Select one of the civilizations that Huntington regards as distinct and important, such as Western, Islamic, or Sinic civilization. How does he characterize this civilization? In what ways is his portrait accurate or inaccurate?

Compare and contrast Huntington’s civilizational paradigm with Francis Fukuyama’s theory of the “end of history.” How are the two theorists different or similar in their views and conceptions of civilization?

How is Huntington’s theory of intra-civilizational diversity and conflict received by contemporary political theorists? In what ways has his theory been challenged or adapted in recent analysis?

How does Huntington explore the nature of power and leadership within civilizations? What does his analysis suggest about what makes for effective or ineffective leadership?

Analyze if, and how, Huntington’s framework allows for meaningful change, hybrid identities, and/or cross-cultural alliances. Where do these elements fit into his theories? Are there other factors his analysis may have overlooked or failed to fully integrate?

Discuss Huntington’s views on Western universalism. What arguments, if any, could be made in favor of universalism? To what extent, if any, could universalism be considered a form of neocolonialism?

Compare and contrast The Clash of Civilizations with another one of Huntington’s works, such as The Third Wave (1991) or Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity (2004). What key themes and ideas do the works share? In what ways have Huntington’s theories developed, or remained consistent, across these works?

Consider whether Huntington’s predictions about the Sinic-Western confrontation have materialized. How does he frame the relationship between China and the West? What are the strengths and limitations of his assessment? What are the long-term implications for global order?