The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race

Gather initial thoughts and broad opinions about the book.

1. What impact did Isaacson’s storytelling approach have on your understanding of scientific discovery? Like his previous work Steve Jobs, this book presents the development of CRISPR as a thrilling competition between brilliant minds rather than dry academic research. How does this narrative style change your perception of how groundbreaking science actually happens?

2. Which aspects of Doudna’s journey from curious child in Hawaii to Nobel Prize winner did you find most compelling or surprising?

3. Considering the book’s dual focus on Doudna’s personal story and the broader implications of gene editing, did you feel Isaacson struck the right balance between biography and scientific exploration?

Encourage readers to connect the book’s themes and characters with their personal experiences.

1. How do you view the competitive nature that drives scientists like Doudna, Zhang, and Lander? The book suggests that ambition and the desire for recognition are natural and even beneficial forces in scientific discovery. Do you see similar competitive dynamics in your own professional or academic experiences?

2. If you could undergo genetic editing to eliminate your risk for a specific disease, would you choose to do so?

3. What childhood experiences or influences shaped your current interests and career path? Doudna’s fascination with the sensitive plant in Hawaii and her father’s gift of The Double Helix by James Watson proved pivotal to her scientific journey. Can you identify similar formative moments or objects in your own life?

4. How comfortable are you with the idea that future parents might edit their children’s genes for enhanced intelligence, athletic ability, or physical appearance?

5. Doudna credits several mentors, from her graduate advisor Jack Szostak to the inspiring example of Rosalind Franklin, with shaping her career. Who have been the most influential mentors or role models in your life, and how did they guide your development?

6. The book explores how scientists must balance the thrill of discovery with concerns about potential misuse of their work. Have you ever faced situations where you had to weigh the benefits of pursuing a goal against possible negative consequences?

Encourage readers to connect the book’s themes and characters with their personal experiences.

1. How might widespread access to genetic enhancement technologies reshape social inequality? Isaacson and several scientists worry that expensive gene editing could create a world where wealthy families buy genetic advantages for their children, while others cannot afford such improvements.

2. The book highlights the complex relationship between government funding, university research, and private enterprise in driving scientific innovation. Based on what you read about institutions like Berkeley, the Broad Institute, and companies like Genentech, which model do you think best serves the public interest?

3. Consider how attitudes toward genetic modification have evolved since the book’s publication in 2021. Do you think society is becoming more accepting of gene editing technologies? What factors might be driving these changing perspectives?

Dive into the book’s structure, characters, themes, and symbolism.

1. Isaacson presents the CRISPR story as a race between competing labs, complete with chapter titles like “The Race” and “Photo Finish.” Does the racing metaphor accurately capture the collaborative yet competitive nature of modern research? How does it affect your understanding of how scientific breakthroughs actually occur?

2. How does the author handle the ethical complexities surrounding He Jiankui’s creation of the world’s first gene-edited babies?

3. What role do unsung heroes like Francisco Mojica, Virginijus Šikšnys, and Rosalind Franklin play in Isaacson’s narrative? These scientists made crucial contributions but received less recognition than figures like Doudna and Zhang. How does their inclusion affect the book’s larger message about scientific discovery?

4. Throughout the text, Isaacson draws parallels between the biotech revolution and the digital revolution. How effectively does this comparison work, and what does it suggest about the future relationship between technology and humanity?

5. The recurring motif of viruses and bacteria appears throughout the book, from the ancient battle that inspired CRISPR to the COVID-19 pandemic response. How do these microscopic organisms function symbolically in Isaacson’s narrative about human ambition and scientific progress?

6. How does Isaacson navigate the challenge of writing about a living scientist while maintaining objectivity? The author acknowledges that his account relies heavily on Doudna’s perspective, and he clearly admires her work and character.

Encourage imaginative and creative connections to the book.

1. Imagine you’re designing an ethical framework for regulating genetic enhancement technologies. Based on the debates presented in the book, what principles would guide your approach to distinguishing between acceptable medical treatments and questionable enhancements?

2. If you could step into the shoes of any scientist featured in the book during a pivotal part of the CRISPR story, whose perspective would you choose and why? Consider moments like Charpentier’s discovery of tracrRNA, Zhang’s secretive work on human cells, or Doudna’s reaction to He Jiankui’s announcement in Hong Kong.

3. Picture yourself as a science advisor to world leaders creating international guidelines for gene editing research. What specific policies would you recommend to balance the potential benefits of genetic technologies with concerns about safety, ethics, and equality?

Need more conversation starters? Inspire your group with our Discussion Questions tool.