57 pages 1-hour read

Play Nice

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of gender discrimination, mental illness, substance dependency, graphic violence, and death.

Clio Barnes

Clio, the novel’s dynamic protagonist, is very much the product of her parents’ union, though she doesn’t realize it initially. She has learned from her mother that “the easiest way to tell who a man really is, is to injure his ego and see how he reacts” (3), and she employs this strategy almost the moment the narrative begins. However, when she considers that Alexandra would be “proud” of her for planning to use a relative stranger for sex and comfort, Clio changes course.


Clio tries to harden herself against emotion, believing that her mother’s experience proves that women who allow emotion to control them cannot survive. At the same time, life with her “steady” father has taught her that women who are pretty, agreeable, and even a little helpless elicit the most and best kind of attention from men. While she attributes her unwillingness to cook for herself to “feminism,” she also feigns overwhelm to manipulate James into catering to her dislike of taking the train. In other words, she curates her identity, moment to moment, to prompt the response she wants from others.


Clio’s ability to manipulate leads her to believe that she is “the family’s social lubricant, the special sauce” (12). She thinks that no one can say “no” to her, but this dynamic angers her sisters more than it endears her to them. Clio consciously imbibed her mother’s opinions on female selfishness, though Daphne and Leda did not, a fact which initiates her conflict with them—with the whole of society, in fact—as everyone seems to prefer women who are selfless, even self-effacing. Clio herself likes Amy precisely because she is so bubbly and agreeable. Even Clio’s friends get offended or become deeply uneasy when she tells the truth about a fellow influencer’s deal with a company that makes terrible products. Women are supposed to be “nice,” and Clio isn’t always.


The key to her dynamism is Clio’s discovery of some difficult family truths— findings that lead her to question how much Alexandra deserved to become the family scapegoat, how truthful James and Amy were about their relationship, how reliable James’s integrity is in general, and how many lies she was told as a child. Realizing that James cheated on Alex with Amy before the marriage was over and that the house at 6 Edgewood is, indeed, possessed by a demon are the most eye-opening revelations. They lead to the discovery of her sisters’ lies about the source of Clio’s burn scar, causing the tensions just beneath the surface of those relationships to burst, just as the blister on her new burn does when she realizes James believes her to be “psychotic,” just as he said Alex was.


Clio understands that Alex made some unfortunate choices, but she is not the “madwoman” James made of her. Nor is he the steady but beleaguered man he’s made himself out to be. Developing a more nuanced view of her parents helps Clio to see their weaknesses and strengths, and this allows her to embrace her own. Ultimately, she says, “I know now that my heart is a soft thing. What’s the point in pretending it isn’t?” (316). She is able to embrace her vulnerability without fear, and her newfound authenticity improves both her personal and professional lives.

Alexandra Barnes

Alexandra is the mother of Clio and her sisters and James’s ex-wife. When Alexandra fought against her husband, holding him accountable for his infidelity, he insisted that she was “crazy.” He weaponized her dependence on alcohol and emotional vulnerability in the wake of their separation to depict her as an unfit mother and gain full custody of their daughters. She acted out of love, but was often exhausted by James’s spite, his social power, and her own substance dependency and emotional overwhelm.


Likewise, when she tried to oppose the demon, it resulted in James developing more ammunition to use against her in court, often by presenting her as emotionally and mentally unstable. In short, fighting the demon got her nowhere. At some point, she must have realized this, as she settled for keeping the demon’s activity “dormant” rather than eradicating it from her and her daughters’ lives. Nonetheless, the stress took a toll on her, leading to recurring alcohol abuse and physiological symptoms such as a weakened heart.


Alexandra was a feminist, though she never used that word. She played her young daughters the music of female musicians so they would know that they could become rock stars, or whatever else they wanted. She talked to them about female “selfishness” and how society paints it as a bad thing when a woman wants to be something other than a wife and mother. She even tried to protect them from the demon, though she knew it would give James more information to use against her. Ultimately, Alexandra’s refusal to pacify James—a stand-in for patriarchal society’s expectations of women in general—as well as her refusal to give the demon whatever it wants (constant access to her, continued access to her children, and more entertainment in the form of their pain), teaches Clio how to navigate similarly treacherous relationships.


After escaping the demon, Clio says, “I will not fight against [the demon] or try to appease it. Those efforts are futile. My mother taught me that. I accept that it exists” (317). Clio and James have exchanged apologies by the novel’s end, but she will no longer adapt her behavior to make him feel important or needed. Neither will she continue to soothe the demon; she gave it her necklace to escape, but she will not “play nice” either with it or her father anymore. Alexandra died “playing nice,” which took strength and sacrifice on her part, and this example gives Clio the insight she needs to make a different choice.

Daphne Barnes

Daphne is the middle Barnes sister, the mediator and peacekeeper, and a lesbian in full awareness of her father’s unspoken disapproval. Clio describes her as “a shape-shifter, a side effect of being the middle child. She adapts to the circumstances, fits into whatever space she’s allotted; the queen of appeasing” (5). When Clio admits that she broke her promise not to read Alexandra’s book, it is Daphne who openly expresses her disappointment. In fact, Daphne is the only one of the sisters to keep that promise.


Daphne longs for James’s approval, especially because she’s aware of his disappointment that she’s not straight, but she also longs to live authentically and be true to herself. In other words, she struggles between being the socially acceptable, likeable woman, and a fully liberated, socially threatening woman. This dynamic is captured by Clio’s statement, “Daphne thinks she’s the most progressive in the family, but she got awfully judgmental when I told her I was considering starting an OnlyFans” (12). Daphne is torn between her two sides, made ambivalent by the example her parents set.


Daphne learned from her mother that loud, difficult women can be unpleasant and are often punished by society for their failure to embody an ideal. Life with Alexandra was usually uncomfortable, difficult, and scary for Daphne. Life with James was more stable and predictable, but only if she and her sisters acted like Amy rather than Alex. Neither one was fully emotionally satisfying.


Later, when her sisters recapitulate this dynamic—Leda taking on the expected role of wife, one who dislikes other women for behaving “selfishly,” and Clio acting as a dangerous woman who stands up to male authority—Daphne admits to loving and hating them both. She hates that her mother “messed [her] up” and that “Dad cheated on Mom with Amy” (302, 303); she hates that Alexandra never got better, never chose differently, and that James “hates that [she’s] gay but will never admit it” (303). At the same time, she loves all of them. Her paradoxical feelings illustrate the dangers of a society that insists on a female (heteronormative) ideal; there is literally no identity that Daphne can embody and feel comfortable in at the same time.

Leda Barnes

Leda is the controlling oldest sister, the one who remembers Alexandra the best, who experienced the most verbal abuse and criticism from her mother, and the only other person to be aware that the demon was real because she saw it. Clio describes her as “a chronic overachiever with an iron will [who] could probably stop the earth on its axis if she put her mind to it” (13). Leda is deeply insecure, in part as a result of Alexandra’s abusive comments, and in part because Clio is the sister who always seems to get all the attention. Leda even admits that, when the demon couldn’t wake Clio when they were children, it would come to Leda and Daphne’s room. Leda tried to treat the monster as a bully, ignoring it until it went away. However, once it stopped coming to her bedside, she missed the attention it gave her.


Leda is the reliable one, the one with a stable relationship and life, the sister who can be depended on in a crisis. She is prepared to take the lead on the house before Clio claims it. She is the one Aunt Helen called to break the news of Alexandra’s death. As Clio says, “Leda and Helen are cut from the same glorious rigid bitch cloth” (13). While she isn’t particularly likable as a person, she has—at least—followed the path that James believes is most conducive to happiness, and this makes her likable enough in his eyes. She does love her husband; they all do. Her unlikable qualities are offset by Tommy’s overwhelming Likability, balancing them out.


However, this dynamic also provides evidence of how she was impacted by their parents’ choices. Leda doesn’t want to be like Alexandra, but she is deeply bitter and angry, which adds to her unlikability nonetheless. It is notable, however, that Clio credits both her sisters with “saving” her when James would’ve allowed her to go down the same path Alex did.

James Barnes

James is the father of Clio and her sisters and Alexandra’s ex-husband. Clio initially describes James as “Steady and reliable, the captain of the ship, the benevolent king of our lives, his love as sure and powerful as gravity” (10). However, as she learns more about his lies, infidelity, deception, intentional mischaracterization of Alexandra, and his attempt to erase her from their daughters’ lives, Clio’s perspective changes. In one particularly revealing confrontation, he admits that he cheated on Alex—as their mother claimed and he always denied—before throwing a chair against the wall, a violent action that shocks Amy and his daughters.


As part of his campaign against Alex to get custody of the girls, James routinely presented her as out of control, emotionally and mentally. Thus, he always had to appear as Clio initially describes him. He only lost control when Alex pushed him, confronted him, or called him out on his bad behavior; likewise, he only loses control when Clio pushes him and confronts him with his bad behavior, revealing his desire to dominate others. He steals her book, then blames her for the fight that ensues when he destroys it. He lied about the nature and extent of Alex’s abuse to make her look worse. To this end, Clio says, “I understand that the demon exploited my mother’s vulnerabilities, weaponized them against her. Her sadness, her addiction [….]. It is not alone in that behavior. It is not special. It is one of many. My father taught me that” (317). James and the demon’s behavior echo one another in myriad ways.


James is a static character because he doesn’t change; it’s just that his real self, his whole self, is revealed as Clio gets closer to the messy truth of her parents’ relationship. In fact, he stands in for the novel’s real antagonist—society—rewarding women, like Amy, who are likable and compliant, and punishing women, like Alex and even Clio, who are confrontational and threatening. Clio wishes she’d seen his whole self sooner and says, “I’m sorry for the part he played in Mom’s destruction […]. I will never know his motivation […]—if he was intentionally antagonizing our mother because it benefited him […]. Or maybe he didn’t want to hurt her, but he was just fine watching her hurt herself” (320). Just as the demon enjoyed watching Clio hurt herself, James capitalized on Alexandra’s self-destructive tendencies, and he would have gone on to protect himself and his power by punishing Clio. Eliminating “difficult” women from his life is his pattern.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock analysis of every major character

Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.

  • Explore in-depth profiles for every important character
  • Trace character arcs, turning points, and relationships
  • Connect characters to key themes and plot points