67 pages • 2-hour read
Ichiro Kishimi, Fumitake KogaA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of mental illness.
The authors use the philosopher and the youth’s discussion of love to convey the importance of building lasting connection with others. The philosopher argues that love isn’t something that happens to people but an experience that people must build and work toward together. He contests the notion of falling into love, which implies a lack of agency. Real human love is different from divine love, which is a concept, and animal love, which is an instinct.
After exploring the intersection between divine, animal, and human love, the authors posit that true, balanced love is an art form. The philosopher uses an example to teach the youth the difference between lust and love. The individual may greatly desire an object the same way they desire another person; this connection is based solely on desire and not on deep understanding. The individual must practice love in an active way to achieve true connection. Love is not easy, but it is possible to create love with care and intention.
The authors argue in support of Adler’s claim that love can exist between any assortment of individuals. The youth takes issue with this notion, insisting that the individual cannot fall in love with anyone. The philosopher counters that if love is work, the individual can work to love anyone. Love allows a community to function and is an essential task each community member must respect if the community is to remain healthy and sustainable. Overall, the argumentation in this chapter extends the earlier claim that it is possible (and desirable) to befriend anyone, though this potentially oversimplifies the complexities of doing so in environments that are strongly hierarchical in structure (for example, many workplaces).
The authors posit that if an individual chooses happiness, they will be better able to serve their community. The philosopher holds that the individual’s happiness can positively influence those around them. If the individual is happy, they will feel useful to others in turn. This voluntary happiness originates from the individual’s choice to love others. Love creates happiness, and happiness fuels selfless connection.
The authors uphold Adler’s notions of self-reliance, maintaining that letting go of one’s selfish desires and devoting oneself to personal growth are the best ways to pursue happiness and love. The philosopher explains Adler’s idea of “pampered children” to the youth; such individuals behave like children and use emotional outbursts to manipulate others and get their way. Only when the individual becomes more self-reliant can they achieve and participate in community feeling.
The chapter’s emphasis on transcending selfish desires echoes several philosophical and psychological traditions. Given the work’s Japanese cultural context, Buddhism’s teachings about the problematic nature of selfish attachment to oneself, one’s goals, etc., are particularly relevant. However, The Courage to Be Happy does so in the service of individual growth, not self-transcendence per se—a tension common in works of personal development that draw on Buddhist ideas.
According to Adler, becoming self-reliant is the first step toward learning and practicing the art of love. The philosopher explores how children’s self-regard evolves as they develop into adults. In the early developmental stages, children are not self-reliant because they must rely on others for their survival. As they grow up, they learn about the world and themselves and must orient themselves away from others and take initiative for their lives. If the individual continues to regard themselves as someone else’s child for the rest of their lives, they preclude their own development. This emphasis on self-reliance as an internal state renders the book’s arguments broadly applicable—one can be self-reliant yet still depend on others to meet various physical needs—though it may not be equally accessible to people with certain mental illnesses, developmental disorders, or other neuropsychiatric conditions.
After examining the relationship between birth order and family life, the authors maintain Adler’s notion that loving oneself is the first step to loving others. The philosopher asks the youth about his upbringing and his relationships with his parents and brother. He suggests that the youth still doesn’t love himself, which is why he still longs for approval from his family members and his students. If the individual is confident in themselves, they will not need others’ approval to feel or show love. While this message empowers readers to take responsibility for their relationships, it may understate the extent to which humans are “wired” to seek one another’s approval.
The authors hold that loving others requires confidence in oneself and in others. The philosopher explains to the youth that self-love is only possible if the individual respects and has confidence in themselves. He urges the youth toward this perspective. The individual cannot wait for others to show them love without first practicing self-love.
The authors argue that soul mates do not exist and that a person can love anyone they encounter in their life. If the individual devotes themselves to any one of their relationships, these connections can blossom into deep and lasting affection. The philosopher upholds this notion, but the youth takes issue with the idea that destiny is unrelated to romantic connection.
The authors compare love to a fluid dance, arguing that love requires effort and care from all participants. The philosopher uses his own marriage as an example. He reiterates Adler’s point that love requires work, practice, and care. Adler also used the metaphor of the dance to describe love as collaborative work. Love is beautiful but does not come about without investment.
The chapter’s (and section’s) emphasis on love as an action reflects broader 21st-century trends in the self-help genre; for instance, Yung Pueblo’s How to Love Better frames love similarly while also insisting that healthy relationships require self-love. Thus, what distinguishes The Courage to Be Happy is its contextualization of this idea within Adler’s comprehensive psychological/philosophical framework.
Love and happiness, according to the authors, are inextricable. The philosopher argues that if a person wants to feel love, they should show love to others; if a person wants to be happy, they should engage happily in their life. The youth initially challenges these ideas but accepts that loving others, self-reliance, and enjoying life are essential aspects of achieving contentment.
The authors maintain Adler’s notion that life is made up of banal days within which the individual can still find happiness. The philosopher reiterates to the youth the importance of remaining open in all aspects of life. If the individual is open to love and beauty and shows respect and concern for others, their life will be rich.
The philosopher and youth reflect on all that they talked about. The youth is unsure what to do next, as he feels his perspective has changed. The philosopher reminds him to live in and to appreciate the present moment. Focusing on the present can help the individual feel hopeful and experience contentment. This emphasis on presence is common in late 20th and early 21st-century self-help literature (for example, Eckhart Tolle’s The Power of Now) and often draws on Buddhist teachings. In The Courage to Be Happy, however, it is merely one part of a broader philosophical framework.



Unlock all 67 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.