The Burning God

R. F. Kuang

68 pages 2-hour read

R. F. Kuang

The Burning God

Fiction | Novel | YA | Published in 2020

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Corrupting Influence of Power

Content Warning: This section contains discussion of racism, child abuse, child death, death by suicide, graphic violence, physical abuse, and emotional abuse.


This novel tracks Rin’s turn to Machiavellianism: This character type, extrapolated from Niccolò Machiavelli’s The Prince, uses political and interpersonal manipulation and a strategic lack of morals and empathy to gain and hold onto power. Rin’s Machiavellianism shows how manipulative, corrupt, and self-interested actions can lead to the accumulation of power, especially as Daji mentors her in the art of manipulating public perception. Rin’s character arc demonstrates that the accumulation of power itself can be a corrupting influence—a point reiterated in the sections that narrate Riga’s past journey into Machiavellianism, which parallels Rin’s in the present.


Daji’s two point-of-view chapters, which begin Parts 1 and 2, show Riga’s trajectory of being corrupted by power. In the first, he sacrifices a deer after they’ve just killed the Ketreyid Tseveri, in order to begin the anchor bond ritual between himself, Jiang, and Daji. It was a ritual they “lied, tortured, and murdered to obtain” (4) to become the most powerful Nikara alive. Here, they commit corrupt acts to gain power, while later Riga’s power itself leads to corrupt acts. Daji’s chapter in Part 2 shows the Trifecta at their most powerful, and thus at their most corrupt and destructive. Riga ties his power to his destructive actions, comparing himself to Jiang. While Jiang is taken over by the Gatekeeper—thus maintaining a moral distinction between his conscious self and this unconscious manifestation of power—Riga controls the power of the Dragon willfully and is fully corrupted by it. Riga accuses Jiang of hypocrisy, saying he “wake[s] up and start[s] whining about the people who are bold enough to do what’s necessary while fully conscious” (199). The “bold” action he is referring to is the genocide of the Speerlies, showing that Riga embodies the corrupting influence of power.


In the present timeline, Rin goes through a process of being corrupted by the power she accumulates, just as Riga was in the past. She feels euphoria committing violent acts like burning the barn full of people or the Grey Company member, not because of “the violence” but because of the “power” (261). Gradually, she stops thinking of her murderous acts as acts of violence, and instead thinks of them as acts of power. Expending destructive power corrupts and enables additional cruelty. Daji starts training Rin to use her power strategically, saying, “Power seduces. Exert it, make a show of it, and they’ll follow you” (224). Daji’s advice isn’t to rule fairly or justly, but to let power seduce and intimidate people. Daji calls this “the power of psychological warfare” (230): She claims that the Hesperians exercise it with their dirigibles, and shamans should also exercise it with their spiritual power, even if it leads to moral corruption and mass suffering.


Unlike Riga, who either never realized his corruption or didn’t care, Rin realizes how this theme operates in her life. She realizes that on her current trajectory there “would be no limits to her power” (610) and she’d never stop hurting her friends and millions of innocent lives. She also realizes that her power also gives her the ability to stop herself, while neither Nezha nor Kitay were “strong enough” to do so (611), leading Rin to die by suicide to stop the cycle of power and corruption.

The Dehumanizing Effects of War

The characters in the novel often explicitly address the moral calculus of wartime decisions, as they weigh what amount of collateral damage is acceptable to achieve a certain outcome. Every decision Rin and her select group of powerful peers make has massive consequences for millions of people. Though they are trained to shunt aside their empathy to create the supposedly “best” long-term outcomes, Rin’s actions show how destructive this utilitarian mindset can be, as the novel forces its reader to contend with the inevitable consequences of such calculations.


Rin uses dehumanizing language to desensitize herself to the harm she causes. Nikara use a “slur” for Mugenese, “crickets” (14), imagining they are bugs rather than humans. Rin thinks, “If they were Mugenese, that meant they were crickets and that meant when she crushed them under her heel, the universe hardly registered their loss” (23). By convincing herself that her enemies are not human at all, Rin avoids reckoning with the human cost of her genocide against them.


Rin takes a calculated approach to deciding whose lives have value. When Nikara are taken hostage by Mugenese, she asks her officer if the hostages are “important,” because “[w]omen and children could die without many ramifications. Local leadership likely couldn’t” (25). When Rin learns that the hostages aren’t “important,” she decides to burn them alive with the Mugenese rather than risk her soldiers trying to save them. When she liberates Southern cities, she “turn[s] them all to ash, civilians and enemies alike” (109). Rin doesn’t care who must die to achieve her victory. Kitay calls Rin “[a]stonishingly careless with human life” (155), showing that his calculations about the human cost of war differ greatly from hers, though he does nothing to stop her.


Rin does whatever she must to expunge the Mugenese and Hesperians from their land, regardless of the suffering she causes. To her, the human cost is justified by the ideals she believes she is fighting for. Whoever survives, she reasons, will live on in a better world. Venka points out that the human cost of war isn’t limited to being alive or dead at the end of the conflict. The method one takes to get there matters, as human cost can also be calculated in lasting and generational traumas: “You think it’s all over? Once they’re gone? […] They still come for you in your sleep. Only this time they’re dream-wraiths, not real, and there’s no escape from them because they’re living in your own mind” (131). Venka’s words demonstrate that the human cost of war cannot be reduced to the numbers of people who live or die.


Rin’s actions when victorious show her disregard for human life. She is often so thrilled to win “that she didn’t even care that she was screaming to corpses” (385). Her nominal victory means more than the actual humans affected by her actions. Only in her final moments does Rin realize that winning a war is hollow if everyone has died along the way.

The Multifaceted Nature of Empire and Colonialism

Through the intervention of Hesperia, the novel explores the ramifications of empire and colonialism. To a lesser degree, the novel also explores this theme via the Federation of Mugen, who colonize the Nikara mainland after Rin destroys their home, the Longbow Island. The clash of empires in The Burning God parallels real world conflicts in Asia during World War II, and the novel functions as a loose allegory for this period in world history. Hesperia is analogous to Britain and France, while Mugen is analogous to Imperial Japan. Rin’s Southern Coalition correlates to Mao Zedong’s Communist Red Army, while Vaisra and Nezha’s Republicans correlate to the Nationalists, who attempted to work with the European colonists that Communists considered imperialists. While The Poppy War delved into Mugenese invasion and The Dragon Republic showcased Hesperia’s colonial strategy, The Burning God is about how people in a colonized country interact with their oppressors, as they are forced to reckon with colonial violence and cultural erasure.


In resisting Hesperian imperialism, leaders in Nikan sometimes become oppressors in their own right. People like Rin and Daji will sacrifice anything to resist the Hesperians, who come from a distant land and view themselves as superior to everyone in Rin’s world. However, as part of the Trifecta, Daji ruled over the annexed tributary state of Speer, seeking to subjugate them just as the Hesperians seek to subjugate all of Nikara. Daji created a false narrative about the Mugenese committing a genocide in Speer as part of their imperial efforts, to cover up how Riga was actually responsible for the event.


Rin likewise rightly sees Hesperia as the threat to Nikara culture. However, she perpetuates the same dehumanizing rhetoric toward the Mugenese that the Hesperians perpetuate toward her. Rin is conflicted and angered by Hesperia’s claims toward racial and religious supremacy, especially she knows her Pantheon really exists, in contrast to the distant, conjectural god of the Hesperians. Rin craves a more nuanced view of multiculturalism than the Hesperians provide, but she perpetuates the same rhetoric when discussing the Mugenese. When killing them she convinces herself that it doesn’t matter that “they were nothing, nothing like the monsters she had once known” because she is fighting “war of racial totality” that demands black and white categorizations (23). To morally justify her own actions, Rin generalizes all Mugenese, not unlike the way Hesperia generalizes all Nikara or all shamans. She recalls Altan saying they were “Half-breed brats. Beastly freaks. Stupid savages” (22). While being critical of Hesperia’s dehumanization of the Nikara, she uses the same dehumanizing rhetoric against the Mugenese. Eventually, Rin believes her true war “wasn’t civil” but “global” (580): she wants to “bring down the west” to free Nikan (580). Rin’s complicated relationship to colonialism and racial supremacy show the degree to which colonialist ideologies are multidirectional and multifaceted. Her actions raise questions about who is complicit in colonial violence and whether such violence justifies further violence. 


People like Vaisra and Nezha work with Hesperia to a degree, though they do so for different reasons. Vaisra is so desperate for power that he works with Hesperia to be instituted as a puppet ruler. He exploits the Mugenese impulse toward colonization for the same purpose, letting them “coloniz[e] the south in a matter of months” while he fought Daji to “undercut his own allies in a long-term ploy to strengthen his own grasp” on Nikan (13). In doing this, Vaisra reenacts the exploitative strategies of a country like Hesperia, perpetuating colonialism in his own country. Vaisra’s method of interacting with Hesperia is one of the only strategies the novel definitively positions as wrong rather than morally ambiguous or complex.


Nezha, by contrast, tells Rin that he knows Hesperia wants them to be “another slave society for them to exploit” and he “will not see this land ruled by foreign hands” (101). However, in order to do this, he wants to “make concessions” and “stay in their good graces” (602), something Rin is unwilling to do. This is the primary impetus for their conflict, as Nezha continuously tries to recruit Rin to his side and she resists, causing the civil war that leads to millions of Nikara casualties.


Moments before dying by suicide, Rin tells Nezha that “the only way forward” is for him to tell Hesperia he killed her: “Tell them everything they want to hear. Say whatever you need to to get them to trust you […] Fix this” (613, 614). In her final moments, Rin faces the bleak truth: The West’s technology and impulse to colonize the East is so overpowering and relentless that colonization is unavoidable, and the type of resistance she was attempting only succeeded at killing her countrymen. The novel does not make prescriptive assertions about how to resist colonization. Rather, it points out the impossible choices people are forced to make when doing so.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence