63 pages 2-hour read

The Dream Hotel

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Content Warning: This section contains discussions of child death, gender discrimination, racism, and physical and emotional abuse.

Sara Hussein

Sara Hussein is the protagonist and primary point-of-view character in the novel. She is a 38-year-old museum archivist and historian, with a specialty in postcolonial Africa, but as of the novel’s opening, she has been detained for 10 months in a Californian facility called Madison due to having a high “risk” score. Sara is intelligent, thoughtful, and meticulous, with a deep understanding of psychology and a desire to see other people as their best selves, even if she fails from time to time in doing so out of a competing desire to escape from Madison as quickly as possible. Sara’s compliance and capabilities are often reflected in her physical appearance; when she is trying to fit Madison’s standards, she obeys their rules regarding her physical appearance, but when Madison’s own standards begin to break down, she breaks down with them, as in the scene where she is forced to take off her pants because they refuse to allow her to use the restroom until she soils herself.


Much of Sara’s characterization within her own mind comes from her role as a wife and mother; her separation from her family is hard on her and forces her to be vulnerable with her own identity as an independent person, despite the dual pressures of Madison and Safe-X forcing her to conform. Much of Sara’s internal life dwells on her grief over her brother’s death when she was a child and her struggles with being a new mother. Sara’s initial resistance to being a mother contrasts with her love for her children, just as her resentment of her husband contrasts with her intense love for him. In this way, the novel makes it clear that people are not cut and dry—Sara cannot be reduced to one or the other, and the algorithm’s single-minded interpretation of her exhaustion and resentment of Elias as a desire to kill him contrasts with her complexities as a person. Sara grows from a compliant, self-focused person into a person who understands the value of others and the need for unity in the face of authoritarianism, yet at the end of the novel, she still separates herself from Madison to return to her family and some semblance of a normal life. While in some ways this is a betrayal of her “cause,” it is consistent with her characterization from the very first page; she restates throughout that she will comply with nearly anything if even just seeing her family is on the line. At the same time, Sara’s choice to live her life freely by reconnecting with Toya—despite the potential risks in doing so—demonstrate that she has been irreparably changed by her experiences in retention. Sara cannot return to the person she was before being retained, and she returns to Toya as a sign of this internal change, since Toya is familiar in a way her family can no longer be.

Elias, Mohsin, and Mona

Elias, Mohsin, and Mona represent Sara’s family unit, although only Elias has distinct characterization. Mohsin and Mona are extensions of Elias and Sara’s relationship, and are too young to have distinct personalities, functioning more as symbols of Sara’s desire for freedom and love. Mohsin and Mona are typical toddlers, and their separation from their mother makes them distant and distracted from her, which hurts her emotionally. Elias is characterized as reckless and passionate, but also practical and withdrawn; his complexities feed into Sara’s own and create conflict between them and with the overarching threat of Madison and Safe-X as a whole. Elias believes that Sara can get out of retention by following the rules and is not always compassionate about how difficult her life has been and how complex the system that entangles her is. His lack of experience with the bias that she faces characterizes him as fundamentally incapable of fully grasping her experiences, although he can help comfort her and support her through them.


The novel is often deliberately vague about Elias’s life and experiences, since Sara does not know what he does while she is in retention. While his feelings and responses are often understandable, if not justifiable, Sara’s perspective as the narrator and protagonist often casts him in a negative light. In many ways, Elias is Sara’s foil; his perspective is uninformed and limited based on his individual experiences, yet he goes through his own traumas during their separation. While the narrative implies their marriage begins to recover after she returns home, by the end of the last chapter, he is never named—simply referred to as “her husband.” This represents Sara’s faded connection with him as a person and his reduction to a role in her life, something he will have to fight his way out of if he wants to regain the intimacy they once had.

Hinton

Hinton is one of the primary antagonists of the work and occupies a complex role as Sara’s personal tormentor and yet the object of her unwelcome sexual desire. As the Senior Attendant, he is second-in-command at Madison and has immense power over all the retainees, which he utilizes to torment them when they do not follow his commands. Hinton is cruel and manipulative, but ultimately bland; he derives his personality from the power he wields and is uninteresting without it. This is reflective in his appearance, which Sara describes as blandly attractive except for the burn scar on his neck, which gives his otherwise boring face some interest.


While he harms all of the women, even sexualizing them through jokes in staff meetings, Hinton has a specific vendetta against Sara for her intelligence and capacity to resist, and targets her more than the other women—forcing her to layer on shirts as punishment for taking off her clothes, sexually harassing her, and stealing her belongings, going so far as to read her dream journal with no intention of returning it to her. Despite his abuses of his power, he largely goes unpunished through the end of the novel. Sara briefly threatens to report him for neglecting his duty during the wildfire, but this never actualizes, and he ends the novel telling her he hoped she had a pleasant stay. Hinton is a flat character as a result. He represents the sorts of people who are attracted to having power over others—even if Hinton were to leave, another Hinton would take his place. Sara’s sexual attraction to him represents her desire to comply with the system at the cost of her own dignity, and her rejection of Hinton by the end of the novel—even rejecting her own dream journal in favor of her strike—represents her acceptance that compliance can only lead to dehumanization.

The Madison Chief Retention Officer

The Madison CRO is the major antagonist of the work, even though his impact is far less direct and personal than Hinton’s. The CRO is an unnamed man, with his name blacked out in all the official documents, and his appearance is similarly disguised: “she still doesn’t know what he looks like, his face being shielded by a surgical mask” (270). Like Hinton, the CRO is a faceless representation of corporate greed and rejection of humanity, which is best represented through his distance from the actual retention center—despite his job as the chief officer, he primarily works offsite, finding new ways to make money for the company and use the women as tools rather than people. Through his actions, he is characterized as greedy, inhumane, and willing to shift the blame off himself onto his employees for his own personal gain.


The CRO’s primary interests are Safe-X’s, not personal; it is implied that whatever benefits Safe-X also benefits him. He rebukes his own employees for mocking their workplace on social media (because it affects Safe-X’s image); he refuses to buy needed supplies and encourages the nurse to reject care for more women (because it saves Safe-X’s money); he projects an image of productivity and positivity through his announcements to the facility (because it protects Safe-X’s reputation). By the end of the novel, he personally attends Sara’s hearing to ensure she is freed because she has become a drain on his resources. Sara’s anger at him is justified, and his lack of response to her cursing demonstrates his inhumanity even further. Like Hinton, the CRO does not grow or change across the narrative. His character is fundamentally integral to the conflict within the book, but ultimately replaceable; anyone could be the CRO, and anyone could become him if given enough power.

The Women in Retention

The other women in retention—particularly Toya Jones, Lucy Everett, Marcela DeLeon, Victoria Aguilar, and Emily Robbins—all have distinct characteristics but function as a unit, with their different personalities exploring different facets of Sara’s thoughts and the truths about retention/imprisonment. Lucy and Marcela function as antagonists, while Toya, Victoria, and Emily are allies, but all five of the women are portrayed as complex individuals with unique needs and lives outside of retention. Sara’s understanding of them changes throughout the book, but few of them have individual arcs, instead responding to Sara and their environment as events progress.


Lucy represents the antagonism between the women, as stirred up by Madison to keep them from unifying. Lucy is older and no-nonsense; she was an accounting clerk for a real estate company before her imprisonment. She gets released early in the novel, and Marcela accuses her of having a history or predilection for pedophilia, although it is unclear how accurate this is. Marcela’s anger at Lucy throughout the novel, and her repeated decision to reveal Lucy’s secrets and then fight her, proves that the women will find any reason to betray each other to justify their own feelings of innocence. Marcela’s treatment of Lucy does nothing to benefit Marcela except personally, and her cruelty ends up harming the other women by extension. Marcela is in her twenties and is a musician, a guitarist for an indie band. Marcela has a restraining order against her because she reported her neighbors’ unlicensed daycare, and they began reporting her for noise disturbances and trashing her yard, even cutting down her tree. They got footage of her retaliating by smashing their fence with a bat, and running a red light earned her a long stint in retention. Despite her projection of an image of resistance and rebellion, Marcela refuses to join Sara’s strike and ends up benefiting from the system as a result, earning her guitar as a privilege. Marcela represents the benefits and losses of compliance; while she gets her guitar, she loses her social circle, as Sara and the others slowly draw away from her to protect themselves.


The other three women are Sara’s friends; Emily is Sara’s roommate, a firefighter and aspiring comic book artist, while Toya becomes Sara’s closest ally and Victoria is the most active resister, becoming an icon of rebellion and human rights within the facility. Emily is kind, somewhat shy, but brave, while Toya is down-to-earth, stubborn, and loyal. Victoria is less present in the book throughout but is described as young and beautiful—even using her appearance to manipulate Officer Williams—and reveals herself to be cunning and insubordinate, willing to break the cameras and risk extended retention to give the women privacy. Emily and Toya both have recurrent medical issues that the retention center refuses to help them treat, and Victoria is eventually sexually harassed by Williams, which she is punished for since he has more power over her; all of their experiences unify them in the strike and represent the lack of human rights the women have as retainees. All three women represent the social circle Sara needs to resist the pressures of retention, since without their friendship and support, she is isolated and alone in her resistance.


Among these women, Victoria Aguilar stands out as a figure of unshaken resolve. Though she initially appears backgrounded, her quiet defiance becomes crucial as Sara’s resistance grows. Unlike others, Victoria never capitulates to the system’s manipulations. She engages in small acts of rebellion without needing permission or consensus. In this way, she emerges as a natural successor to Sara’s leadership by the novel’s end. Her youth and clarity of purpose suggest a continuity of resistance, hinting that the spirit of revolt outlives any one leader, even when that leader is abruptly removed.

Eisley Richardson/Julie Renstrom

Eisley, whose real name is Julie Renstrom, occupies a strange middle ground between the antagonism of Hinton and the CRO and the heroic, quiet resistance of Sara and her allies. Julie enters the retention center for scientific research purposes—experimenting on the retainees’ dreams using advertising to benefit Dreamsaver’s profits—but leaves changed, even though she is resistant to those changes. Julie is characterized initially as arrogant, closeminded, and self-assured, with little willingness to cooperate with the women or see their point of view, but her interior life is revealed to be isolated and lonely, with little support from her family or coworkers and a grief over her childhood friend that mirrors Sara’s own loss of her brother. While Julie’s story is never completed—she disappears from the narrative after a few emails, and the truth of her existence becomes a tool of Sara’s rebellion—it is implied she begins to feel guilt over how the women are treated and how much her profession refuses to see or treat them as people.


Julie’s lack of a definite arc, however, reflects her treatment of the other women. Julie argued with them over issues of healthcare and innocence/guilt, refusing to believe that systems can harm people and believing that if people simply make the right choices and prioritize the right things, they can all benefit. Julie most strongly represents the concept of privilege; she lives a privileged life, despite her own struggles, and cannot comprehend that other people have a systemic disadvantage. While Julie could grow from this experience and learn to value others and fight for them, her baby steps—giving money to Sara out of implied guilt—are so negligible that it is unclear whether she will have the clarity of mind to grow any further. Doing so would put everything she values at risk, and unlike the women in the retention center, she has a great deal of power and privilege to lose.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock analysis of every major character

Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.

  • Explore in-depth profiles for every important character
  • Trace character arcs, turning points, and relationships
  • Connect characters to key themes and plot points