Consider the literary references Lankford draws on in her own book. How does she use these, and in what ways do they inform her approach and style?

Discuss how Lankford uses the physical geography of the Pacific Crest Trail, particularly the treacherous San Jacinto Mountains, as an active antagonist in the narrative. Pay particular attention to visual imagery and figurative language.

Trail of the Lost presents a complex portrait of technology. Do you think  technology ultimately clarifies or complicates the search for truth in the narrative? Explain why, using examples.

The narrative focuses on a team led primarily by women. How does Lankford draw on and present women in her narrative, and what effects does this have?

Lankford’s presentation of Pam Coronado is ambiguous in the book: sometimes complimentary and sometimes skeptical. In your opinion, what does Lankford really think or feel about Pam, and why? Use examples from the text to support your interpretation.

How does Lankford’s integration of professional SAR terminology and statistical frameworks, like the Koester Model, intersect with the conventions of the popular true-crime genre? Consider the ways in which she interprets these elements for the reader.

The citizen-led SAR network is shown to yield successes but also problems. We you convinced by Lankford’s argument that this is a necessary and mainly positive force? Why, or why not?

Consider the order in which Lankford reveals the clues and information about Chris Sylvia. How does this sequencing affect your understanding of what may have happened to Chris, and why?