The Mad Wife

Meagan Church

50 pages 1-hour read

Meagan Church

The Mad Wife

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Background

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of mental illness, physical abuse, emotional abuse, and gender discrimination.

Cultural Context: Gendered Expectations in 1950s US

A number of factors contributed to the gendered expectations that characterized the middle-class white American family in the 1950s. US marriage rates skyrocketed after World War II, and heterosexual couples were getting married younger, commonly fresh out of high school or during college. Cold War propaganda put “the American family at the center of the struggle” by contrasting its wholesomeness with the supposedly bleak separation endured by Soviet children forced into care while their mothers worked (“Mrs. America: Women’s Roles in the 1950s.” PBS).


The media idealized domesticity and depicted the ideal white middle-class woman as a happy homemaker, content to raise multiple children while her husband served as the sole breadwinner. Depictions of beautiful wives with perfectly clean houses and model children were pervasive: “[A]n image was promoted of American women, with their feminine hairdos and delicate dresses, tending to the hearth and home as they enjoyed the fruits of capitalism, democracy, and freedom” (“Mrs. America: Women’s Roles in the 1950s”). Moreover, those who failed to conform to standards or wanted more fulfillment or purpose faced judgment. It was not until Betty Friedan’s 1963 second-wave feminism classic The Feminine Mystique that the idea that women should be entirely satisfied by domestic lives was widely questioned. Lulu finds the expectations stifling: She resists adhering to the cleaning schedule laid out by Good Housekeeping magazine, struggles to manage life with her son, and regrets giving up her dream of a career after college. The monotony of a life where her duty is to support her husband and children overwhelms her even before she experiences postpartum trauma and symptoms of lupus.


In the 1950s, few support systems were available to women who felt alienated from strict gender roles. The medical establishment developed tools primarily meant to pacify patients into acceptance; financial institutions made it difficult for women to be unmarried, as they were unable to open bank accounts or take out loans without male cosigners; and the oppressive fear of ostracism prevented women from speaking out. Lulu is afraid to share her real feelings for fear that she is the only woman who feels as she does; what concerns she does express are dismissed as “hysteria.”

Historical Context: Pathologizing Women’s Mental Health in 1950s US

In the middle of the 20th century, women who resisted or failed to meet gender expectations were often characterized as personally deficient and pathologized. The catch-all psychiatric diagnosis of “hysteria” was developed by male doctors to describe all emotions or behavior outside strict female gender norms, such as not wanting to have children or find fulfillment in domesticity. In response, women were prescribed tranquilizers in the hope of rendering them more complacent. However, medical treatment was typically experimental at best: Women were mostly excluded from medical trials as a result of “concerns about hormonal fluctuations ‘complicating’ study results,” so they were prescribed psychotropic medications that had been tested only on male patients (“The History of Women’s Mental Health and Why It Matters.” Wild Hope Therapy). Other, more invasive treatment modalities included electroconvulsive therapy, which remains in limited use today as an intervention for depression, and lobotomy, a completely discredited (and never scientifically proven in the first place) procedure that severed nerve connections in the prefrontal cortex of the brain to induce complacency and limit expression of personality and intellect. Although ostensibly only used for severe mental illness, tranquilizers, involuntary institutionalization, and lobotomy became ways to police “[w]omen who defied social norms—those who sought divorce, displayed sexual independence, or rejected traditional gender roles” (“The History of Women’s Mental Health and Why It Matters”).


Lulu experiences and is threatened with all these potential treatments: She is prescribed the popular tranquilizer Miltown, committed to a sanatorium by her husband, subjected to electroconvulsive therapy, and almost lobotomized. To avoid this fate, Lulu submits, like many real women did, hoping to prove her mental well-being to medical professionals, who were primed to diagnose “hysteria” in a woman like Lulu rather than the autoimmune disease she actually has: “[W]omen who had ‘ungovernable’ personalities […] were literally textbook examples of female insanity” (Moore, Kate. “Declared Insane for Speaking Up: The Dark American History of Silencing Women Through Psychiatry.” Time, 22 June 2021).

Literary Context: Domesticity, Marriage, and “Madness”

The novel’s title makes it clear that Maegan Church is drawing on a long literary tradition of the “mad” wife, a character archetype with significant cultural and political importance. The association of marriage, domesticity, imprisonment, and psychological unwellness originates from Charlotte Bronte’s 1847 novel Jane Eyre, in which the protagonist’s love interest is revealed to be keeping in secret imprisonment his first wife, who becomes a horrifying foil for Jane’s own potential future. This depiction created the “mad woman in the attic” trope of a wife locked up due to perceived mental illness by men in authority who believe that this is for her own good. The figure next appears in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s 1892 short story “The Yellow Wallpaper,” in which a husband is advised to physically and intellectually immobilize his wife, who suffers a mental-health crisis due to isolation and infantilization. In 1966’s Wide Sargasso Sea, Jean Rhys retells the story of Jane Eyre’s imprisoned wife from Bertha Mason’s own point of view, situating her mental state in systemic forces of patriarchal and colonial control. The nuanced complexities raised by this set of depictions then became a focal point of scholarly critique that foregrounded women; in 1979, Sandra M. Gilbert and Susan Gubar titled their seminal work of feminist literary criticism The Madwoman in the Attic.


The Mad Wife makes clear allusions to this history. Like “The Yellow Wallpaper” and Wide Sargasso Sea, it is narrated in the first person from the perspective of the trapped woman. Like the protagonist of “The Yellow Wallpaper,” Lulu hallucinates that images in the wallpaper are moving (in her case, butterflies). Like the characters in all these pieces of fiction, Lulu ends up imprisoned against her will by the authority of her husband and the medical establishment, with no legal authority to escape or insist on her bodily autonomy.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 50 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs