gracie Blythe in Evelyn’s final lifetime. He doesn’t know that he loved her in a past life—only that he is drawn to her now.
The resolution to the novel’s central mystery emphasizes that love, not fate, is steering the characters’ lives. Notably, Evelyn and Arden are not “destined” to be together in their first incarnation; as Daphne and Calliope, they simply fall in love. It is only thanks to the original deal that Evelyn makes with the Mother—one that allows her to reunite with Calliope—that the pair become supernaturally bound in some way. Thus, what looks like fate is really a love so strong that Evelyn is willing to promise away their eternal futures to retain it. Likewise, it is Arden’s love for Evelyn that leads him to kill her again and again; it is not destiny but a choice he makes to spare her worse suffering. Even the “tether” that purportedly binds them is a misunderstanding, linking them not to one another but to the Mother and thus preserving their love as a force in its own right. While Evelyn and Arden discuss love as “[a]n endless tempting of fate” (265), it becomes clear that something like the opposite is true; far from being subject to fate, love creates it.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.