The Apothecary

Maile Meloy

50 pages 1-hour read

Maile Meloy

The Apothecary

Fiction | Novel | Middle Grade | Published in 2011

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Coexistence of Science and Magic

Within The Apothecary’s world of magical realism, mysticism and folklore exist alongside real-world places, circumstances, and concerns. The looming nuclear threat of the Cold War with Russia grows even as Benjamin and Janie learn about the existence of the Pharmacopoeia and the apothecary’s hidden world of magical, healing remedies. In the novel, much more is possible for the characters than people in the reader’s world generally consider, and science is responsible for most of those possibilities.


Janie accepts such possibilities more readily than Benjamin does, largely because she “allow[s] for [them]” (71), as the gardener instructs. Benjamin relies on what he has learned about the natural world in school rather than the information contained in the Pharmacopoeia. Of the recipe for the avian elixir, he says, “There are physical laws—the conservation of mass, for one thing. A human being can’t just become a tiny bird-sized thing. We’d have to become something the size of us. Like a baby ostrich” (107). However, given that individuals turn into birds with similar personalities and characteristics, their transformations follow a kind of logic. When they use the invisibility serum, Janie realizes that “no one expects to see a finger or a paper clip floating down the hall, so no one does” (168). This explains why people in the novel don’t balk at seeing the disembodied pieces of children and suggests that the reader’s world might be more magical than they realize: When one doesn’t expect magic to exist, one simply doesn’t see evidence of it.


Janie and Benjamin learn that what seems like “magic” is actually just science. When Danby tells Sakharov about Burrows’s work, he says, “He’s—a kind of alchemist. Or a magician,” to which Janie responds, “No, he’s a scientist […] just like you are” (315). Her correction highlights the link between science and the things that seem improbable, like creating a net composed of reactive polymers and the Quintessence to contain and absorb the radiation from a bomb detonation. Furthermore, Burrows describes the Quintessence as the fifth element and the “source of all life. A life force to combat a killing force” (212). This explanation builds on the scientifically known four elements: water, air, fire, and earth. In addition, following Newton’s third law—which proposes an equal and opposite reaction for every action—Count Vili explains, “Whenever we tamper with natural laws, there are consequences […] The larger the disruption, the larger the consequence” (286). In short, the principles of science still apply to the events or inventions that seem magical in nature.

The Intelligence of Children

Adults often underestimate children and thus overlook their talents and capabilities. However, most of the characters in the text seem to hold children’s aptitudes and talents in high regard, and their trust allows the children to behave more independently and to be more helpful than they might otherwise be.


The differences between characters who respect the children’s intelligence and those who don’t affect their outcomes. Danby is the one major character who often underrates Benjamin and Janie’s intelligence, and the text portrays him as not easy to identify with or like. He’s a traitor to his country and welcomes the Soviets’ development of nuclear weaponry. Though he almost succeeds in fooling the children, they catch on to his true nature: “It took about a second and a half to register what the smiling, scarred face of the driver meant. It meant that we weren’t going to have cocoa, and that Danby was not our friend” (131). Shiskin, conversely, correctly values the children’s capacities, and he nearly escapes their questioning as a result. Shiskin never doubts Benjamin and Janie’s ability to manipulate and deceive, just like adults do. To his son, Sergei, he says, “They are not your friends […] They invent this [science team ruse] to get to me” (84). Ultimately, Shiskin survives the ordeal with the Soviet bomb and moves to Florida with his family. People who don’t underestimate children’s intelligence fare better than those who do.


The children’s ideas help the adults stop the Soviets’ destruction, proving that children are just as (if not more) intelligent than their older counterparts. On his deathbed, the gardener even tells Benjamin, “You have to find your father. Whatever his plan is, he’s going to need you” (74). In the reader’s world, it’s unlikely that most adults would believe that capable adults require the assistance of children, but this is precisely what the gardener claims. Janie has the idea to make the invisibility serum to access the hidden bunker where they locate Jin Lo. Pip figures out how to use the serum before boarding the ship, and when he’s unable to use it, he exploits his visibility to trick the adults and distract them from Benjamin and Janie. Over and over, the children prove to be more capable than the adults around them.

The Power of Loyalty

The novel’s events demonstrate how powerful loyalty is, especially loyalty to one’s friends and one’s principles. Were it not for their loyalty, many of the characters’ fates could have turned out quite differently.


The children routinely exhibit unwavering loyalty to one another, and this loyalty permits their success and survival. Although she just met Pip, Janie endangers herself to save him while they’re birds. When a cat snatches the tiny Pip, she says, “I grabbed the cat’s soft ear with my talons just as she took Pip’s neck in her sharp white teeth. I squeezed her ear, and her yowl of pain turned to one of surprise as Pip started to grow, right under her claws” (149). The attack could have killed Janie; instead, it buys Pip enough time to resume his human shape so that the cat no longer poses a threat. When Shiskin threatens Janie with a gun on the ship, she fears that “Benjamin might kill Shiskin with his bare hands” (279). Later, Janie refuses to abandon Benjamin and save herself, thinking, “At least we would die together” (324), and Hirra then saves them both. Benjamin and Janie continually display incredible loyalty to one another, and they both survive as a result.


Loyalty to others sometimes looks confusingly like betrayal, but its power is nonetheless evident. It compels Benjamin and Janie to keep Shiskin safe—even when he betrays the group to save his family—because they promised Sergei; then, because loyalty to family provided Shiskin’s motivation, they don’t kill him to protect themselves. The group understands why he places his family’s safety above every other consideration. Likewise, when Benjamin returns Janie’s diary to her, she doesn’t dwell on the fact that he stole her memory without her consent. Instead, she thinks, “I knew without question that Benjamin was out there somewhere with his father, looking out for us, risking his life to keep the world safe” (353). Benjamin’s loyalty to his principles and to her, and his resulting desire to protect her, is admirable and powerful.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence