55 pages 1-hour read

The Iron Heel

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1908

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Authorial Context: Jack London and Socialist Activism

John Griffith “Jack” London was born in San Francisco in 1876 and grew up in the working class. As a youth, he worked various jobs in a cannery, jute mill, and power plant that were formative in his development as a socialist writer and activist. As an older, returning high school student in Oakland, California, he published political essays in the Oakland High School magazine, The Aegis, and earned the nickname “the boy Socialist of Oakland” in The San Francisco Chronicle. London joined the Socialist Labor Party in 1896 and delivered impassioned speeches in the Oakland City Hall park. He was a member of the radical literary group The Crowd, which formed in 1898, and he ran for mayor of Oakland in 1901 and 1905 as a member of the Socialist Party. In 1903, he published his firsthand account of poverty in the East End of London in the book The People of the Abyss. London moved to Sonoma County in 1905 and delivered lectures titled “The Coming Crisis” and “Revolution” throughout the country. 


London mirrors his personal biography in the character of Ernest Everhard, the protagonist and author surrogate of The Iron Heel. Like London, Ernest is an active member of the Socialist Party and is discovered by Dr. Cunningham while delivering provocative speeches in the streets. In Chapter 5, portions of Ernest’s fierce speech to the Philomath Club, a gathering of captains of industry, is taken verbatim from London’s 1905-1906 lecture “Revolution.” The novel also makes significant references to the working class as “people of the abyss.” The refuge in Sonoma County where Avis and Ernest hide out is an allusion to Beauty Ranch, London’s property in Glen Ellen, California, where he lived from 1905 until his death in 1916. Ernest serves as a mouthpiece for London’s political views, and the first half of the novel is comprised of what Avis calls his “Working-class Philosophy” (27). Avis frequently refers to her husband’s evocative speeches as a “clarion-call” for class consciousness and revolution (8, 23, 61), which echoes London’s commitment to the socialist cause. The character of Avis may also be modeled on London’s second wife, Charmian Kittridge London, whom he married in 1905.

Literary and Ideological Context: Early Dystopian Fiction and Socialist Criticism

The Iron Heel is considered an early example of dystopian fiction and an influential text in modern dystopian novels. The novel’s framing device of the found, ancient text allows London to critique historical and present-day patterns of socioeconomic and political oppression. Avis’s perspective is preserved in her hidden, personal journal, which indicates a world where individual liberty and free speech are suppressed. The Everhard Manuscript is presented as an artifact that attests to a grim past that is read in a utopian future. Anthony Meredith, the scholar from the future who introduces the manuscript and provides robust annotations, represents the optimistic telos of a classless society that is centuries in the making. 


The dystopian features of the novel are inextricable from London’s critique of capitalism and the dehumanization of the labor class. London’s narrative follows a trajectory of unchecked capitalism, where social injustices are sanctioned and perpetuated by institutions propped up by the Oligarchy, a class of industry titans. The capitalists’ reach extends beyond the realm of economics and subsumes the actions of the government, the military, religion, education, and culture. Informed by the founding of American labor union federations in the late 1880s, the rise of the Socialist Party in the early 1900s, and the 1905 Russian Revolution, the novel’s treatment of uprisings and suppressions is both imaginative and realistic. In his review of the novel, George Orwell placed The Iron Heel in the company of H. G. Wells’s When the Sleeper Wakes (1899), Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World (1932), and Ernest Bramah’s The Secret of the League (1907) as prescient works on the rise of fascism. Leon Trotsky also praised the novel for its foresight, social analysis, and effectiveness in depicting class struggles. He wrote, “[I]t is precisely the picture of fascism, of its economy, of its governmental technique, its political psychology!” (Trotsky, Leon. “On The Iron Heel.” The New International, vol. XI, no. 3, Apr. 1945, p. 95). London’s depiction of class conflict and social inequalities remains relevant in contemporary critiques of global capitalism and modern dictatorships and plutocracies.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 55 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs