49 pages • 1-hour read
Jeneva RoseA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of graphic violence, sexual violence, drug use, addiction, emotional abuse, and death.
The Perfect Divorce centralizes Sarah Morgan and Bob Miller’s relationship and divorce to explore the consequences of breaking a loved one’s trust. Sarah and Bob have been together for roughly a decade, but they no longer trust each other in the narrative present. Sarah has filed for divorce because she discovered that Bob was cheating on her. Aware that Sarah is capable of hurting those who wrong her, Bob no longer trusts Sarah after he learns that she’s aware of his infidelity. As soon as trust breaks down between the couple, Sarah and Bob are incapable of coexisting. They not only stop living together and begin divorce proceedings but also pursue elaborate plans to destroy one another. Their separate and overlapping desires to ruin each other’s lives capture the unsustainability of intimate relationships that lack trust.
On the surface, Sarah and Bob’s marriage was founded on mutual trust, secrecy, understanding, and protection. However, as the novel unfolds, Sarah’s and Bob’s respective first-person narratives reveal that Sarah has never trusted Bob, and Bob has never trusted Sarah. Sarah has kept Bob close to her since Kelly Summers’s death and Adam Morgan’s trial, but she has never believed she could be truly close with Bob. Meanwhile, Bob has believed the same about Sarah, leading him to take defensive measures like keeping the knife from Kelly’s murder instead of destroying it per Sarah’s instruction: “I knew from the very beginning I had to have an insurance policy with Sarah, something to guarantee she could never do to me what she did to her first husband Adam” (52). The knife is a symbol of Bob’s mistrust: He has never fully embraced Sarah as his equal and has always feared that she would betray him for her own gain. Throughout the novel, he repeatedly wishes that he “knew what she was thinking, what thoughts [are] coursing through that brilliant, diabolical mind of hers” so that he could understand her true motives (92). However, because he finds her inaccessible, he continues to doubt her and seek her death. Meanwhile, because Sarah believes that Bob’s interests have always been selfish, too, the couple’s relationship has been founded on deceit and suspicion. As a result, when the couple faces the Ryan Stevens conflict, they attack each other instead of working together.
Sarah and Bob’s relationship dynamics suggest that if the individual doesn’t have trusting intimate relationships, she will end up on her own. This proves true for both Sarah and Bob. Sarah does everything in her power to destroy Bob, and Bob ends up dying alone, without knowing the truth surrounding Stacy Howard and Carissa Brooks. Sarah triumphs over Bob and ends up back on her own at the novel’s end with the confirmation of her lifelong suspicion: Men can’t be trusted, and, as a result, intimacy with them is impossible. Because she is so convinced of this, Sarah never extends trust to Bob, preventing the development of intimacy and creating a self-fulfilling prophecy. With the disintegration of Bob and Sarah’s relationship, the novel probes how lack of trust erodes the possibility of true intimacy.
Sarah, Bob, and Marcus’s internal journeys over the course of the novel capture the psychological impact that an individual’s past can have on her life in the present. Although Sarah, Bob, and Marcus are autonomous adults, they often feel trapped between the people they once were, the mistakes they made, and the lives they are trying to cultivate. The more they attempt to bury their pasts, the more burdened they are by guilt, shame, fear, or anger in the present.
For Sarah, the past is a realm defined by abuse, loneliness, pain, and violence, and it has haunted her since she was a little girl. When her first-person narration infrequently shifts into flashback, Sarah is overcome by memories of her past trauma that provide insight into her psychology in the narrative present:
His answer reminds me of my own upbringing. My father passing. My mother spiraling, using drugs to cope. Losing everything. Being forced to live in motels. Her bringing strange men back to our room, ones that would give her a fix in return for the only thing she had left to offer them…herself. And sometimes, even that wasn’t enough. They would look to me after she’d passed out, like I was some sort of a bonus. I always fought them off…one way or another. You do what you have to do to survive (110).
Ever since this traumatic era of her life, Sarah has been surviving. Killing her mother, killing Kelly Summers, allowing Adam Morgan to take responsibility for her crime, framing Bob, and killing Bob are all manifestations of her desire to save herself—an instinct that originated from her childhood. From a young age, she learned that she was the only one who would protect her, and she has carried this truth throughout her adult life. Her reasons for destroying everyone else around her are rooted in her trauma and her desire to both erase and rise above this past era of her life.
Bob and Marcus are similarly impacted by their past experiences and mistakes, and they work to either avoid or confront these fraught aspects of their personal histories. For Bob, the past is defined by his brother Greg’s murder and his own involvement in Kelly’s death. In the present, he is willing to destroy Sarah to avoid accepting culpability for his actions. In contrast, Marcus is determined to right his past wrongs: He wants to solve the mysteries surrounding Kelly Summers, Ryan Stevens, Stacy Howard, and Carissa Brooks because he knows he failed to administer justice years before. For Marcus, transcending the past is an avenue to redemption, whereas for Bob, escaping the past is the only way to save himself. Each of these characters takes a different route to escape the burdens of the past, but they all understand the importance of resolving their past trauma in order to be fully present in their current lives.
The Perfect Divorce explores the conflicts associated with navigating contrasting versions of self through a complex character study of Sarah Morgan. For Sarah, embracing her true self has never been her mode of operating. Instead of claiming what she really feels, wants, or believes, Sarah has constructed an elaborate guise to convince the rest of the world that she is a nominally good person. In reality, Sarah has committed a series of gruesome crimes that no one believes she’d be capable of. Sarah feels compelled to deceive the world into believing she’s someone other than the person she is because she knows that her culture won’t accept the truth. The way she processes this dichotomy between her true self and her public persona in the 60 Minutes interview captures the totality of her internal conflict:
Good versus evil is mankind’s oldest fight. It’s clichéd and overly simplified because people aren’t inherently good or evil. They’re a little of both, maybe more of one than the other, but that’s too complicated for most to digest. So, I’ll give them simple. The light on set brightens just a little before I answer. How poetic (277).
Sarah acknowledges that she is playing a part and that she has used stereotypical notions of femininity, docility, and idealized “womanhood” to her advantage. She has bought into these gender stigmas because she believes that the world has little interest in the truth—whether it pertains to murder mysteries or the individual’s veritable identity.
Sarah’s storyline creates a social commentary on the curation of the self. She believes that she has no choice but to use her intelligence and manipulative tendencies to protect herself. Because the culture wants women to perform their identities in one conventional way, women feel they have no choice but to curate a public persona that will allow them to survive. Sarah’s story hyperbolizes this sociopolitical phenomenon but does so as a way of underscoring the oppressive nature of gender stereotypes and expectations. Sarah isn’t allowed to be angry, cruel, or vengeful because she’s a woman. This is why she does everything in her power to maintain the curated and sterilized public image for the benefit of others: Doing so keeps her safe. Through Sarah’s story, Rose explores the way this tension between private and public personas manifests for women in contemporary American society.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.