Read People Like A Book: How to Analyze, Understand, and Predict People's Emotions, Thoughts, Intentions, and Behaviors

Patrick King

33 pages 1-hour read

Patrick King

Read People Like A Book: How to Analyze, Understand, and Predict People's Emotions, Thoughts, Intentions, and Behaviors

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 2-3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 2 Summary & Analysis: “The Body, The Face, and Clusters”

People can actively convey a certain message using words and “macroexpressions,” or noticeable facial expressions that last for at least four seconds. According to psychologist Paul Ekman, what people cannot control are “microexpressions”—tiny, fleeting facial expressions—which seem to be a human universal. Microexpressions are physiological reflexes that reflect people’s inner emotions; they may look just like macroexpressions but are much faster. Learning to notice microexpressions will help readers accurately read others. By paying close attention to people’s faces as they speak, one will notice if there is a discrepancy between what they are saying and their expressions. 


For example, being fidgety, avoiding eye contact, and scratching one’s nose seem to be signs of deceit. Evaluating body language is never fool-proof but offers some additional information. Moreover, body language is strongly influenced by physiological responses. King claims that “nonverbal communication is inbuilt, biological, and the result of evolution” (95). While people can try to control their bodies, their movements tend to display their true feelings. King cites scholarly research that suggests that certain gestures, like shrugging, are shared across cultures. The brain’s most primal system, the limbic system, controls movements like flight, fight, and freeze, and these fear responses are still easily observable in modern life, even in scenarios in which people’s physical survival is not necessarily at risk. 


The author lists numerous anxious behaviors such as fiddling with necklaces or ties, touching one’s forehead, or wringing one’s hands. Self-soothing gestures like touching one’s hair or massaging one’s ears reveal inner discomfort, while large exhales and self-hugging are tell-tale signs of stress. Subconsciously, people want to protect their torso, a crucial part of the body. Closed body language, in which limbs are locked or turned away, suggests negative feelings, while open and relaxed body language suggests positive feelings or confidence. King feels that this aspect of “reading people” is intuitive since everyone is inherently “fluent” in others’ actions; they just need to remember to deemphasize the verbal and pay attention to body language in detail. However, spotting lies can be difficult since the signs of lying are the same as anxiety and discomfort in general.


When assessing others, King coaches the reader to focus on behavior that deviates from a baseline and to consider a broad range of evidence. He advises to “Look for Mirroring” since people who like and agree with a person tend to mimic them (117). People’s energy is also important; their focus reveals their true interest. He reminds the reader of the dynamic nature of body language and urges them to observe the flow of gestures rather than a single tell, putting each observation in context. King argues that voice is another element of body language and that breathing, tone, and pitch hugely influence people’s communication. King concludes by reminding the reader to assess “clusters” of body language and facial expressions.


King offers a thorough assessment of facial expressions, body language, and tone of voice, grounding much of his discussion in terms of evolutionary psychology. However, King’s focus on body language largely assumes a Western lens. For instance, a previous chapter mentioned that eye contact is encouraged in America but more taboo in Japan; nevertheless, King here uses it in several examples. The variability of facial expressions both within and across cultures has led scholars such as neuroscientist Lisa Feldman Barrett (known for works like How Emotions Are Made) to argue that “reading” others’ emotions is much more difficult than most people believe (Sarwari, Khalida. “Northeastern University Professor Says We Can’t Gauge Emotions from Facial Expressions Alone.” Northeastern Global News, 19 Jul. 2019). 


Chapter Lessons

  • People can fake macroexpressions but reveal their true feelings through microexpressions.
  • Anxious body language can signal nervousness or lying.
  • Always know how people typically behave before assessing their facial expressions and body language.
  • Evaluate expressions, body movements, and voice comprehensively, looking for clusters of signs rather than single “tells.”


Reflection Questions

  • Why does King believe body language is as powerful as verbal language? Do you agree?
  • If there are no single tells that indicate lying, how can you assess whether someone is truthful or not? How would you apply this knowledge in your life?
  • Whom would you like to understand better? How could you use these body language tips to gain insight into their moods or intentions?

Chapter 3 Summary & Analysis: “Personality Science and Typology”

King defines personality as a “persistent pattern of behavior” (133). Just like assessing body language or expressions, establishing a “baseline” of someone’s typical personality helps to assess their actions more accurately. For instance, if someone is rarely happy or agreeable to anyone, their negative body language toward one’s latest work idea may not be very meaningful. People’s personalities can also come across differently depending on mood and context.


One of the most respected understandings of personality within the psychology profession is the “Big 5” theory, which recognizes five main personality traits: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Rather than lumping people into one category or another, this system scores people on a spectrum and therefore captures nuances in personality. The five dimensions that it measures are easily remembered using the acronym OCEAN.


Another popular personality model is the Myers-Briggs approach. While psychologists tend not to rely on this model—which does not have a basis in scholarly research—it has remained popular with laypeople and workplaces. This model judges people’s behaviors along four axes—extrovert or introvert, intuiting or thinking, sensing or feeling, and perceiving or judging—creating sixteen possible personalities. The binary nature of each category means that the resulting labels can lack nuance, but they may give one a general sense of someone’s core traits.


King summarizes another approach: Keirsey’s “four temperaments”: “guardians” are concrete, organized, and make contributions to others, “artisans” are flexible and crave stimulation, “idealists” are intuitive, helpful, and seek meaning, and “rationalists” are organized, objective, and strategic. Like most personality models, this is not comprehensive or detailed but provides a starting point for engaging with someone. For instance, if a reader thinks someone is an idealist, they might compliment them on their kindness and their efforts to help others.


King offers the reader a final model of personality, the Enneagram. While there is some peer-reviewed evidence to support this model’s accuracy, its non-scholarly origins from a spiritual teacher mean that psychologists have largely dismissed it. Nevertheless, many business management programs use it. There are nine Enneagrams, which capture people’s personalities in broad strokes. For instance, the reformer aims to do good for others and is organized, with high standards for themselves and others. King concludes by reminding the reader that each model provides a broad way to categorize others and understand their traits and motivations.


Though it includes three theories of personality that are not backed by science, King’s discussion of personality typing reflects the widespread popularity of tests like the Myers-Briggs Inventory in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. The surge in interest is partly attributable to corporate adoption of these models for team-building and other purposes (Hunt, Elle. “What personality Are You? How the Myers-Briggs Test Took Over the World.” The Guardian, 30 Aug. 2021). Personality typing also resonates with contemporary Western cultures’ emphasis on self-discovery and individual identity, further contributing to its appeal.


Chapter Lessons

  • There are many theories of personality, and no one model will perfectly label people.
  • The most reliable system of personality typing is the “Big Five.”
  • Use your understanding of personality to understand others’ preferences and motivations.
  • Get to know people in different contexts before judging their personality traits.


Reflection Questions

  • Which model of personality seems the most useful to you? Why?
  • King claims it is important to interact with people in different situations before judging their personalities. Think of someone you’d like to “read” better. What kind of situations have you seen them in? How could you interact with them in a new way to get to know them better?
  • How might your own personality affect how you perceive and engage with others?
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 33 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs