65 pages • 2-hour read
Lindsay StraubeA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Tem’s recognition and embrace of her hybreed identity forces her to face traits that are human society would consider morally dubious. The novel shows that she reaches a fuller sense of self once she brings her feral and predatory instincts into her identity instead of hiding them. Tem’s hyper-sexuality, aggression, and lethal potential appear in the book as an awakening that strengthens her humanity rather than eroding it. When she accepts these morally ambiguous traits, she steps outside narrow definitions of correct behavior and finds a new source of power.
Almost as soon as Tem begins to experiment with her basilisk powers, she becomes curious about the practice of petrification (killing humans by turning them into stone). While they don’t use it lightly, the power of petrification is part of the basilisk birthright. Their history of being persecuted by humans makes it all the more legitimate that they would want the ability to defend themselves. When Apollo eventually shows Tem the remains of all the victims of petrification, he is quick to point out that these deaths counterbalance the numerous basilisks who have been imprisoned and tortured via bloodletting. Tem also has significant personal reasons for wanting the ability to defend herself: She faces threats from both humans and other basilisks, and she has been sexually assaulted in the past. After the latter incident, Caspen petrified her attackers and Tem views it as reasonable to want this power for herself.
However, er push to learn petrification marks the boldest step in her transformation. Caspen refuses to teach her and says, “I would not have you become a monster” (25), revealing his own regret and a limited idea of morality. Tem sees the ability differently. To her, the power to kill is part of her nature, and Caspen’s refusal keeps her from understanding herself. She turns to Apollo to learn the skill and shows her commitment to every part of her basilisk heritage, including its lethal side. That choice breaks from passive ideals of womanhood and lets her claim her predatory nature as part of her strength. When she and Apollo choose a target for her petrification lesson, they choose an elderly man who is approaching death. This decision reflects the moral ambiguity of their act but shows that neither of them is callous about taking life.
While Tem does not end up needing to use her newly learned skill of petrification, this lesson is an important step toward embracing her basilisk instincts and their pull towards violence. When she watches Caspen and Rowe fight during the tournament, she is astonished to realize that she finds the violence arousing. When she finally has sex with Leo, she can barely control the intense instincts that are aroused by the bond of the crest and her basilisk impulse to hurt him. In fact, Tem has to resort to asking Caspen for help, telepathically pleading “how do I stop myself from hurting him?” (452). The intertwined nature of sex and violence (Tem is also left sexually voracious after she petrifies for the first time) reflects two modes of behavior where Tem must reconcile herself to moral ambiguity. After her awakening, she finds herself “constantly, untenably, desperate for more” (17) and initially sees this state as “completely feral, like a wild animal” (17). Life in basilisk society reframes this drive. Public orgies reinforce the community’s cohesion, and sexual skill shapes one’s rank. Caspen urges her to explore these urges and even permits her to sleep with other basilisks. His stance recasts her heightened libido as a cultural norm and an expression of her authority as a basilisk queen.
Tem’s feminine identity adds an extra layer of complexity to the need for her to accept and embrace her inner lust and violence. In her human society, these qualities are viewed with suspicion but sometimes tolerated in men. When Gabriel, for example, first encounters the licentious basilisk society, he has no qualms about joining in. Tem has to gradually accept her immense sexual appetite and her capacity to kill. She shows the successful completion of this arc when she saves the basilisks from Rowe’s attempted take-over by having sex with Leo to augment her powers and then killing Rowe. Tem steps into the full force of her power only when she ceases to feel shame about morally ambiguous actions. The story shows her moving toward command of the powerful creature she is turning into rather than searching for the person she once was.
Love, duty, and fate collide with painful consequences in Between Two Kings, where emotions repeatedly clash with political responsibility and established bonds. Though Tem genuinely loves both the human king Leo and the basilisk king Caspen, the novel shows the inevitable cost of this divided loyalty. Ties such as the blood bond and the crest trap the characters in choices shaped by loss. Tem’s story shows how every direction she turns leads to sacrifice once personal love, marital obligation, and fated attraction pull against one another.
Her position in the central love triangle places her inner longings and her public role in conflict. Her marriage to Caspen ties her to the basilisks and names her their queen, yet her love for Leo endures. She admits that the part of her that “ached for him” is “as real and as prominent as the part that loved Caspen” (7). This conflict touches more than her romantic life because it requires her to choose between two realms and two versions of herself. Duty holds her in the mountains with Caspen while her heart ties her to Leo, leaving her suspended between worlds.
The blood bond with Caspen and the crest with Leo turn this divide into danger. The blood bond signals her commitment to Caspen and carries fatal consequences if she breaks it. Caspen explains that if she sleeps with someone she loves, a curse will drive him to kill her. The crest brings a different kind of risk. Kronos tells Tem that if she does not consummate it by sleeping with Leo, “the object of the crest will die” (208). These bonds shape her dilemma into an impossible trap. To honor the crest, she must betray her marriage and trigger a curse that will end her own life. Every option leads toward death, which shows that even within the supposed freedom of basilisk society, there is no way for her to reconcile the experience of loving two men at the same time.
The tournament adds additional pressure since the contest aims to reveal her “true mate,” and this fated pull outweighs any practical choice she might make. Caspen says that the heart’s choice is not a “practical choice, but a fated one,” and everyone involved must accept the result (273). Tem’s path would be difficult to navigate even if it could be resolved by her making an analytical and strategic decision about who is the best partner. However, she is denied this option because she is compelled to operate according to her innermost longings, even if those can only lead to tragedy.
The conflict between love, duty, and fate comes to a head when Caspen recognizes that Leo is Tem’s true love and comes up with a plan to sacrifice himself so that the two of them can be together. Tem is horrified when she realizes Caspen has chosen to die. The fact that he withholds the plan from her until it is too late reveals that she would have been unable to accept it; due to his supernatural nature and his immense age, Caspen is able to stoically accept that he and Tem are not meant to be together. He finds happiness in the fact that he was able to experience loving and being loved by her. Even though Caspen’s death is portrayed as a peaceful and noble sacrifice, the fact that Tem’s basilisk nature dies alongside him reveals the true cost of this outcome.
Both the political and interpersonal conflicts that unfold in the novel are anchored in beliefs about greed, scarcity, and insecurity. The coveted resource might be money, power, or even an object of love and desire, but when individuals become fearful of not having enough (or become obsessed with wanting more), conflict is inevitable. Strikingly, the resolution of the plot also portrays these conflicts as irreconcilable, part of a zero-sum game in which opposing interests can never be mutually satisfied.
Prior to the beginning of Between Two Kings, Tem learns about the painful and exploitative practice of bloodletting (in which humans extract blood from nonconsenting basilisks and alchemize that blood into gold). She is horrified and persuades Leo to end the practice as soon as he assumes the throne. The plot of Between Two Kings explores the consequences of this decision, showing that (despite Tem’s earnest and idealistic intentions) it does not actually foster peace and stability within the kingdom. A hastily enacted economic reform means there is no alternative source of income and the human royals cling to their lavish lifestyle, passing the economic hardship onto the humbler residents of the village. Facing food shortages, the villagers become more incensed with the basilisks than ever. An attempt at economic reform only exacerbates the greed of some, and the precarity of others, leaving everyone more on edge and more willing to contemplate violent actions.
Greed is also shown to be a driving dynamic within interpersonal relationships. Evelyn is revealed to be motivated first and foremost by her desire for financial gain and luxury. She readily abandoned Leo when Maximus bribed her to do so, and she only returned because she knew that marrying Leo would catapult her own wealth and social standing. She shows her true colors throughout the novel by trying to convince Leo to reinstate bloodletting and even callously asking if blood could be drained from the bodies of the basilisks killed in the weasel attack. Evelyn’s compulsion to secure wealth and status is rooted in her early experience of precarity; like Tem, she grew up in a modest, working-class family and becomes unrelenting in her drive to secure a different future at any cost.
Notions of possession, scarcity, and resource-guarding also animate the sexual rivalry amongst Caspen and Tem, and Leo and Evelyn. Tem still sees Leo as belonging to her, since the magical bond of the crest conflicts with the legal bond of their respective marriages. Caspen and Evelyn are repeatedly frustrated by their spouses and Caspen struggles with a desire to know that he is the only one with access to Tem’s heart. He makes it clear (and the blood bond further cements) that Tem can have sex with whoever she wants, but he will not tolerate her loving anyone else. While the basilisks from the Seneca clan covet Tem as a source of power and prestige, treating her like an object to be hoarded, Caspen is also guilty of trying to greedily possess exclusive access to Tem’s heart.
In the end, greed causes fractures that cannot be resolved. Evelyn abandons Leo for a second time. The basilisks retreat to the sea, revealing that peace between humans and the magical creatures is an impossible goal. Perhaps most tragically, Caspen sacrifices himself, accepting that it is not possible for the competing desires to possess Tem to be reconciled. In all of these cases, stability is achieved when one party or faction cedes their loss, and no collective solution is offered. Whether it is the reinstatement of monogamy or the end of an attempt for two societies to share territory, stability is reestablished when one side triumphs, and the other retreats.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.