63 pages • 2-hour read
Laila LalamiA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section contains discussions of child death, gender discrimination, racism, sexual content, and physical and emotional abuse.
Sara dreams of going on a hike with Elias, who refuses to listen to her, doesn’t allow breaks, and takes pictures of her when she isn’t in the mood. She swats the camera away and Elias falls off a rope bridge into a river. Sara wakes up and records the dream after the morning check, deciding it means she is concerned about Elias’s burdens since she is in retention and cannot help him. She thinks about how her lawyer, Abdo, cannot access the algorithm since the company has ruled that it is private. He uses her reports and description of her dreams to make their case.
At breakfast, Sara decides to not buy an apple for an eight-dollar premium. Her friend Alice is eagerly discussing Kindred by Octavia Butler. Lucy says she once lived next door to Octavia Butler, which none of them believe. They discuss the VR adaptations of Kindred and talk to Eisley, who reluctantly admits she is a fitness trainer for FitClient but works for “normal people,” which the others laugh at. Eisley argues that her clients prioritize fitness regardless of the cost and are therefore responsible people, but the others point out that the trainers make money on people needing good health scores to get affordable insurance. They argue with Eisley about the inaccessibility of exercise, but she refuses to see their points. Sara notices Hinton watching Eisley and stares at him too long. Her attention is drawn away by Marcela, who asks for help with the letter. When Lucy asks if she’s writing to her boyfriend, Marcela snaps at her, and they get into their first squabble, startling Sara and making Eisley laugh.
Sara goes to work and thinks about her last email from Elias, which was uneventful; she worries that Elias is losing interest in her, especially since he hasn’t taken time to visit her in the Virtual Conjugal Room in a long time. She met Elias when she went to the store to find a frame to preserve a picture of her younger brother, Saïd. Elias ran into her with his cart, sparking a discussion.
Later, Sara poses for Emily’s drawings. Emily explains that her protagonist, Rina, isn’t a superhero, but someone struggling to live a normal life despite her superpowers. Emily talks about how her girlfriend, Clara, wants her to get a new job as a comic artist, as firefighters make minimal money and are in constant danger. Sara dwells on the changing definition of the law, and how Elias’s two ancestors—one Irish and one Mexican—were received in America very differently. During the afternoon check, Sara doesn’t receive any mail and barely restrains her tears.
An extended series of emails to PostPal customer service shows that Sara’s calls have been dropped and her funds used without any actual time spent on the phone. PostPal refuses to refund her because of service minimums. Later emails show that the system described Sara as sick, preventing Elias from visiting her, and the scheduling system breaks. Sara confirms that her account is still active, despite her lack of emails.
Sara dreams about getting lunch in a French bistro with her husband. He caresses her and touches her sexually, but when she looks at him, he is Hinton; she tries to scream but moans with pleasure. She wakes and sits in shame and misery for a while before the morning check.
Sara reads historical databases and considers how much information the RAA must be missing, as many people don’t use the sleep devices. She thinks about the girlfriend of her former roommate who won a grant and used it to go off-grid, dropping out of her PhD to resist technology. Although this was 12 years prior, Sara now understands the woman’s reasoning. Sara tries to search for the woman on the internet but can only find her name and a few published papers. A facial recognition search reveals a picture of her. She gave the newspaper an alias, and she wears a bandana in other pictures. In response to growing surveillance, many people, like the woman, are now Twenty-Thirders, using technology for less than an hour a day from a secure connection.
In the laundry room, Toya explains that the interviewers shredded her entire history, her dreams, and her abstract behaviors, and her detainment has been extended again. Toya and Sara try to read in the heat, but eventually take off their shirts, which should be allowed since the laundry room is a restricted area. Hinton confronts them about the lack of shirts, insulting Sara’s breast size. He forces her to layer on multiple shirts until she can barely move.
Sara later goes to Marcela and agrees to help her write the letter. Marcela says that she’s found out that Lucy is a scammer and is getting sued by a victim. Sara thinks about how she hasn’t done anything as extreme as the other people in detention, yet she has been trapped just as long.
The chapter starts with a series of emails between Sara and her attorney, Abdo. Abdo repeatedly reminds her to follow the rules and keep her head down. Her case is plagued by government shutdowns, unexpected delays, and a computer malware incident that destroys her case file.
Sara dreams that she finally gets a hearing, which is held in a former pre-K classroom. An RAA agent, a Safe-X case agent, and a Dreamsaver representative interrogate her. Abdo is late to the hearing and inattentive throughout their harsh assessment of her. The Safe-X representative cites multiple disciplinary actions, one of which Sara has no memory of, but Abdo refuses to defend her, The Dreamsaver employee says that her dreams have been increasingly violent. They call her a murderer, and she wakes with a jolt, falling out of her bed. She remembers being denied entry to a concert despite having tickets when she was 15, resulting in an usher assaulting her. After she kicked and shoved him, security dragged her out of the venue.
At breakfast, the women discuss the new brand of tea, and Sara learns Toya got assigned an extra three months. Eisley is still resistant to the idea that the women in the center could be innocent, believing they have done something to deserve their treatment. Sara tries to explain that the algorithm and the RAA look for negative evidence instead of positive evidence, giving them a bias against the people they retain. Eisley is dismissive.
Later, Sara waits in line for an hour to call Elias, but he answers coldly, explaining that he is working. He gives her little information about the kids and seems actively distracted. She confronts him about forgetting her birthday and not emailing, but Elias blames her for making his life hard by being uncooperative during retainment. He apologizes quickly, but she hangs up on him.
Sara’s medical report from Safe-X is replicated on the first pages, including her allergies, women’s health notes, behavioral history (including the associated risk factors), family history, and medical history. The doctor notes that she denied Sara anxiety medication despite her diagnosis, which elevates Sara’s risk. Sara’s surname is misspelled throughout the document.
Sara spends time in the windowless worship room with the nonfunctioning device meant to project sermons; while Safe-X is supposed to respect and provide for all spiritual and religious needs of their retainees, this is the only accommodation they offer. She dwells on the meaning of dreams in religions, specifically in Islam, and considers how much she resents Elias for being a good father. She catches herself smiling at the idea of all of Joseph’s dreams shaping religion and quickly controls her face back into neutrality.
Sara and the others exercise in the yard; Sara spots men unloading construction equipment and is baffled. Marcela joins her and shares that the guitar request was denied quickly. Sara and Marcela watch the men unload, and Sara realizes they are planning to expand the school to house more inmates. Marcela decides to try again with her request, and Sara refuses to help. She goes inside and notices that construction cleanup was added to the list of jobs for the inmates.
Sara showers and comes out to find Toya, Lucy, and Marcela talking in the hallway. She learns that despite having an afternoon hearing, Lucy has been released. Lucy is cagey about how the hearing went, and Toya confronts her about committing ID fraud, which Lucy hurtfully rebuts, explaining that the customer is suing the entire company regardless of their involvement with the information breach. Marcela accuses her of being a pedophile due to her dreams, making Sara panic, and Lucy gets defensive. Marcela pushes Lucy. The guards appear and confront the women, and Hinton writes all of them except Lucy up despite their lack of involvement.
A Safe-X security questionnaire is reproduced on the first page, including questions about the user’s knowledge of other retainees, except for one question about the behavior of the attendants.
One morning, Sara waves to the basket-making woman, who waves back. She records her dream—she was at a fancy hotel on the Italian riviera and found her mother there, but her mother wants to stay somewhere else. She argues with the hotel clerk about the terms of their room, insisting it is refundable, and pushes him. Her mother died of lung cancer months before the vaccine for the cancer was approved, which grieves Sara. Sara dwells on her brother’s death; she was at a pool party at her cousin’s house playing hide and seek, but she refused to let her brother, Saïd, join her hiding place. The next thing she knew, she was looking at Saïd’s drowned body in the pool and blaming herself for his death. Sara’s family fell apart after Saïd’s death, with her father withdrawing from family life and her mother smoking and struggling to keep the family together. Sara believes the dream represents her guilt at not reading the terms and conditions for the Dreamsaver but wonders if that is a fair expectation.
Sara enters a daydream state, imagining her normal life at home with her children, but is interrupted by Toya, who comments that construction has the highest number of fatal injuries and the highest amount of fraud. She explains that deciding who to investigate for fraud was a gut feeling, not an observable pattern. This disturbs Sara, but Toya points out that they are both going to have to go into different careers, making her previous job pointless.
Sara reads the headlines and notices that the RAA’s chief administrator, James Wesley, is getting married. She is filled with rage at the realization that the man who ruined her life with an algorithm is living an ordinary family life while she is stuck in prison, watched over by people who refuse to view her as a person. Eisley comes into the library, and the officer tries to get Victoria to leave her spot for Eisley. Victoria flirts with him until he cancels the writeup, impressing Sara.
That evening, Sara receives a package from her family—a drawing and a birthday card from the twins and money for snacks from Elias. She relishes the drawing and the fond memories of Elias it gives her and runs to the commissary to buy herself a treat.
Zach Miller, Sara’s cousin with an old criminal record, writes her two emails with updates on her father and advice for retention. Zach reminisces about their childhood and says that her father still blames her for the retainment, believing that she is difficult. Zach’s arrest was on false charges but still affects his record and impacts his family life, with his wife divorcing him. He has trouble seeing his daughters. He asks Sara if he can help her. In the second letter, Zach apologizes if he hurt Sara’s feelings and explains that his case is getting cleared up and his business has been recognized by the town government for community service.
Sara has a strange dream about Albert Finney and a politician asking her to ride carrots through the sky over Los Angeles. She wakes up, confused about whether the dream was sexual, and decides it is just silly. She has a moment of disassociation in the mirror until she unties her hair and loosens her posture.
Sara is forced to exchange parts of her dinner with Toya because the meal is not halal. Sara watches as Victoria leaves with a nosebleed and one of her tablemates steals her food. Eisley joins their table and shares that, after her first hearing, she has been released. Nobody has been released that fast in months. Eisley is shocked to learn that Sara has never had a hearing but still defends the process, insisting that everyone is “just doing their jobs” (166).
Continuing the development The Ethics of Surveillance and the Importance of Personal Privacy, this section begins by detailing Sara’s legal troubles, including the fact that her lawyer, Abdo, cannot access the algorithm reading Sara’s dreams due to it being proprietary information. This reveals that privacy is not something completely erased in her society; privacy and secrecy are very valued if you are powerful enough to demand it. Coupled with the later reveal that the rich and powerful are not having their dream data sold and harvested for privacy reasons, it quickly becomes clear that privacy is for the privileged rather than a right. An algorithm having more right to privacy than Sara demonstrates that people in power will only enforce privacy laws when it benefits them—people like Sara will never have a right to privacy unless they fight for it themselves. Once again, Sara’s society has flipped the value of humans and machines and valued an AI above the “ordinary” person due to the potential money it can make. This inversion reflects a dangerous economic logic: People have value only when their suffering is monetizable.
The regular inclusion of documents from outside the narrative—meeting minutes, newspaper clips, etc.—creates a form of irony, particularly in this section, by making the reader complicit in destroying Sara’s privacy. While she is a fictional character, and thus has no “real” privacy to protect, the inclusion of her medical report removes the narrative barrier between her and the reader, publicizing her secrets as part of the text. This narrative technique heightens the novel’s critique of surveillance by implicating the reader as both consumer and observer. It prompts readers to confront their own role in a culture that commodifies private information under the guise of transparency or justice. In the case of Sara’s medical report, the document’s cold, clinical tone contrasts with her inner vulnerability, reminding readers that official records often strip away humanity even as they claim to reveal it.
Safe-X’s commitment to exposing her secrets extends to her medical records, yet this is par for the course; they refuse to give the women free tampons unless they consent to have their period tracked, providing even more data for their hungry algorithms. The lack of medical privacy creates a sharp contrast with the expectations of modern society. However, Sara still manages to keep some secrets. For example, the medical report shares that, in retention, she has a female sexual partner on a casual basis, yet nothing in the narrative implies who this could be, and she is narratively extremely loyal to her husband. Even if she has sex with a woman in retention, it is clear she does not view this as cheating, nor are her emotions tangled in it. The medical report’s lack of detail is another reminder that pure data doesn’t understand everything.
Although the narrative proves until the novel ends that data cannot prove anything, Eisley stands in firm opposition to this point, occupying a nearly antagonistic role in her firm belief that the retainees have done something to deserve their retention. Eisley’s characterization builds on the theme of The Personal Harm of the Prison Industrial Complex, as she provides a biased external perspective to the horrifying truths of the Safe-X system. This perspective foreshadows the reveal that Eisley is not just a “tourist,” but a plant sent to experiment on the women. Eisley’s external perspective means that she does not have to think about her own potential guilt since she knows she will be protected and removed as soon as she finishes her experiment. She represents the worst aspects of people in positions of privilege and power; she is completely unaware of her own privilege and perceives all people as inferior due to their own actions rather than the system she participates in. Her close-minded perspective extends beyond the concept of guilt versus innocence, however, as detailed in their conversation about health and fitness. Eisley is seemingly incapable of comprehending systemic injustice, believing that anyone who wants something can achieve it if they simply try hard enough. In this way, she becomes a mouthpiece for capitalist individualism, unable to recognize how structural violence shapes individual outcomes. Ultimately, Eisley’s bias against the retainees is a form of self-protection, as she would otherwise have to admit injustice to a degree that could ruin her life and perception of the world.
A key moment of irony arises with Sara’s surreal “carrot” dream, in which she soars over Los Angeles astride vegetables—an absurd and disorienting image that is later revealed to be part of a marketing experiment. The Dreamsaver company used Sara’s brain as a test site for subconscious advertising, layering dystopian surveillance with everyday consumer manipulation. This moment bridges the novel’s two major systems of control—state violence and corporate profit—and shows how indistinguishable they have become in Sara’s world. Her unconscious is no longer hers; it is a site for profit, experimentation, and control.
The tension between Sara and Elias also intensifies in this section, shifting from mutual longing to estrangement. His growing emotional distance, combined with his earlier decision to pressure Sara into using the Dreamsaver, deepens the novel’s exploration of how domestic power dynamics mirror state control. Elias sees himself as supportive but expects cooperation, silence, and assimilation from Sara even as she is dehumanized by the state. He, too, benefits from her submission—emotionally, socially, and logistically—just as Safe-X benefits from her labor.
Other quiet but significant moments in this section deepen Sara’s emotional arc and the novel’s thematic scope. When she poses for Emily’s drawings, she is invited to see herself as a character in someone else’s story—a subtle restoration of personhood and mutual witnessing. Emily’s comic protagonist, Rina, is not a hero but someone navigating ordinary life despite extraordinary burdens, much like Sara herself. In another quiet moment, Sara spends time in the worship room, where the nonfunctioning sermon projector reflects Safe-X’s hollow claims of religious accommodation. She meditates on the spiritual weight of dreams, particularly in Islamic tradition, and momentarily smiles at the idea of Joseph’s dreams shaping religion. Her fleeting smile suggests a moment of regrounding in her faith and cultural identity, even within a system that marginalizes her and implicitly validates only Christian norms. The fact that she must hide this smile underscores how even internal affirmation becomes dangerous under constant surveillance. Sara also must trade food with other retainees because the meals are not halal, a quiet reminder that her identity as a Muslim woman is both disregarded and surveilled. This moment of involuntary joy in her smile—and the immediate suppression of it—symbolizes how surveillance robs even interiority of freedom. These scenes, while small, emphasize the theme of Human Relationships as Resistance to Authoritarianism, and show how brief connections, inner reflections, and emotional restraint become radical acts in a world that polices thoughts.
This section ends with Sara at a precarious emotional crossroads. She is surrounded by loss: of privacy, of family connection, of bodily autonomy, and of belief in fairness. Yet even in the depths of this systemic erasure, she finds moments of self-definition: refusing to help Marcela again, preserving the privacy of her relationship history, imagining a world outside Madison. Her quiet resistance begins to sharpen, no longer grounded in hope that the system will work, but in the growing recognition that it must be challenged from within. As construction begins to expand Madison’s capacity, and as bureaucratic errors prolong innocent women’s detention, Sara’s arc evolves from quiet endurance to simmering rebellion, setting the stage for the slow, collective defiance that follows.



Unlock all 63 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.